EditorsAbout the SiteComes vs. MicrosoftUsing This Web SiteSite ArchivesCredibility IndexOOXMLOpenDocumentPatentsNovellNews DigestSite NewsRSS

07.17.07

Microsoft Leaves Linspire Robbed, Naked

Posted in Deception, GNU/Linux, GPL, Linspire, Microsoft, Novell at 11:45 pm by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

Well, well, well…

That’s what ‘partners’ are for.

Just shortly after Microsoft had betrayed Novell, Microsoft decided to move on to Linspire. DinformationWeek, which has been Microsoft’s pet for delivering endless FUD recently, has the report.

Microsoft says software that’s licensed under a new version of a popular open source license isn’t covered by the patent protection deal it recently signed with desktop Linux distributor Linspire.

If we get this straight, and only if (that’s a big if) Microsoft’s claims are legally valid at all, Linspire faces two choices (or scenarios) now:

  • Linspire has no access to GPLv3-licensed software, of which there will be plenty.
  • Linspire achieved nothing with its deal. It is not supposedly ‘protected’. It spends money building a so-called ‘translator’ to serve a convicted monopoly abuser. It also propagates the myth that Linux requires protection and at the same time drives many of its existing customers away.

This might be the perfect punishment to the man who called certain Linux distributors “high-brow pirates” and, as a Linux distributor, spread FUD on behalf on Microsoft (for profit).

A question remains here. Are Novell and Xandros affected by association/inference?

Have a look at this discussion at Digg.com and the pointers it contains. It says it all.

Share this post: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • co.mments
  • DZone
  • email
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • NewsVine
  • Print
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Facebook

If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

Pages that cross-reference this one

19 Comments

  1. elkosmas said,

    July 18, 2007 at 7:09 am

    Gravatar

    Here in greece the we had Microsoft-Goverment “agreement” one year later the Goverment doesn’t report to the public about the context of this “agreement”…. sometimes i don’t know what’s worst. “M$Agreements” with OS software companies or with Goverments

  2. Roy Schestowitz said,

    July 18, 2007 at 7:42 am

    Gravatar

    Here in Britain we have some similar problems with BECTA, which always procures Microsoft software for education. The Open Source Consortium is looking into it.

    Example articles:


    Becta’s schools software scheme reported to EC

    ,—-[ Quote ]
    | An advisor to Becta, the education technology quango, has complained
    | to the European Commission about its procurement process for firms
    | to provide online learning platforms and content to British schools.
    `—-

    http://www.theregister.co.uk/2007/01…_ec_complaint/

    OSC joins criticism of UK education’s attitude to open source

    ,—-[ Quote ]
    | Open Source Consortium president, Mark Taylor, has been in contact to
    | voice its opinion on the controversy surrounding Becta’s purchasing
    | frameworks and the adoption of open source adoption in UK schools.
    |
    | In short, it doesn’t make happy reading for Becta. “The essence of
    | our concern is that they’re saying one thing and actually pursuing
    | policies that are exclusive,” he said. “Becta’s own research shows there
    | are major benefits [with open source], however the reality of the
    | framework is that it excludes both products and services.”
    `—-

    http://www.businessreviewonline.com/…ins_criti.html

    UK Government criticised for stifling open source in schools

    ,—-[ Quote ]
    | MP Pugh reckons shcools should support independent or open source
    | software firms. He says, “In my experience a school is a key part
    | of the community and as such has a role to play in the economy of
    | that community. By supporting SMEs the local high-technology
    | industry will be encouraged which will benefit everyone.”
    `—-

    http://www.theinquirer.net/default.aspx?article=36464

    Becta under fire for procurement framework

    ,—-[ Quote ]
    | Nineteen MPs have accused a government agency of restricting the
    | procurement of software in schools.
    `—-

    http://www.theregister.co.uk/2006/11…nt_criticised/

    MPs criticise government roadblocks to Open Source adoption in schools

    ,—-[ Quote ]
    | The UK Government’s own studies have shown savings of up to 60% can be
    | made by schools and colleges using Open Source software. Despite this
    | clear advantage, some MPs believe the software procurement frameworks
    | from Becta and official advice from DfES effectively locks out the us
    | of free, Open Source software.
    `—-

    http://opensourceblog.itproportal.com/?p=220

    Among many more…

  3. Gopal said,

    July 18, 2007 at 8:22 am

    Gravatar

    If OpenOffice moves to LGPLv3, would M$ pull out of the OOXML converter deals also ? If so where wiould it leave the likes of Linspire .

  4. Rickie Stallman said,

    July 18, 2007 at 12:42 pm

    Gravatar

    Hey, weren’t you reported to your ISP for crapflooding USENET groups with “advocacy” flamebait? How did that go?

  5. Larz said,

    July 18, 2007 at 12:50 pm

    Gravatar

    Who the hell are you, Rickie? M$ rabble-rouser?

  6. Steve said,

    July 18, 2007 at 1:14 pm

    Gravatar

    Are we really surprised?

    ______________
    http://www.FreeOpenMoko.com

  7. Balmbag Balmer said,

    July 18, 2007 at 1:16 pm

    Gravatar

    C’mon… How can Micro$oft protect distributors from threats that do not exist? These distributors signed deals with M$, when there was no need to, and now they will pay a price for it. I will not shed a single tear and, by the way, who gives a fly’n phuck about Linspire or Novell? There are better distributions out there.

  8. Jonathan said,

    July 18, 2007 at 1:18 pm

    Gravatar

    What’s with the vitriol in the articles and in the comments? You’re not helping your case.

    And for that matter, writing “M$” just screams “from the heart of my Mom’s basement, I stab at thee!” Try working for the EFF or groups actually defending Linux and open-source if you really want to burn Microsoft.

  9. Fred said,

    July 18, 2007 at 2:15 pm

    Gravatar

    Here in Missouri we don’t need Microsoft or Linux. We use “Jesus OS”, pronounced “jeez-os”, for short. The Lord is our chipset and our compiler. He writes the code that makes the whole world sing. He writes the code. He writes the code.

  10. David Ponce said,

    July 18, 2007 at 2:40 pm

    Gravatar

    M$. I like it, not a single tear for me too. Microsoft is continuously proving that we need to get out of the proprietary software, change the copyright institution that is working against progress and enroll the open source revolution.

    Yes M$, you will die slowly…very slowly.

  11. Shawn Q said,

    July 18, 2007 at 2:52 pm

    Gravatar

    I wish most companies got this kind of attention. If we even scraped a smidgen of how criminal most of the worlds corporations can be…we might have a straighter world.

    Roy, I believe Linspire’s efforts were partly due to the “strange new” attitude Microsoft had. Microsoft seemed to “give up” and start unifying with other companies like Novell – which, perhaps was a nice ploy to knife a couple enemies in the back (keep your friends close, enemies closer), but, I couldn’t blame a single head at either Novell or Linspire for at least trying.

  12. Karl L. Gechlik said,

    July 18, 2007 at 3:00 pm

    Gravatar

    Come on! I mean really, who didn’t think Microsoft was capable of doing this? We are going to continue to see these types of shananagins until the world goes open source! And Good Luck With That!

    Good story though from your friends @ http://www.askTheAdmin.com

  13. mike said,

    July 18, 2007 at 9:57 pm

    Gravatar

    Some people have to realize that you cannot make deals with the devil and continue keeping your soul. Everyone who dare making deals with M$ will be doomed forever.

  14. Roy Schestowitz said,

    July 18, 2007 at 11:10 pm

    Gravatar

    Mass grave of Microsoft ‘partners’: Lotus, WordPerfect, Corel, DBase, Netscape, Novell (pre Linux)…

  15. Kennon Keoseyan said,

    July 20, 2007 at 1:33 pm

    Gravatar

    Heh…most of you are like old hens. I am still waiting for SOMETHING bad to happen from the Novell/M$ deal. 6+ months later nothing. Novell made a boatload of cash off M$ and other than the FUD mongering here and a few other places no real damage to Linux is reported. You guys need to go find another jihad cuz this one is just getting silly. So Linspire was stabbed in the back…big shocker there. Businesses make good and bad decisions every day. It is part of the market. It blows me away that the owner of this site has put so much effort into criticizing one that has had zero tangible effect on FOSS other than the FUD that itself helped spread. You want a cause? Try starting a blog called boycottchina.com or boycottimperialism.com. you really want to help the FOSS community? Contribute some code or convert a company from IIS to Apache or something useful. Losers.

  16. sailor said,

    July 20, 2007 at 4:02 pm

    Gravatar

    “effect on FOSS other than the FUD that itself helped spread.”

    That was it’s purpose…because that is all the MS can do…make threats to steer business users away from linux.

  17. Roy Schestowitz said,

    July 20, 2007 at 7:42 pm

    Gravatar

    Kennon,

    Novell has already been betrayed by Microsoft as well. See:

    http://boycottnovell.com/2007/07/10/novell-and-microsoft-meet-gpl/

    Linux distributors must begin to understand that sidling with Microsoft is never an option, no matter how much Microsoft pays (which is does, because it knows the death knell is worth that money).

  18. Chris said,

    March 17, 2008 at 4:26 am

    Gravatar

    I dunno what Linspire is, but I bet if you install it, there’s no mention of GPL. SUSE makes no mention, that’s for sure.

    I contribute to what these people are distributing – so they’re taking my code, removing the GPL references they’re required to show, then selling it on.

    What insane hipocracy – calling other people thieves and pirates, when they’re in fact the worse offenders…

  19. Roy Schestowitz said,

    March 17, 2008 at 4:42 am

    Gravatar

    Linspire you are only allowed to install on one single PC. It’s right there in the licence. Linspire is not free. Needless to say, many developers are rightly pissed off.

What Else is New


  1. Patent Trolls Are Going Bust in the United States (Along With the 'Protection' Racket Conglomerates)

    RPX continues its gradual collapse and patent trolls fail to find leverage now that software patents are kaput and patent opportunists struggle to access Texan courts



  2. IBM's Manny Schecter is Wrong Again and He is Attempting to Justify Patent Trolling

    In yet another dodgy effort to undermine the US Supreme Court and bring back software patents, IBM's "chief patent counsel" (his current job title) expresses views that are bunk or "alternative facts"



  3. EPO Administrative Council Disallows Discussion About Violations of the Law by Benoît Battistelli

    The EPO crisis is not ending for the Administrative Council does not want to tackle any of the obvious problems; Patrick Corcoran is a taboo subject and Ernst is coming across as another protector of Benoît Battistelli, based on today's meeting (the second meeting he chairs)



  4. Links 13/12/2017: GIMP 2.9.8, Fedora 25 End Of Life, AltOS 1.8.3

    Links for the day



  5. Judge Corcoran Got His User ID/Desk Back (as ILO Asked), But Cannot Perform Actual Work

    The latest update regarding Patrick Corcoran, whose 3-year ordeal is far from over in spite of ILO's unambiguous rulings in his favour



  6. The End of Software Patents and PTAB's Role in Enforcing That End

    Software patents are fast becoming a dying breed and the appeal board (PTAB) of the USPTO accelerates this trend, irrespective of patent immunity attempts



  7. No, China Isn't Most Innovative, It's Just Granting a Lot of Low-Quality Patents

    Patent extremists are trying to make China look like a role model or a success story because China grants far too many patents, spurring an explosion in litigation



  8. Battistelli-Campinos Transition Will Be a Smooth One as the Administrative Council Remains the Same and the Boards Still Besieged

    A rather pessimistic (albeit likely realistic) expectation from tomorrow's meeting of the Administrative Council, which continues to show that no lessons were learned and no strategy will be altered to avoid doom (low-quality patents and stocks running out)



  9. Links 12/12/2017: New BlackArch ISO and Stable Kernels

    Links for the day



  10. German Media Helps Cover Up -- Not Cover -- the Latest EPO Scandal

    EPO-Handelsblatt attention diversion tricks may be effective as German media barely shows interest in one of the EPO's biggest scandals to date



  11. PTAB Haters Fail to Guard Bogus Patents, But They Still Try

    Three Affiliated Tribes probably won't enjoy sovereign immunity from PTAB, Dennis Crouch won't manage to slow down PTAB, and patent litigation will stagnate as bad patents perish before they even land in a lawsuit



  12. Team UPC's Tilmann Defends Rogue Vote at 1 AM in the Morning With Just 5% of Politicians (Those With Vested Interests) Attending

    Just when German democracy is being stolen by a legislative coup (in the dead of night when 95% of politicians are absent/asleep) there's someone 'courageous' enough to rear his ugly head and attempt to justify that coup



  13. The Mask Falls: Lobbyist David Kappos Now Composes Pieces for the Patent Trolls' Lobby (IAM)

    David Kappos, a former USPTO Director who is now lobbying for large corporations that derive revenue from patent extortion, is writing for IAM even if his views are significantly biased by his aggressive paymasters (just like IAM's)



  14. The EPO Protest Tomorrow Isn't Just About Judge Corcoran But About the EPO as a Whole

    PO staff is about to protest against the employer, pointing out that "Battistelli is still showing a total and utter lack of respect not only for his staff and their rights but also for the Administrative Council and for the Tribunal"



  15. Claim: Judge Corcoran to Be Put Under Benoît Battistelli's Control in DG1

    Benoît Battistelli, who openly disregards and refuses to obey judges (while intervening in trials and delivering 'royal decrees' whenever it suits him), may soon gain direct control over the judge he hates most



  16. The European Patent Organisation Refrains (For Nearly a Week) From Speaking About Battistelli's Abuses as Judged by ILO Tribunal

    The EPO's silence on the matter of Patrick Corcoran is deafening; to make matters worse, the EPO continues to pollute media and academia with money of stakeholders, with the sole intention of lobbying and misleading news coverage (clearly a disservice to these stakeholders)



  17. Carl Josefsson Lets Judge Patrick Corcoran Come Back to Work at the EPO

    After initial reluctance to obey/respect the rulings from the ILO (security staff declining access) there is official permission for Patrick Corcoran to enter and resume work (following 3 years of injustice against him)



  18. Bristows is Being Hammered With Negative Comments For Its Unitary Patent (UPC) Lies

    The Unified Patent Court (UPC) is practically dead in the UK and Ireland; Bristows, nevertheless, continues with its desperate spin



  19. Links 11/12/2017: Linux 4.15 RC3, Debian 8.10 and Debian 9.3

    Links for the day



  20. Judge Corcoran Turns to His Government for Help and EPO 'House Ban' is Finally Lifted

    Sources that are very reliable say that Patrick Corcoran is coming back to work, however it's now clear when and how long for



  21. Raw: Battistelli's Control/Domination Over the Boards of Appeal

    An old EPO document internally voicing concerns about the lack of independence at the Boards of Appeal



  22. Raw: Conflicts of Interest of EPO Vice-President

    An old EPO concern regarding structural collisions and mixed loyalties



  23. Microsoft-Connected Patent Trolls Are Increasingly Active and Microsoft is Selling 'Protection' (Azure Subscriptions)

    There are several indications that Microsoft-connected shells, which produce no products and are threatening a large number of companies, are inadvertently if not intentionally helping Microsoft sell "indemnification" ("Azure IP Advantage," which echoes the Microsoft/Novell strategy for collecting what they called "patent royalties" one decade ago)



  24. Yes, RPost is Definitely a Patent Troll and Its Software Patents Are at Risk Thanks to Alice

    The latest whitewashing (or reputation-laundering) pieces from Watchtroll, which tries to justify patent-trolling activities with software patents, typically in the Eastern District of Texas



  25. The Latest Scams in the Patent World

    Examples of 'dirty laundry' of the patent microcosm, which it understandably does not like covering (as it harms confidence in their services/advice)



  26. Patents Are Becoming a Welfare System for the Rich and Powerful

    A culture of litigation and more recently the patenting of broad industry standards may mean that multi-billion dollar corporations are cashing in without lifting a finger



  27. Unlike the Mobile Domain, When it Comes to Cars Patent Lawsuits Remain Rare

    An optimistic note regarding the relatively low-temperature legal landscape surrounding advanced automobiles, even though patents are being amassed on software in that domain



  28. The Federal Circuit Rules (Again) in Favour of Section 101/Alice, Koch-Funded CPIP Tries to Overturn Alice at the Supreme Court

    The US Supreme Court's decision on Alice continues to have a profoundly positive impact (except for trolls) and Koch-funded academics try hard to compel the US Supreme Court to reverse/override Alice (so far to no avail)



  29. Next Director of the USPTO Parrots Talking Points of Patent Extremists and Their Lobbyists

    The next USPTO boss (still subject to official confirmation) may be little more than a power grab by the litigation and patenting 'industry', which prioritises not science and technology but its own bottom line



  30. Raw: Three Years for 'Justice' (to be Disregarded by Benoît Battistelli) at ILO and Over a Decade at the EPO

    The delays associated with ‘justice’ at the EPO (usually neither justice nor compliance with rulings) have become so extraordinary that immunity should long ago have been stripped off and Battistelli et al been held accountable


CoPilotCo

RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

CoPilotCo

Recent Posts