EditorsAbout the SiteComes vs. MicrosoftUsing This Web SiteSite ArchivesCredibility IndexOOXMLOpenDocumentPatentsNovellNews DigestSite NewsRSS


Mark Shuttleworth Interview Coming, Request for Questions from Our Readers

Posted in Interview, Site News, Ubuntu at 7:31 am by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

Dear readers,

As you may be aware, Ubuntu’s founder was among the first prominent figures to denounce the predatory deal with Novell and later on criticise Microsoft’s pursuit for further deals with other Linux distributors. This influenced my personal decision to move from SuSE to Ubuntu GNU/Linux.

I have just gotten a (vitual) handshake which promises an interview with Mr. Shuttleworth. We would like to ask our readers for input and collect some of our readers’ questions. Our intent is to focus on exclusionary deals and the integrity of Free software although any ‘lighter’ questions would be very suitable as well. Our controversial domain name aside, I worry that my direct questions intimidated Gunther Deschner (of Samba), who was willing to do an interview with us after his departure from Novell.

Please help us make this interview a comfortable one for Mr. Shuttleworth.

Thank you in advance for your participation. Remember that it is a community site which we hope to make more reader-driven, not editor-driven.

Share this post: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • co.mments
  • DZone
  • email
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • NewsVine
  • Print
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Facebook

If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

Pages that cross-reference this one


  1. Mark said,

    June 27, 2007 at 7:49 am


    i don’t really have a Q for him. If you would please let him know that I thank him and I’m sure the rest of the Linux community is thankful for standing up to Microsoft.

  2. Question said,

    June 27, 2007 at 8:51 am


    That will be a nasty ;)
    “Mark do you think that actions like boycottnovell.com are good for community? Is it smart to boycott distro like openSUSE? OpenSUSE has hundreds of great developers and saying them “we don’t like you anymore” is a good idea? It is against community and openSUSE is still a community distro.”

  3. paulw said,

    June 27, 2007 at 9:02 am


    Is it smart to boycott distro like openSUSE?

    Of course, It’s a form of Civil disobedience. People make a product great , not developers.


  4. John Drinkwater said,

    June 27, 2007 at 10:25 am


    Does Mark consider Mono as a problem in regards to Microsoft waving their sabre, and would he remove it from the base Ubuntu distro? And even if he doesn’t, would he at least make it easier to remove if someone wanted to? (like it not being a part of the meta package ubuntu-desktop iirc)

  5. David said,

    June 27, 2007 at 11:00 am


    My question is this:

    While it is not clear that a patenting deal will affect the integrity of free software (after all the deal only touches MS and Novell, and not third parties) integrating proprietary software that is required to run free software might do so (see proprietary drivers). Don’t Ubuntu’s actions give a disincentive for free software developers to write and improve free drivers by admitting proprietary drivers?

  6. shane coyle said,

    June 27, 2007 at 12:10 pm


    Who’s boycotting OpenSUSE?

  7. Martin X said,

    June 27, 2007 at 12:22 pm


    Mark once said (I believe) that Ubuntu will always be available for free download. Does this mean that the /best/ version will always be available free? Or might he start to sell a “with bells & whistles” version, and only offer a basic version free to us proles?

    I love the free CD thing going on at http://shipit.ubuntu.com, this makes Ubuntu available even to folk who don’t have a fast net link (ie most of the world). Does he plan to keep Shipit going “forever”?

    Oh, and a word of crawly congrats: I have tried a few different distros, but I /lurve/ Ubuntu and I’ve settled on it as my distro of choice. I hope Mark does keep sticking up for the “little man” – a decent, free OS empowers us more than even democracy in some countries!

  8. Jack Loftus said,

    June 27, 2007 at 12:32 pm


    As Ubuntu grows in popularity as a server OS, how does Canonical plan to support it? What changes are coming from Canonical in terms of enterprise support for Ubuntu? What specifically is offered now, to tempt users to try Ubuntu in the enterprise, and not Novell or Red Hat? How far has enterprise Linux support come, in your opinion?

  9. shane coyle said,

    June 27, 2007 at 2:01 pm


    I am pretty much along the lines of David’s question, how does Mr. Shuttleworth distinguish between Novell’s pragmatic but GPL-questionable approach to IP peace with Microsoft and Ubuntu’s pragmatic but GPL-questionable approach to including binary-only drivers?

    Otherwise, "thank you thank you thank you".

  10. Harsh Chaudhry said,

    June 27, 2007 at 3:38 pm


    Q: What does Mark feel about the Mono project with regards to it being a port of a proprietary technology, and the fact that Mono will always lag dot net (if it stays true to its charter) featurewise?

    Also, since we are talking about voting with our “Download Now” clicks, how does Mark feel about GNOME being the primary desktop for Ubuntu given its relation with Novell and DeIcaza and the rest?

  11. Carl said,

    June 27, 2007 at 3:56 pm


    All indicators tell that Ubuntu is the most popular distro. At the same time, all polls tell us that KDE is the most popular desktop.

    I will leave the fact that these two conclusions do not add up in the middle. BUT…. I would like to know why Ubuntu is still not serious about a true KDE implementation. Please do not try to convince us that Kubuntu gets as much attention as Ubuntu. It does not (one example: the plugin finder).

  12. Rex Ballard said,

    June 27, 2007 at 4:22 pm


    My main question is “How can you possibly negotiate on behalf of all of the contributors to all Linux and OSS products used in Linux, and not disclose the exact nature of the agreement to those stake-holders?

    Seriously. Novell is a late-comer to the game, and is riding the wave of a phenomenon that started in 1993 and continued to build – WITHOUT Novell’s support – until 2005, when Novell FINALLY decided to promote SUSE instead of trying to kill it.

    Remember when Novell signed the deal with Microsoft over UnixWare in 1994(-5?)? Novell scuttled their Workstation/desktop/laptop platform development. Microsoft was supposed to scuttle their server development. I don’t think Microsoft even slowed it down.

    Ray Noorda had to create new companies (Caldera and TrollTech) to keep that talent pool, and make sure that they had the chance to get a Linux based workstation platform to market.

    Had Novell pushed hard enough in 1994, when Windows NT 3.x was flapping, Chicago was vaporware that was not to be delivered for almost 22 months, and Microsoft was still trying to keep OEMs loyal to Windows 3.1, they could have made a huge killing in the market.

    Instead Novell almost went bankrupt, they sold unlimited license rights to Linux for a pittance, and wrote Microsoft was given almost 2 years to retake control of the market with Windows 95, which killed off Netware substantially.

    And Microsoft “thanked” them, by releasing replacements for Netware and NDS.

    If Novell has signed away ANY rights without getting the consent from the developers who crontributed so much to Linux and OSS, it could turn into one UGLY class action lawsuit.

  13. Roy Schestowitz said,

    June 27, 2007 at 4:48 pm


    @paulw — as we said before, we don’t boycott the developers’ work (Opensuse). The poor and selfish decision was made by the management.

  14. lala said,

    June 28, 2007 at 12:00 am


    Ask him why a lot of ubuntu users are assholes.

  15. Roy Schestowitz said,

    June 28, 2007 at 1:15 am


    Actually, speaking from experience, Ubuntu users are usually polite and friendly. The ‘elitists’ use older distributions.

  16. Mark said,

    June 28, 2007 at 3:33 am


    When Mark started Ubuntu and Canonical, he said time would tell if it was a sensible business decision or philantropy. How is the financial balance now? Does Canonical/Ubuntu make money or is it a money pit?

    BTW, I love Kubuntu!

  17. Martin said,

    June 28, 2007 at 3:44 am


    Dear Mark,

    I am curious what download is more popular: Ubuntu or Kubuntu? Can you give percentages of the total downloads (incl. Xubuntu)?

  18. David said,

    June 28, 2007 at 4:13 am


    Gutsy Gibbon will have support for some Winmodem chips.
    An area not covered at all well by open source drivers.
    I guess that will not cause too many to give up writing those drivers!
    I will finally be able to look at getting more people to try Linux.
    One friend converted to broadband recently and I dual booted XP/Feisty on his new machine. He asked me to remove Windows!

  19. Amir Amini said,

    June 28, 2007 at 9:20 am


    1) Since Ubuntu was based on Debian, what is the relation between Ubuntu and the Debian team. Will Ubuntu remain compatible with Debian?

    2) How much effort does the Ubuntu team put into getting their modifications/improvements upstream?

  20. Andrew said,

    June 28, 2007 at 11:01 am


    One hot topic in the OSS world is proprietary software. The hardcore geeks want only open source software. But most of the luddites just want whatever works. And it would seem like Ubuntu is trying to reach out to the luddites. What is your stance?

  21. Mike said,

    June 28, 2007 at 11:35 am


    I only run Ubuntu. I even convinced my wife and kids to use it after our Windows PC got zombied no matter how hard we tried to control it. Thanks for making a sensational product.

    Red Hat recently told Reuters that they were actually considering the patent deal with The Beast before the deal with Novell went through. Can Canonical stand the pressure and resist dealing with The Beast? In fact, if I were a betting man, I’d bet that The Beast has men in black suits showing up in South Africa, putting free PCs and free MS software in schools, snatching up all the good programmers, then driving over to meet with legislators to try and create patent, extradition, and other changes in the legal system to try and thwart Ubuntu. If the latest news is that Dell is selling Ubuntu very well now, and if even HP is taking notice and considering it too, it’s an easy bet to see what devious means The Beast will be up to.

    Could Canonical design a web-based management system sort of like ebox-platform (http://ebox-platform.com/), but for Ubuntu Server? Not only would this be great for building server appliances for a web app I’m designing, but it would be great for mom and pop shops (small businesses) to have a replacement for a Microsoft print server, file server, domain controller, dns server, dhcp server, etc. And if it can’t be part of Canonical, could it be another company funded by Canonical? (Pay me — I’ll build it if I had the cash to quit my day job. :) )

  22. akf said,

    June 28, 2007 at 1:55 pm


    My questions:

    how do you feel about the gNewSense project?
    (when) will launchpad and the other online stuff be free software?
    It has been promised a long time ago


  23. Shane Coyle said,

    June 28, 2007 at 3:27 pm


    @AKF: Ubuntu has plans for a "militantly-free" version to be released in collaboration with the gNewSense folks, around the gutsy gibbon release.

    and, I too am interested in the promised opening up of Launchpad…

  24. Roy Schestowitz said,

    June 28, 2007 at 6:29 pm


    I see a lot of good questions. We’ll have to get them sorted in a logical order.

    Keep them coming and thank you for participating in this. We can probably finalise tomorrow and work on the questions over the weekend.

  25. Ronald Abadi said,

    June 28, 2007 at 8:11 pm


    My questions are pretty much the same with Martin X’s questions. I just want to add one question: will Xubuntu be available with Shipit in the future?

  26. Timothy Musson said,

    June 30, 2007 at 3:53 am



    You’ve said that Ubuntu will distribute non-free drivers until the user base is large enough to influence hardware manufacturers.

    Assuming that most Ubuntu users don’t have ethical or technical issues with non-free software, what incentive do you think they’ll have to start saying “no” to non-free drivers at some point in the future?

  27. David said,

    July 1, 2007 at 10:44 am


    I want to echo Carl questioned above regarding KDE. Kubuntu appears to lack any true direction. I’d like to see more resources sent that way for a least a couple of releases.

  28. Roy Schestowitz said,

    July 1, 2007 at 8:41 pm


    David, just a quick personal opinion here — as a KDE user, I advise that you look at the wonderful things that are coming in KDE 4. The project is very much alive and it thrives. It certainly has a direction.

  29. David said,

    July 2, 2007 at 7:42 am


    I agree that KDE4 looks pretty promising, but there is more to creating a desktop distribution than just packaging the latest desktops environments. For example, I think someone mentioned earlier the codec work done in Ubuntu doesn’t show up in Kubuntu. I don’t think I saw the restricted driver manager in the last release either. IMO Adept is a usability nightmare. There are several things that just look poorly thought out. I’m not trying to attack the Kubuntu developers here. I just think they need more help and attention from the main project.

  30. Roy Schestowitz said,

    July 2, 2007 at 7:49 am


    I personally chose to install Ubuntu and sudo apt-get install KDE. It works like a charm. I also installed elements of KDE 4 on top of KDE 3.5.x. I’m loving it!

  31. Verona Griffiths said,

    September 22, 2007 at 5:36 am


    Thank you, you are appreciated

    Kind regards,


  32. Open Thinking said,

    December 18, 2008 at 7:02 am


    Who do you guys think that are developing linux and open source and paying it?
    Don’t you know/realize that only free-given ubuntu isn’t getting any incomes, so it can’t do much development either. Other linux/open source -companies, like Novell are making the development actually and earn the money for it with their products that they sell.

    Take a look at the information on Linux Foundation :


    In that list there isn’t Canonical – because it just isn’t doing much.
    It just packs software that others do and others pay.

    So, the development of linux and open source isn’t free either, it need money too and actually the work is done by paid developers of commercial companies and with their money of their products.

    There seems to be some kinda illusions of linux and open source made freely – but that’s just an wrong illusion. Google pays 90% of Firefox development. IBM, SUN and others pay the development of OpenOffice. Commercial companies pay the development of linux. There’s actually verhy little of non-paid job behind them. And the development of linux and open source need so much profession too, like with OS X and Windows, so it just can’t be done by whoever – it need profession, so the development is highly professional too. Mainly the user group support web sites and such things rely partly on free non-paid job.

    And Mark is funding the operation of Canonical and the free distribution of linux … but the money comes from his previous commercial earnings, and there’s sure limit of that. So present just free distribution stage of ubuntu is sure not gonna ongo forever. It too needs incomes in the future.

    And SUSE/Novell that the ubuntu-folks are blaiming is doing the hard work, funding and making the real coding and development and then gives it to Canonical to use and distribute free. So why on earth you are blaiming Novell, of the enabling all this linux and open source?
    Think a little!

What Else is New

  1. Links 21/3/2018: Cutelyst 2, More on webOS

    Links for the day

  2. SUEPO: “Today May Be Your Last Chance to Demonstrate Against the Seriously Flawed Reforms That Mr Battistelli Has Imposed” on EPO Staff

    Benoît Battistelli will likely remain involved in EPO affairs for a long time to come (even through a fellow Frenchman, Campinos, whom he swaps two chairs with at the Office and CEIPI), but today is the last opportunity for EPO staff to march in protest against the Battistelli regime, which for the first time ever will result in major staff cuts and growing irrelevance for the Office

  3. Links 20/3/2018: GStreamer 1.14.0, Freespire 3.0, Endless OS 3.3.13

    Links for the day

  4. BIO, MDMA and PhRMA Are Pushing the PTAB-Hostile STRONGER Patents Act While IAM and Patently-O Continue to Bash PTAB

    The patent microcosm, which compares the Board to the above (crude analogy from Judge Rader and other patent extremists), is still trying to kill inter partes reviews (IPRs), in effect overlooking its own hypocrisy on the matter (they don’t want patent justice, they just want to metaphorically ‘shoot down’ the judges)

  5. 35 U.S.C. § 101 is Still Effectively Tackling Software Patents in the US, But Patent Law Firms Lie/Distort to 'Sell' These Anyway

    The assertion that software patents are still worth pursuing in 2018 is based on carefully-constructed spin which mis-frames several court decisions and underplays/downplays/ignores pretty much everything that does not suit the narrative

  6. Battistelli's EPO Became Extremely Reliant on China for Distraction and on Endless Supply of Applications (Supply Which Doesn't Exist)

    Discussion about the EPO granting machine (or patent-printing machine) and figures the way EPO management would rather the public won't ever see them; the concept that China means redemption for this patent system is as laughable as always

  7. The US International Trade Commission (USITC) Against Comcast, Courtesy of the Intellectual Ventures-Connected Rovi

    The USITC/ITC, which mostly serves to impose embargoes (sometimes in shocking defiance of PTAB decisions), is being invoked by a firm connected to the world’s largest patent troll, Intellectual Ventures

  8. Tinder/Match Group Uses Software Patents to Sue a Rival, Obviously Choosing to Sue in Texas

    Software patents are being used for leverage, but only those which were likely granted before Alice and only in courts at districts somewhere around Texas

  9. Links 19/3/2018: Linux 4.16 RC6, Atom 1.25, antiX 17.1, GNU Mcron 1.1

    Links for the day

  10. From PTAB Bashing to Federal Circuit (CAFC) Bashing: How the Patent 'Industry' Sells Software Patents

    The latest tactics of the patent microcosm are just about as distasteful as last month's (or last year's), with focus shifting to the courts and few broadly-misinterpreted patent cases (mainly Finjan, Berkheimer, and Aatrix)

  11. Patent Maximalists Keep Coming Up With New Terms and Buzzwords to Bypass the Practical Ban on Software Patents

    The fightback against Section 101 and the US Supreme Court (notably Alice) seems to concentrate on old and new buzzwords, such as "Software as a Medical Device" ("SaMD") or "Fourth Industrial Revolution" ("4IR"), which the EPO recently paid European media to spread and promote

  12. News About Patents is Often Just Advertisements Composed Directly or Indirectly by Companies That Sell Patents and Patent Services

    Infomercials are still dominant among news about patents, in effect drowning out the signal (real journalism) and instead pushing agenda that is detached from reality, pertinent facts, objective assessment, public interest and so on

  13. Blocks and Paywalls Won't Protect the Patent Trolls' Lobby From Scrutiny/Fact-Checking

    Joff Wild and Benoît Battistelli have much in common, including patent maximalism and chronic resistance to facts (or fact-checking)

  14. China Has Become Very Aggressive With Patents

    China now targets other Asian countries/firms -- more so than Western firms -- with patent lawsuits; we expect this to get worse in years to come

  15. UPC/Battistelli Booster IAM Blames Brexit Rather Than EPO Abuses

    While the EPO is collapsing due to mismanagement the boosters of Team Battistelli would rather deflect and speak about Brexit, which is itself partly motivated by such mismanagement

  16. European Commission Again Urged to Tackle Abuses at the European Patent Office (EPO)

    Rina Ronja Kari is the latest MEP attempting to compel the Commission to actually do something about the EPO other than turning a blind eye

  17. Links 18/3/2018: Wine 3.4, Wine-Staging 3.4, KDE Connect 1.8 for Android

    Links for the day

  18. TXED Courts Are Causing Businesses to Leave the District, Notably For Fear That Having Any Operations Based There is a Legal Liability

    A discussion about the infamous abundance of patent cases in the Eastern District of Texas (TXED/EDTX) and what this will mean for businesses that have branches or any form of operations there (making them subjected to lawsuits in that district even after TC Heartland)

  19. PTAB Hatred is So Intense Among the Patent 'Industry' That Even Scammers Are Hailed as Champions If They Target PTAB

    The patent microcosm is so eager to stop the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) that it's supporting sham deals (or "scams") and exploits/distorts the voice of the new USPTO Director to come up with PTAB-hostile catchphrases

  20. The Patent 'Industry' is Increasingly Mocking CAFC and Its Judges Because It Doesn't Like the Decisions

    Judgmental patent maximalists are still respecting high courts only when it suits them; whenever the outcome is not desirable they're willing to attack the legitimacy of the courts and the competence of judges, even resorting to racist ad hominem attacks if necessary

  21. The Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) Carries on Enforcing § 101, Invalidating Software Patents and Upsetting the Patent 'Industry' in the Process

    A quick report on where PTAB stands at the moment, some time ahead of the Oil States decision (soon to come from the US Supreme Court)

  22. Luxembourg Can Become a Hub of Patent Trolls If the EPO Carries on With Its 'Reforms', Even Without the UPC

    With or without the Unified Patent Court (UPC), which is the wet dream of patent trolls and their legal representatives, the EPO's terrible policies have landed a lot of low-quality patents on the hands of patent trolls (many of which operate through city-states that exist for tax evasion -- a fiscal environment ripe for shells)

  23. The Patent 'Printing Machine' of the EPO Will Spawn Many Lawsuits and Extortions (Threats of Lawsuits), in Effect Taxing Europe

    The money-obsessed, money-printing patent office, where the assembly line mentality has been adopted and patent-printing management is in charge, is devaluing or diluting the pool of European Patents, more so with restrictions (monetary barriers) to challenging bad patents

  24. Links 17/3/2018: Varnish 6, Wine 3.4

    Links for the day

  25. Deleted EPO Tweets and Promotion of Software Patents Amid Complaints About Abuse and Demise of Patent Quality

    Another ordinary day at the EPO with repressions of workforce, promotion of patents that aren't even allowed, and Team UPC failing to get its act together

  26. Guest Post: Suspected “Whitewashing” Operations by Željko Topić in Croatia

    Articles about EPO Vice-President Željko Topić are disappearing and sources indicate that it’s a result of yet more SLAPP from him

  27. Monumental Effort to Highlight Decline in Quality of European Patents (a Quarter of Examiners Sign Petition in Spite of Fear), Yet Barely Any Press Coverage

    he media in Europe continues to be largely apathetic towards the EPO crisis, instead relaying a bunch of press releases and doctored figures from the EPO; only blogs that closely follow EPO scandals bothered mentioning the new petition

  28. Careful Not to Conflate UPC Critics With AfD or Anti-EU Elements

    The tyrannical Unified Patent Court (UPC) is being spun as something that only fascists would oppose after the right-wing, anti-EU politicians in Germany express strong opposition to it

  29. Links 15/3/2018: Qt Creator 4.6 RC, Microsoft Openwashing

    Links for the day

  30. PTAB Continues to Increase Capacity Ahead of Oil States; Patent Maximalists Utterly Upset

    The Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) sees the number of filings up to an almost all-time high and efforts to undermine PTAB are failing pretty badly -- a trend which will be further cemented quite soon when the US Supreme Court (quite likely) backs the processes of PTAB


RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time


Recent Posts