EditorsAbout the SiteComes vs. MicrosoftUsing This Web SiteSite ArchivesCredibility IndexOOXMLOpenDocumentPatentsNovellNews DigestSite NewsRSS

06.27.07

Mark Shuttleworth Interview Coming, Request for Questions from Our Readers

Posted in Interview, Site News, Ubuntu at 7:31 am by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

Dear readers,

As you may be aware, Ubuntu’s founder was among the first prominent figures to denounce the predatory deal with Novell and later on criticise Microsoft’s pursuit for further deals with other Linux distributors. This influenced my personal decision to move from SuSE to Ubuntu GNU/Linux.

I have just gotten a (vitual) handshake which promises an interview with Mr. Shuttleworth. We would like to ask our readers for input and collect some of our readers’ questions. Our intent is to focus on exclusionary deals and the integrity of Free software although any ‘lighter’ questions would be very suitable as well. Our controversial domain name aside, I worry that my direct questions intimidated Gunther Deschner (of Samba), who was willing to do an interview with us after his departure from Novell.

Please help us make this interview a comfortable one for Mr. Shuttleworth.

Thank you in advance for your participation. Remember that it is a community site which we hope to make more reader-driven, not editor-driven.

Share this post: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • co.mments
  • DZone
  • email
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • NewsVine
  • Print
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Facebook

If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

Pages that cross-reference this one

32 Comments

  1. Mark said,

    June 27, 2007 at 7:49 am

    Gravatar

    i don’t really have a Q for him. If you would please let him know that I thank him and I’m sure the rest of the Linux community is thankful for standing up to Microsoft.

  2. Question said,

    June 27, 2007 at 8:51 am

    Gravatar

    That will be a nasty ;)
    “Mark do you think that actions like boycottnovell.com are good for community? Is it smart to boycott distro like openSUSE? OpenSUSE has hundreds of great developers and saying them “we don’t like you anymore” is a good idea? It is against community and openSUSE is still a community distro.”

  3. paulw said,

    June 27, 2007 at 9:02 am

    Gravatar

    Is it smart to boycott distro like openSUSE?

    Of course, It’s a form of Civil disobedience. People make a product great , not developers.

    Paul

  4. John Drinkwater said,

    June 27, 2007 at 10:25 am

    Gravatar

    Does Mark consider Mono as a problem in regards to Microsoft waving their sabre, and would he remove it from the base Ubuntu distro? And even if he doesn’t, would he at least make it easier to remove if someone wanted to? (like it not being a part of the meta package ubuntu-desktop iirc)

  5. David said,

    June 27, 2007 at 11:00 am

    Gravatar

    My question is this:

    While it is not clear that a patenting deal will affect the integrity of free software (after all the deal only touches MS and Novell, and not third parties) integrating proprietary software that is required to run free software might do so (see proprietary drivers). Don’t Ubuntu’s actions give a disincentive for free software developers to write and improve free drivers by admitting proprietary drivers?

  6. shane coyle said,

    June 27, 2007 at 12:10 pm

    Gravatar

    Who’s boycotting OpenSUSE?

  7. Martin X said,

    June 27, 2007 at 12:22 pm

    Gravatar

    Mark once said (I believe) that Ubuntu will always be available for free download. Does this mean that the /best/ version will always be available free? Or might he start to sell a “with bells & whistles” version, and only offer a basic version free to us proles?

    I love the free CD thing going on at http://shipit.ubuntu.com, this makes Ubuntu available even to folk who don’t have a fast net link (ie most of the world). Does he plan to keep Shipit going “forever”?

    Oh, and a word of crawly congrats: I have tried a few different distros, but I /lurve/ Ubuntu and I’ve settled on it as my distro of choice. I hope Mark does keep sticking up for the “little man” – a decent, free OS empowers us more than even democracy in some countries!

  8. Jack Loftus said,

    June 27, 2007 at 12:32 pm

    Gravatar

    As Ubuntu grows in popularity as a server OS, how does Canonical plan to support it? What changes are coming from Canonical in terms of enterprise support for Ubuntu? What specifically is offered now, to tempt users to try Ubuntu in the enterprise, and not Novell or Red Hat? How far has enterprise Linux support come, in your opinion?

  9. shane coyle said,

    June 27, 2007 at 2:01 pm

    Gravatar

    I am pretty much along the lines of David’s question, how does Mr. Shuttleworth distinguish between Novell’s pragmatic but GPL-questionable approach to IP peace with Microsoft and Ubuntu’s pragmatic but GPL-questionable approach to including binary-only drivers?

    Otherwise, "thank you thank you thank you".

  10. Harsh Chaudhry said,

    June 27, 2007 at 3:38 pm

    Gravatar

    Q: What does Mark feel about the Mono project with regards to it being a port of a proprietary technology, and the fact that Mono will always lag dot net (if it stays true to its charter) featurewise?

    Also, since we are talking about voting with our “Download Now” clicks, how does Mark feel about GNOME being the primary desktop for Ubuntu given its relation with Novell and DeIcaza and the rest?

  11. Carl said,

    June 27, 2007 at 3:56 pm

    Gravatar

    All indicators tell that Ubuntu is the most popular distro. At the same time, all polls tell us that KDE is the most popular desktop.

    I will leave the fact that these two conclusions do not add up in the middle. BUT…. I would like to know why Ubuntu is still not serious about a true KDE implementation. Please do not try to convince us that Kubuntu gets as much attention as Ubuntu. It does not (one example: the plugin finder).

  12. Rex Ballard said,

    June 27, 2007 at 4:22 pm

    Gravatar

    My main question is “How can you possibly negotiate on behalf of all of the contributors to all Linux and OSS products used in Linux, and not disclose the exact nature of the agreement to those stake-holders?

    Seriously. Novell is a late-comer to the game, and is riding the wave of a phenomenon that started in 1993 and continued to build – WITHOUT Novell’s support – until 2005, when Novell FINALLY decided to promote SUSE instead of trying to kill it.

    Remember when Novell signed the deal with Microsoft over UnixWare in 1994(-5?)? Novell scuttled their Workstation/desktop/laptop platform development. Microsoft was supposed to scuttle their server development. I don’t think Microsoft even slowed it down.

    Ray Noorda had to create new companies (Caldera and TrollTech) to keep that talent pool, and make sure that they had the chance to get a Linux based workstation platform to market.

    Had Novell pushed hard enough in 1994, when Windows NT 3.x was flapping, Chicago was vaporware that was not to be delivered for almost 22 months, and Microsoft was still trying to keep OEMs loyal to Windows 3.1, they could have made a huge killing in the market.

    Instead Novell almost went bankrupt, they sold unlimited license rights to Linux for a pittance, and wrote Microsoft was given almost 2 years to retake control of the market with Windows 95, which killed off Netware substantially.

    And Microsoft “thanked” them, by releasing replacements for Netware and NDS.

    If Novell has signed away ANY rights without getting the consent from the developers who crontributed so much to Linux and OSS, it could turn into one UGLY class action lawsuit.

  13. Roy Schestowitz said,

    June 27, 2007 at 4:48 pm

    Gravatar

    @paulw — as we said before, we don’t boycott the developers’ work (Opensuse). The poor and selfish decision was made by the management.

  14. lala said,

    June 28, 2007 at 12:00 am

    Gravatar

    Ask him why a lot of ubuntu users are assholes.

  15. Roy Schestowitz said,

    June 28, 2007 at 1:15 am

    Gravatar

    Actually, speaking from experience, Ubuntu users are usually polite and friendly. The ‘elitists’ use older distributions.

  16. Mark said,

    June 28, 2007 at 3:33 am

    Gravatar

    When Mark started Ubuntu and Canonical, he said time would tell if it was a sensible business decision or philantropy. How is the financial balance now? Does Canonical/Ubuntu make money or is it a money pit?

    BTW, I love Kubuntu!

  17. Martin said,

    June 28, 2007 at 3:44 am

    Gravatar

    Dear Mark,

    I am curious what download is more popular: Ubuntu or Kubuntu? Can you give percentages of the total downloads (incl. Xubuntu)?

  18. David said,

    June 28, 2007 at 4:13 am

    Gravatar

    Mark.
    Gutsy Gibbon will have support for some Winmodem chips.
    An area not covered at all well by open source drivers.
    I guess that will not cause too many to give up writing those drivers!
    I will finally be able to look at getting more people to try Linux.
    One friend converted to broadband recently and I dual booted XP/Feisty on his new machine. He asked me to remove Windows!

  19. Amir Amini said,

    June 28, 2007 at 9:20 am

    Gravatar

    1) Since Ubuntu was based on Debian, what is the relation between Ubuntu and the Debian team. Will Ubuntu remain compatible with Debian?

    2) How much effort does the Ubuntu team put into getting their modifications/improvements upstream?

  20. Andrew said,

    June 28, 2007 at 11:01 am

    Gravatar

    One hot topic in the OSS world is proprietary software. The hardcore geeks want only open source software. But most of the luddites just want whatever works. And it would seem like Ubuntu is trying to reach out to the luddites. What is your stance?

  21. Mike said,

    June 28, 2007 at 11:35 am

    Gravatar

    I only run Ubuntu. I even convinced my wife and kids to use it after our Windows PC got zombied no matter how hard we tried to control it. Thanks for making a sensational product.

    Red Hat recently told Reuters that they were actually considering the patent deal with The Beast before the deal with Novell went through. Can Canonical stand the pressure and resist dealing with The Beast? In fact, if I were a betting man, I’d bet that The Beast has men in black suits showing up in South Africa, putting free PCs and free MS software in schools, snatching up all the good programmers, then driving over to meet with legislators to try and create patent, extradition, and other changes in the legal system to try and thwart Ubuntu. If the latest news is that Dell is selling Ubuntu very well now, and if even HP is taking notice and considering it too, it’s an easy bet to see what devious means The Beast will be up to.

    Could Canonical design a web-based management system sort of like ebox-platform (http://ebox-platform.com/), but for Ubuntu Server? Not only would this be great for building server appliances for a web app I’m designing, but it would be great for mom and pop shops (small businesses) to have a replacement for a Microsoft print server, file server, domain controller, dns server, dhcp server, etc. And if it can’t be part of Canonical, could it be another company funded by Canonical? (Pay me — I’ll build it if I had the cash to quit my day job. :) )

  22. akf said,

    June 28, 2007 at 1:55 pm

    Gravatar

    My questions:

    how do you feel about the gNewSense project?
    (when) will launchpad and the other online stuff be free software?
    It has been promised a long time ago

    akf

  23. Shane Coyle said,

    June 28, 2007 at 3:27 pm

    Gravatar

    @AKF: Ubuntu has plans for a "militantly-free" version to be released in collaboration with the gNewSense folks, around the gutsy gibbon release.

    and, I too am interested in the promised opening up of Launchpad…

  24. Roy Schestowitz said,

    June 28, 2007 at 6:29 pm

    Gravatar

    I see a lot of good questions. We’ll have to get them sorted in a logical order.

    Keep them coming and thank you for participating in this. We can probably finalise tomorrow and work on the questions over the weekend.

  25. Ronald Abadi said,

    June 28, 2007 at 8:11 pm

    Gravatar

    My questions are pretty much the same with Martin X’s questions. I just want to add one question: will Xubuntu be available with Shipit in the future?

  26. Timothy Musson said,

    June 30, 2007 at 3:53 am

    Gravatar

    Mark,

    You’ve said that Ubuntu will distribute non-free drivers until the user base is large enough to influence hardware manufacturers.

    Assuming that most Ubuntu users don’t have ethical or technical issues with non-free software, what incentive do you think they’ll have to start saying “no” to non-free drivers at some point in the future?

  27. David said,

    July 1, 2007 at 10:44 am

    Gravatar

    I want to echo Carl questioned above regarding KDE. Kubuntu appears to lack any true direction. I’d like to see more resources sent that way for a least a couple of releases.

  28. Roy Schestowitz said,

    July 1, 2007 at 8:41 pm

    Gravatar

    David, just a quick personal opinion here — as a KDE user, I advise that you look at the wonderful things that are coming in KDE 4. The project is very much alive and it thrives. It certainly has a direction.

  29. David said,

    July 2, 2007 at 7:42 am

    Gravatar

    Roy,
    I agree that KDE4 looks pretty promising, but there is more to creating a desktop distribution than just packaging the latest desktops environments. For example, I think someone mentioned earlier the codec work done in Ubuntu doesn’t show up in Kubuntu. I don’t think I saw the restricted driver manager in the last release either. IMO Adept is a usability nightmare. There are several things that just look poorly thought out. I’m not trying to attack the Kubuntu developers here. I just think they need more help and attention from the main project.

  30. Roy Schestowitz said,

    July 2, 2007 at 7:49 am

    Gravatar

    I personally chose to install Ubuntu and sudo apt-get install KDE. It works like a charm. I also installed elements of KDE 4 on top of KDE 3.5.x. I’m loving it!

  31. Verona Griffiths said,

    September 22, 2007 at 5:36 am

    Gravatar

    Thank you, you are appreciated

    Kind regards,

    V.

  32. Open Thinking said,

    December 18, 2008 at 7:02 am

    Gravatar

    Who do you guys think that are developing linux and open source and paying it?
    Don’t you know/realize that only free-given ubuntu isn’t getting any incomes, so it can’t do much development either. Other linux/open source -companies, like Novell are making the development actually and earn the money for it with their products that they sell.

    Take a look at the information on Linux Foundation :

    http://www.linuxfoundation.org/publications/linuxkerneldevelopment.php

    In that list there isn’t Canonical – because it just isn’t doing much.
    It just packs software that others do and others pay.

    So, the development of linux and open source isn’t free either, it need money too and actually the work is done by paid developers of commercial companies and with their money of their products.

    There seems to be some kinda illusions of linux and open source made freely – but that’s just an wrong illusion. Google pays 90% of Firefox development. IBM, SUN and others pay the development of OpenOffice. Commercial companies pay the development of linux. There’s actually verhy little of non-paid job behind them. And the development of linux and open source need so much profession too, like with OS X and Windows, so it just can’t be done by whoever – it need profession, so the development is highly professional too. Mainly the user group support web sites and such things rely partly on free non-paid job.

    And Mark is funding the operation of Canonical and the free distribution of linux … but the money comes from his previous commercial earnings, and there’s sure limit of that. So present just free distribution stage of ubuntu is sure not gonna ongo forever. It too needs incomes in the future.

    And SUSE/Novell that the ubuntu-folks are blaiming is doing the hard work, funding and making the real coding and development and then gives it to Canonical to use and distribute free. So why on earth you are blaiming Novell, of the enabling all this linux and open source?
    Think a little!

What Else is New


  1. Links 27/2/2017: GNU Linux-libre 4.10, Weston 2.0.0, Git 2.12.0, Linux From Scratch 8.0

    Links for the day



  2. Top Officials in French Government Are Growing Tired of Battistelli's Abuses at the European Patent Office (EPO)

    An automated translation of a recent debate about the EPO in the French government, culminating in intervention by Richard Yung



  3. A US Supreme Court (SCOTUS) Which is Hostile Towards Patent Maximalists May Closely Examine More Patents That Apple Uses Against Android

    A company which often takes pride in designers rather than developers (art, not technical merit) may lose that leverage over the competition if its questionable patents are taken away by the Supremes



  4. As Long as Software Patents Are Granted and Microsoft Equips Trolls With Them, “Azure IP Advantage” is an Attack on Free/Libre Software

    Microsoft is feeding enemies of GNU/Linux and Free/libre Open Source software (FLOSS) in order to sell its 'protection', which it names "IP Advantage" in a rather Orwellian fashion (same naming as back in the Novell days)



  5. Patent Trolls on Their Way Out in the United States and Their Way Into China, No Thanks to the Open Invention Network (OIN)

    An update on patent trolls and the role played by supposed allies of Free/libre software, who in practice do everything to exacerbate the problem rather than resolve it



  6. Insensitivity at the EPO’s Management – Part VIII: When Governed by Criminals, Truth-Tellers Are Cast as Criminals and Criminals as Justice Deliverers

    The bizarre state of affairs at the European Patent Office, where being an honest and transparent person makes one incredibly vulnerable and subjected to constant harassment from the management



  7. The Sickness of the EPO – Part V: Shedding Light on Institutional Abuse Against Ill and/or Disabled Individuals

    The seriousness of the situation at the EPO and a call for action, which requires greater transparency, even if imposed transparency



  8. The EPO's Race to the Bottom in Recruitment and Early Retirements Explained by an Insider

    The European Patent Office under Battistelli is failing to attract -- and certainly failing to retain -- talented examiners



  9. Wouter Pors and Other UPC Boosters Believe That Repeating the Lies Will Potentially Make Them Truths

    The lobbying campaign for UPC, or hopeful lies (sometimes mere rumours) disguised as "news", continues to rely on false perceptions that the UPC is just a matter of time and may actually materialise this year



  10. The Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) is Utilised in Fixing the US Patent System and the Patent Microcosm Loses Its Mind

    A roundup of PTAB news, ranging from attacks on the legitimacy of PTAB to progress which is made by PTAB, undoing decades of overpatenting



  11. The Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) and the Federal Circuit (CAFC) Take on Patents Pertaining to Business Methods

    Patents on tasks that can be performed using pen and paper (so-called 'business methods', just like algorithms) and oughtn't be patent-eligible may be the next casualty of the America Invents Act (AIA)



  12. Google's Stewardship of GNU/Linux (Android, Chromebooks and More) in Doubt After Company Resorts to Patent 'First Strikes'

    Google has just turned a little more evil, by essentially using patents as a weapon against the competition (by no means a defensive move)



  13. Links 24/2/2017: Ubuntu 17.04 Beta, OpenBSD Foundation Nets $573,000 in Donations

    Links for the day



  14. IAM, Greased up by the EPO, Continues Lobbying by Shaming Tactics for the UPC, Under the Guise of 'News'

    The shrill and well-paid writers of IAM are still at it, promoting the Unitary Patent (UPC) at every opportunity and every turn



  15. Patent Scope Gone Awry: European Vegetable Patents Office?

    In its misguided race to raise so-called 'production', the EPO lost sight of its original goals and now facilitates patent royalty payments/taxation for naturally-recurring items of nature



  16. Yes, There is Definitely Brain Drain (Experience Deficit) at the European Patent Office and Stakeholders Feel It

    The direction that the European Patent Office has taken under Battistelli undoes many decades (almost half a century) of reputation-building and progress and naturally this repels existing staff, not to mention hampers recruitment efforts



  17. The Sickness of the EPO – Part IV: Cruel Management That Deliberately Attacks the Sick and the Weak

    The dysphoric reality at the European Patent Office, which is becoming like a large cell (with bolted-down windows) where people are controlled by fear and scapegoats are selected to perpetuate this atmosphere of terror and maintain demand (or workload) for the Investigative Stasi



  18. Links 23/2/2017: Qt 5.9 Alpha, First SHA1 Collision

    Links for the day



  19. UPC Roundup: War on the Appeal Boards, British Motion Against the UPC, Fröhlinger Recalled, and Fake News About Spain

    Taking stock of some of the latest attempts to shove the Unitary Patent (UPC) down Europe's throat, courtesy of Team Battistelli and Team UPC



  20. The Sickness of the EPO – Part III: Invalidity and Suicides

    An explanation of what drives a lot of EPO veterans to depression and sometimes even suicide



  21. The Appeal Board (PTAB) and Federal Circuit (CAFC) Maintain Good Pace of Patent Elimination Where Scope Was Exceeded

    The Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) continues to accept about 4 out of 5 decisions of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) and the US Supreme Court (SCOTUS) refuses to intervene



  22. Software Patents Are Ebbing Away, But the “Swamp” Fights Back and Hijacks the Word “Fix”

    The club of patent maximalists, or those who profit from excess prosecution and legal chaos, isn't liking what has happened in the United States and it wants everything reversed



  23. Report From Yesterday's Debate About the European Patent Office (EPO) at the Bavarian Landtag

    A report of the EPO debate which took place at the Bavarian Landtag yesterday (21/2/2017)



  24. Links 22/2/2017: Wine-Staging 2.2, Nautilus 3.24

    Links for the day



  25. French Politician Richard Yung Tells the Government About Abuses at the European Patent Office (EPO)

    The subject of EPO scandals has once again landed in French politics, just a couple of months since it last happened



  26. The Sickness of the EPO – Part II: Background Information and Insights

    With a privatised, in-house (sometimes outsourced and for-profit) force for surveillance, policing, justice, public relations and now medical assessment (mere vassals or marionettes of the management) the EPO serves to show that it has become indistinguishable from North Korea, where the Supreme Leader gets to control every single aspect (absolutely no separation of powers)



  27. EPO Cartoon/Caricature by KrewinkelKrijst

    A new rendition by Dutch cartoonist and illustrator KrewinkelKrijst



  28. Inverting Narratives: IAM 'Magazine' Paints Massive Patent Bully Microsoft (Preying on the Weak) as a Defender of the Powerless

    Selective coverage and deliberate misinterpretation of Microsoft's tactics (patent settlement under threat, disguised as "pre-installation of some of the US company’s software products") as seen in IAM almost every week these days



  29. The Sickness of the EPO – Part I: Motivation for New Series of Articles

    An introduction or prelude to a long series of upcoming posts, whose purpose is to show governance by coercion, pressure, retribution and tribalism rather than professional relationship between human beings at the European Patent Office (EPO)



  30. Insensitivity at the EPO’s Management – Part VII: EPO Hypocrisy on Cancer and Lack of Feedback to and From ECPC

    The European Cancer Patient Coalition (ECPC), which calls itself "the largest European cancer patients' umbrella organisation," fails to fulfill its duties, says a source of ours, and the EPO makes things even worse


CoPilotCo

RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

CoPilotCo

Recent Posts