EditorsAbout the SiteComes vs. MicrosoftUsing This Web SiteSite ArchivesCredibility IndexOOXMLOpenDocumentPatentsNovellNews DigestSite NewsRSS
Boycott Novell

10.22.07

Novell-like Terms, Without the Deal… Now 93% Off RRP

Posted in Europe, America, Asia, Courtroom, Antitrust, Interoperability at 9:18 am by Roy Schestowitz

Worth the wait? Regular retail price (RRP) is no more

Documentation for interoperability has become the central point of debate in Europe. We expected some of this to become available for free of charge, but after Neelie Kroes spoke to Steve Ballmer on the phone, it turns out that there’s somewhat of a settlement in Europe (no appeal). Here are the details.

It will also allow that data to go to open source companies such as Linux, and will cut the price it charges for worldwide licenses — including patents — to less than 7 percent of what Microsoft originally claimed.

Three big questions still remain:

  1. What will it be in Korea after Microsoft dropped its appeal?
  2. What will happen in America as more and more states are finally waking up to see the abuse?
  3. Why is Microsoft allowed to charge money after deliberately deviating from standards? As the following new article shows, Microsoft intends to continue with an “‘independent’ path”.

Speaking to the Web 2.0 Summit in San Francisco, Ballmer would not comment directly on any potential acquisitions, but he said Microsoft’s current focus is the “independent path.”

“If at some point it makes sense, maybe then it makes sense. But that’s not where we are going. We are driving in an independent direction,” said Ballmer in a question-and-answer session.

How much will companies be charged to interoperate because standards will be ignored and conceded (backed by the power of takeovers)?

If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channel.

Pages that cross-reference this one

Listed from October 23rd 2007 onwards, pingbacks and trackbacks (external) are omitted

Leave a Comment

An invade, divide, and conquer Grand Plan

Novell CEO Ron HovsepianHighlight: Novell was the first to acknowledge that Microsoft FUD tactics had substance. Novell then used anti-Linux FUD to market itself. Learn more

Xandros founderHighlight: Xandros let Microsoft make patent claims and brag about (paid-for) OOXML support. Learn more

Linspire CEO Kevin CarmonyHighlight: Linspire's CEO not only fell into Microsoft arms, but he also assisted the company's attack on GNU/Linux. Learn more

Hand with moneyHighlight: Microsoft craves pseudo (proprietary) standards and gets its way using proxies and influence which it buys. Learn more

Eric RaymondHighlight: The invasion into the open source world is intended to leave Linux companies neglected, due to financial incentives from Microsoft. Learn more

XenSource CEOAnalysis: Xen, an open source hypervisor, possibly fell victim to Microsoft's aggressive (and stealthy) acquisition-by-proxy strategy. Learn more

More analysis >>

Recent Posts