EditorsAbout the SiteComes vs. MicrosoftUsing This Web SiteSite ArchivesCredibility IndexOOXMLOpenDocumentPatentsNovellNews DigestSite NewsRSS
Boycott Novell

01.30.08

Glyn Moody Against Intellectual Monopoly (aka Patents)

Posted in Patents, Europe at 7:55 am by Roy Schestowitz

Glyn truly stands out from the crowd as far as patent issues are concerned [1, 2, 3. Here in the UK, patent laws and volume of lawsuits seem not to have gone as bad as they already are in the States, but there is concern that this may change if a US-style law is adopted here. Here is Glyn’s latest writeup about what he consistently calls “intellectual monopoly”, in line with Richard Stallman’s own perspective.

Many – including myself - believe that a better description of copyright and patents is to call them “intellectual monopolies”, since they are just that: state-granted monopolies that give the power to exclude others from using certain kinds of ideas.

Once you move away from the loaded “intellectual property”, you can examine objectively whether such intellectual monopolies are, in fact, beneficial for society – both in terms of those holding them, and those who must operate with them.

A few days ago we referred to the appalling news from over here in the UK where software patents received validity. Relevant parts of the press are flooded with this news at the moment. Here’s one example:

It looks like the UK is about to make the same dangerous mistake that US courts made a while back. A decision there has now stated that the Patent Office shouldn’t automatically reject patent apps on software.

The only encouraging aspect of the news is that there is still opportunity to appeal this decision, so it might not be quite so final and irreversible. The best one can do at this stage is raise this issue to make opposition more loud.

If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channel.

Pages that cross-reference this one

Listed from October 23rd 2007 onwards, pingbacks and trackbacks (external) are omitted

Leave a Comment

An invade, divide, and conquer Grand Plan

Novell CEO Ron HovsepianHighlight: Novell was the first to acknowledge that Microsoft FUD tactics had substance. Novell then used anti-Linux FUD to market itself. Learn more

Xandros founderHighlight: Xandros let Microsoft make patent claims and brag about (paid-for) OOXML support. Learn more

Linspire CEO Kevin CarmonyHighlight: Linspire's CEO not only fell into Microsoft arms, but he also assisted the company's attack on GNU/Linux. Learn more

Hand with moneyHighlight: Microsoft craves pseudo (proprietary) standards and gets its way using proxies and influence which it buys. Learn more

Eric RaymondHighlight: The invasion into the open source world is intended to leave Linux companies neglected, due to financial incentives from Microsoft. Learn more

XenSource CEOAnalysis: Xen, an open source hypervisor, possibly fell victim to Microsoft's aggressive (and stealthy) acquisition-by-proxy strategy. Learn more

More analysis >>

Recent Posts