EditorsAbout the SiteComes vs. MicrosoftUsing This Web SiteSite ArchivesCredibility IndexOOXMLOpenDocumentPatentsNovellNews DigestSite NewsRSS

09.27.07

Novell’s Linux Business Does NOT Climb Since its Deal with Microsoft (Updated)

Posted in Deception, Finance, GNU/Linux, GPL, Microsoft, Novell at 2:59 pm by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

Don’t judge the health of a 25-year marriage based on the honeymoon

The press if going ga-ga after Justin Steinman’s claim that Novell is doing well despite and because of the deal with Microsoft. But Justin is a PR agent, and the reporters do not bother to perform a quick and independent sanity check.

I was going to write more about this tomorrow because I’m submitting my thesis today (didn’t have any free time), but while the press is blindly spreading such disinformation, I can’t help it anymore. To keep this short, watch what we said just days ago and follow the links therein. It’s clear that while Steinman says:

“The affect on sales year over year, for Novell’s first three quarters of our fiscal year, which ends Oct. 31 — our Linux business was up 243%”

Ron Hovsepian confusedThe reality is (from last week’s news): “As Linux sales slowed in subsequent quarters — from year-over-year growth of 659 percent to 114 percent to 95 percent — executives have backed away from espousing the importance of Linux orders to Novell’s overall business strategy.

This comes from the article, “One year after Microsoft deal, Novell’s Linux sales growth slows,” which shows that Novell/Microsoft’s quota of SUSE coupons has almost been exceeded and the ‘gift’ (as in “Greek bearing gift”) runs out. We have covered many such articles and this one just happens to be the most recent. The articles are consistent, and it’s a damn shame that ComputerWorld decided to blindly project (or echo) Novell’s PR pitch.

Quick temporary boosts cannot be described as a climb, especially when they involve an ill reliance on a fierce rival, which has already backstabbed Novell.

There is some similar misinterpretation about the GPLv3 at the moment, with figures that come from Evans Data. Keep on eye only on Palamida, which shows that GPLv3 adoption keeps climbing.

Update: another source agrees. Hours after we had posted this item. the following was posted elsewhere.

Details Needed On Novell’s Allegedly Soaring Linux Sales

Slashdot is linking to a story supposedly showing that Novell’s Linux business has seen amazing growth in the nine months since they signed a controversial patent deal with Microsoft. “The affect on sales year over year, for Novell’s first three quarters of our fiscal year, which ends Oct. 31 — our Linux business was up 243 percent year over year,” said Novell exec Justin Steinman. But so far, at least, this growth doesn’t appear to be reflected in Novell’s financial results. If my math is right, Novell’s revenue for “Linux platform products” totaled $32 million in the first three quarters of 2006, while the total for the first three quarters of 2007 is $53 million.

Once again, Novell’s PR spins like a ballerina. I’ve left a comment in Slashdot.

Share this post: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • co.mments
  • DZone
  • email
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • NewsVine
  • Print
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Facebook

If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

Pages that cross-reference this one

16 Comments

  1. Harsh Chaudhry said,

    September 28, 2007 at 9:55 am

    Gravatar

    Could you please provide a permalink to the slashdot story?

  2. NoDough said,

    September 28, 2007 at 10:16 am

    Gravatar

    It’s interesting that you use math to validate your posts. Let’s use some math on the figures you provide above as evidence of slowed Linux sales.

    We’ll start with some arbitrary number to use as Novell’s Linux sales, say 10,000 units. Then we’ll apply the year-over-year growth numbers you show above.

    10,000 + 659% = 75,900 an increase of 65,900 units
    75,900 + 114% = 162,426 an increase of 86,526 units
    162,426 + 95% = 316,731 an increase of 154,305 units

    I’m sorry, explain to me again how this is a slowdown in sales.

  3. Duncan said,

    September 28, 2007 at 10:58 am

    Gravatar

    @NoDough:

    You aren’t familiar with corporate financial reports, are you?

    It works like this. Typically, a corporation may do half of its business in a single quarter. As an easy example, for retailers at least here in the US, that’s normally the quarter before Christmas. It follows that for such retailers, the quarter after Christmas is often much smaller than the previous quarter, even if they are growing. Likewise, a tax services business will do probably 80 or 90 percent of its business in a single quarter, over 50 percent in a single month, the one taxes are due.

    The comparison is thus much more accurate if done against the same period last year, thus accounting for seasonal variations. Each quarter is compared against the same quarter the previous year, not against the previous quarter.

    Thus, your math above is based upon an invalid assumption. Each quarter is compared against the same quarter a year ago, and we have the first quarter up 659% against the year ago quarter, the second quarter up only 114%, the third up only 95%. The trend is clear, and if it contiinues, first quarter next year will be negative several hundred percent even if the base growth continues, because most of this year’s figure for that quarter was the one-time boost in sales from MS. (I’ve not bothered doing the specific math.)

    Duncan

  4. NoDough said,

    September 28, 2007 at 11:12 am

    Gravatar

    Duncan,

    We are having a good laugh at your expense on a forum I frequent. May I have your permission to post your explanation there? It’ll have them ROFLTAO.

  5. Mickey Mouse said,

    September 28, 2007 at 12:44 pm

    Gravatar

    >> The trend is clear, and if it contiinues, first quarter next year will be negative several hundred percent even if the base growth continues, because most of this year’s figure for that quarter was the one-time boost in sales from MS.

  6. Mickey Mouse said,

    September 28, 2007 at 12:45 pm

    Gravatar

    >> The trend is clear, and if it contiinues, first quarter next year will be negative several hundred percent even if the base growth continues, because most of this year’s figure for that quarter was the one-time boost in sales from MS.

    Negative several hundred percent growth, huh? That would be a severe problem for any business indeed.

    Actually, things are even worse for Novell than you have stated. At that rate, they’re going to have to pay other companies to take their Linux products. Yes, that’s right, due to the deal with Microsoft, they’ll have to pay $5000 an installation.

    Of course, that leads to the problem that demand for Novell’s Linux will skyrocket if they’re paying companies to take it, so let’s say they get 100,000 orders next quarter. That will be a loss of $500,000,000 in just one quarter!

    Gee, how wonderful is the liberty that we get with this site! When you can just write down anything you want and pretend it makes sense, life is really interesting! The FSF could learn a thing or two about freedom. How about adding a fifth freedom to the GPL that says your software can do anything you want it to do, so long as your desires are sincere.

    As always, they made a deal with Microsoft, so if it’s anti-Novell, it must be correct.

  7. Lawrence said,

    September 28, 2007 at 1:22 pm

    Gravatar

    @NoDough,

    I am an impartial bystander. Could you please explan why you think that Duncan’s logic is flawed. It makes sense to me, though I am certainly no expert. Thanks.

  8. Mickey Mouse said,

    September 28, 2007 at 2:12 pm

    Gravatar

    Lawerence:

    If your salary increased by 95% last year, you would not say you took a pay cut because it tripled the previous year. If he wants to make a point, he should show factually that without the boost of the Microsoft coupons, Novell would have *less* Linux revenue than it has now.

    That would be a lot more enlightening than speculation about trends in growth rates being interpolated into the future. The average temperature climbs about 40 degrees here from January to July. Therefore by December the average temperature should surely be 125 degrees.

    In calculus terms, he’s confusing his derivatives.

  9. antikristian said,

    September 28, 2007 at 2:41 pm

    Gravatar

    You do know you are reprinting MS bought FUD… I’m just waiting for the Con colivas and TCO punchlines…

  10. Mickey Mouse said,

    September 28, 2007 at 3:01 pm

    Gravatar

    >> You do know you are reprinting MS bought FUD

    There is nothing on this site that is not anti-Linux FUD. Microsoft only wishes someone actually cared about this site.

  11. NoDough said,

    September 28, 2007 at 3:03 pm

    Gravatar

    Lawrence,

    In my opinion, Roy and Duncan are using numbers in a dishonest way to support their anti-Novell bias. My grandmother used to say, “Figures never lie. But liars often figure.”

    In Duncan’s post he attempts to debunk my debunking by pointing out that my calculations are linear while the percentage increases are non-linear. He has a point, but it does not validate Roy’s original hypothesis (which, by the way, is also linear.)

    Here’s the original hypothesis.
    Base facts
    Q1 2006 – Q1 2007 saw 659% growth.
    Q2 2006 – Q2 2007 saw 114% growth.
    Q3 2006 – Q3 2007 saw 95% growth.
    Extrapolation
    Decline in growth will continue at the current rate, therefore…
    Q4 2006 – Q4 2007 will see ~ 0% growth.
    Q1 2007 – A1 2008 will see ~ -100% growth.

    Looks very logical, doesn’t it? But it’s FUD.

    The first problem with these numbers is, as I pointed out in my first post, each percentage of growth number has a different base from which to begin. If you have one customer, 600% growth is relatively easy to achieve and not very impressive. (Wow! A whole six customer increase!) However, if you have 100,000 customers then 100% growth is quite impressive indeed. So, without the actual base figures, the percentages mean nothing.

    In order to do a true trend analysis, you would have to have the actual growth figures, not percentages.

    Mind you, I am no defender of the MS/Novell deal. Frankly, I couldn’t care less if Roy and Duncan want to criticize them for making the deal. However, when they start manipulating numbers to manufacture FUD just to make their point… well, then I have a problem with it.

  12. Roy Schestowitz said,

    September 28, 2007 at 4:37 pm

    Gravatar

    @Duncan: you beat me to it with the explanation. I was just about to respond in the same way after I had read NoDough interpretation. Coupons don’t last forever, and it shows.

    @Harsh Chaudhry: the Slashdot story is here:
    http://linux.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=07/09/27/1239251

  13. Stu said,

    September 28, 2007 at 9:16 pm

    Gravatar

    Let’s all boycott Novell (owns more patents than any other linux vendor), and when they lose enough money, they will have a patent firesale to try to stay afloat. The high bidder on all those patents will of course be, Microsoft. Absolutely brilliant.

  14. Roy Schestowitz said,

    September 28, 2007 at 9:45 pm

    Gravatar

    Stu, don’t forget their ownership of “UNIX” and never underestimate the scale of acquisitions Microsoft can get away with. Your argument still relies on this far-fetched scenario.

  15. Open Honesty said,

    April 24, 2008 at 3:50 pm

    Gravatar

    The one thing you have to remember is that open source leads to new things and concepts. Just ask Astrum Inc. http://www.astruminc.com what astrum did was to develop the first SUSE based Solution Stack using Novell technology. What they produced and what the independent testing reported was a beast of an appliance and Astrum published the reports on it’s website was the first ever Identity based encryption system that can target users who have access to critical data or compliant data and harden policies that are compliance mandated and lock them down in the appliance and integrate a eDirectory based HSM encryption card and develop a key management system that never exposes any part of the key. Hence this makes it the only solution to meet the up coming FIPS 3 compliance changes and make this appliance very unique in the market space.
    The problem:
    The concept was presented to Novell under NDA two years ago in 2006 and promises where made protection agreements signed and software groups worked with to ensure no competitive issues may arise. They did not! So Astrum shared with Novell executives the plan that at the end of the day would map 8 of the PCI requirements to the appliance and all Novell products could sit on top. What happened is Astrum became the first ever to develop and Novell based solution stack using SUSE enterprise in a appliance only to have it stolen from them!.. Hence the following links.
    http://sev.prnewswire.com/computer-electronics/20080416/AQW05816042008-1.html
    http://www.novell.com/linux2/appliance/
    Hence, who would expose there concept to a company who will steal it if it has enough market impact and that has ability to change a business direction for a major software company like Astrum did for Novell. Prior to 07 Novell couldn’t spell compliance much less understand an appliance?
    Develop for Novell on SUSE or jeOS, NO WAY!!!

  16. mass-carpone said,

    April 25, 2008 at 1:48 am

    Gravatar

    Sources?

    As I read it you only repeat your theoretical argument as to why Novell’s Linux businnes SHOULDN’T have grown.

    Where is anything new, where are sources that support you claim?

What Else is New


  1. Immunity of the European Patent Office and Lack of Oversight Within the Organisation Mean That It's a Rogue Entity Above the Law

    In light of remarks from the Attorney General in the Netherlands and in light of some recent and highly disturbing developments (like Board 28 folding for Benoît Battistelli), it is increasingly apparent that the EPO is disconnected from any accountability whatsoever



  2. Benoît Battistelli and Team UPC Are at War With European Democracy, Which They View as an Obstacle to Money and Power

    Some of the latest hints of the vain attitude which EPO managers and UPC-leaning law firms have adopted, as part of their plan to impose the UPC on Europe in spite of public resistance (or apathy due to lack of information and consultation)



  3. Links 1/10/2016: Linux 4.7.6 and 4.4.23, Blender 2.78

    Links for the day



  4. Dutch Court Rules Against SUEPO (in a Reversal), But EPO Management Would Have Ignored the Ruling Even If SUEPO Won (Updated)

    SUEPO loses a case against EPO management, but the EPO's overzealous management was going to ignore the ruling anyway



  5. New Paper Provides Evidence of Sinking Patent Quality at the EPO, Refuting the Liar in Chief Battistelli

    In spite of Battistelli's claims (lies) about patent quality under his watch, reality suggests that so-called 'production' is simply rushed issuance of invalid patents (one step away from rubberstamping, in order to meet unreasonable, imposed-from-the-top targets)



  6. Battistelli Locks EPO Staff Union Out of Social Conference So That He Can Lie About the Union and the Social Climate

    The attacks on staff of the EPO carry on, with brainwash sessions meticulously scheduled to ensure that Administrative Council delegates are just their master's voice, or the voice of the person whom they are in principle supposed to oversee



  7. Unprecedented Levels of UPC Lobbying by Big Business Europe (Multinationals) and Their Patent Law Firms

    A quick look at some of the latest deception which is intended to bamboozle European politicians and have them play along with the unitary [sic] patent for private interests of the super-rich



  8. Links 29/9/2016: Russia Moving to FOSS, New Nmap and PostgreSQL Releases

    Links for the day



  9. Team UPC is Interjecting Itself Into the Media Ahead of Tomorrow's Lobbying Push Against the European Council and Against European Interests

    A quick look at the growing bulk of UPC lobbying (by the legal firms which stand to benefit from it) ahead of tomorrow's European Council meeting which is expected to discuss a unitary patent system



  10. IP Kat is Lobbying Heavily for the UPC, Courtesy of Team UPC

    When does an IP (or patent) blog become little more than an aggregation of interest groups and self-serving patent law firms, whose agenda overlaps that of Team Battistelli?



  11. Leaked: Conclusions of the Secretive EPO Board 28 Meeting (8th of September 2016)

    The agenda and outcome of the secretive meeting of the Board of the Administrative Council of the EPO



  12. Letter From the Dutch Institute of Patent Attorneys (Nederlandse Orde van Octrooigemachtigden) to the Administrative Council of the EPO

    The Netherlands Institute of Patent Attorneys, a group representing a large number of Dutch patent practitioners, is against Benoît Battistelli and his horrible behaviour at the European Patent Office (EPO)



  13. EPO's Board 28 Notes Battistelli's “Three Current Investigations/Disciplinary Proceedings Involving SUEPO Members in The Hague."

    The attack on SUEPO (EPO staff representatives) at The Hague appears to have been silently expanded to a third person, showing an obvious increase in Battistelli's attacks on truth-tellers



  14. Links 28/9/2016: Alpine Linux 3.4.4, Endless OS 3.0

    Links for the day



  15. Cementing Autocracy: The European Patent Office Against Democracy, Against Media, and Against the Rule of Law

    The European Patent Office (EPO) actively undermines democracy in Europe, it undermines the freedom of the press (by paying it for puff pieces), and it undermines the rule of law by giving one single tyrant total power in Eponia and immunity from outside Eponia (even when he breaks his own rules)



  16. Links 28/9/2016: New Red Hat Offices, Fedora 25 'Frozen'

    Links for the day



  17. Team Battistelli Intensifies the Attack on the Boards of Appeal Again

    The lawless state of the EPO, where the rule of law is basically reducible to Battistelli's ego and insecurities, is again demonstrated with an escalation and perhaps another fake 'trial' in the making (after guilt repeatedly fails to be established)



  18. After the EPO Paid the Financial Times to Produce Propaganda the Newspaper Continues to Produce UPC Puff Pieces, Just Ahead of EU Council Meeting

    How the media, including the Financial Times, has been used (and even paid!) by the EPO in exchange for self-serving (to the EPO) messages and articles



  19. Beware the Patent Law Firms Insinuating That Software Patents Are Back Because of McRO

    By repeatedly claiming (and then generalising) that CAFC accepted a software patent the patent microcosm (meta-industry) hopes to convince us that we should continue to pursue software patents in the US, i.e. pay them a lot more money for something of little/no value



  20. The US Supreme Court Might Soon Tighten Patent Scope in the United States Even Further, the USPTO Produces Patent Maximalism Propaganda

    A struggle brewing between the patent 'industry' (profiting from irrational saturation) and the highest US court, as well as the Government Accountability Office (GAO)



  21. Patent Trolling a Growing Problem in East Asia (Software Patents Also), Whereas in the US the Problem Goes Away Along With Software Patents

    A look at two contrasting stories, one in Asia where patent litigation and hype are on the rise (same in Europe due to the EPO) and another in the US where a lot of patents face growing uncertainty and a high invalidation rate



  22. The EPO's Continued Push for Software Patents, Marginalisation of Appeals (Reassessment), and Deviation From the EPC

    A roundup of new developments at the EPO, where things further exacerbate and patent quality continues its downward spiral



  23. The Battistelli Effect: “We Will be Gradually Forced to File Our Patent Applications Outside the EPO in the Interests of Our Clients”

    While the EPO dusts off old files and grants in haste without quality control (won't be sustainable for more than a couple more years) the applicants are moving away as trust in the EPO erodes rapidly and profoundly



  24. Links 27/9/2016: Lenovo Layoffs, OPNFV Third Software Release

    Links for the day



  25. The Moral Depravity of the European Patent Office Under Battistelli

    The European Patent Office (EPO) comes under heavy criticism from its very own employees, who also seem to recognise that lobbying for the UPC is a very bad idea which discredits the European Patent Organisation



  26. Links 26/9/2016: Linux 4.8 RC8, SuperTux 0.5

    Links for the day



  27. What Insiders Are Saying About the Sad State of the European Patent Office (EPO)

    Anonymous claims made by people who are intimately familiar with the European Patent Office (from the inside) shed light on how bad things have become



  28. The EPO Does Not Want Skilled (and 'Expensive') Staff, Layoffs a Growing Concern

    A somewhat pessimistic look (albeit increasingly realistic look) at the European Patent Office, where unions are under fire for raising legitimate concerns about the direction taken by the management since a largely French team was put in charge



  29. Patents Roundup: Accenture Software Patents, Patent Troll Against Apple, Willful Infringements, and Apple Against a Software Patent

    A quick look at various new articles of interest (about software patents) and what can be deduced from them, especially now that software patents are the primary barrier to Free/Libre Open Source software adoption



  30. Software Patents Propped Up by Patent Law Firms That Are Lying, Further Assisted by Rogue Elements Like David Kappos and Randall Rader (Revolving Doors)

    The sheer dishonesty of the patent microcosm (seeking to bring back software patents by misleading the public) and those who are helping this microcosm change the system from the inside, owing to intimate connections from their dubious days inside government


CoPilotCo

RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

CoPilotCo

Recent Posts