EditorsAbout the SiteComes vs. MicrosoftUsing This Web SiteSite ArchivesCredibility IndexOOXMLOpenDocumentPatentsNovellNews DigestSite NewsRSS
Boycott Novell

12.08.07

A Dozen Words Show Why Linspire Just ‘Gets’ Linux

Posted in Microsoft, GNU/Linux, Intellectual Property, FOSS, Linspire at 11:51 pm by Roy Schestowitz

From the Publisher Program benefits at Linspire:

  • Protect your software and IP

Present EULA requirements or deliver activation keys.

A quick look at the status and the address bar confirms that this is not a case of cross-site scripting involving microsoft.com. This is Linspire.

Activation key, EULAs, and oh dear! “Intellectual property”, which is a big no-no. It’s somewhat similar to calling copyright infringers “thieves”, “pirates” or — as the head of the MPAA put it the other day — “criminals”. Remember the “high-brow pirates” remark from Linspire’s former CEO? It didn’t work out too well.

Even Freespire, by the way, is subjected to terms which can raise a brow.

Lindows

If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channel.

Pages that cross-reference this one

Listed from October 23rd 2007 onwards, pingbacks and trackbacks (external) are omitted

4 Comments »

  1. Dude said,

    December 9, 2007 at 3:32 am

    Are you saying that any commercial software that requires an activation code is evil? You do understand that there is a whole world of Linux based software that isn’t open source…Transgaming, CrossOver Office, Win4Lin, Parallels and the list goes on. Are you saying these software vendors are evil because they charge money and use activation codes?

  2. Roy Schestowitz said,

    December 9, 2007 at 4:15 am

    I’d never use the word “evil”, so putting that word in my mouth isn’t necessary. I pointed out that it’s not Free software, that’s all.

  3. Victor Soliz said,

    December 9, 2007 at 6:38 am

    I think making a debian redistribution and making it require an activation code is evil. It’s supposed to be free software…

  4. Roy Schestowitz said,

    December 10, 2007 at 3:12 am

    Linspire entire business model is based on CNR, which I suppose you can now argue is Free software. Here is a relatively recent video where Welch explains the role of CNR, among many other things.

Leave a Comment

An invade, divide, and conquer Grand Plan

Novell CEO Ron HovsepianHighlight: Novell was the first to acknowledge that Microsoft FUD tactics had substance. Novell then used anti-Linux FUD to market itself. Learn more

Xandros founderHighlight: Xandros let Microsoft make patent claims and brag about (paid-for) OOXML support. Learn more

Linspire CEO Kevin CarmonyHighlight: Linspire's CEO not only fell into Microsoft arms, but he also assisted the company's attack on GNU/Linux. Learn more

Hand with moneyHighlight: Microsoft craves pseudo (proprietary) standards and gets its way using proxies and influence which it buys. Learn more

Eric RaymondHighlight: The invasion into the open source world is intended to leave Linux companies neglected, due to financial incentives from Microsoft. Learn more

XenSource CEOAnalysis: Xen, an open source hypervisor, possibly fell victim to Microsoft's aggressive (and stealthy) acquisition-by-proxy strategy. Learn more

More analysis >>

Recent Posts