02.10.08
Closer Than You Think: Microsoft and Novell Collaborations
Novell and Microsoft truly are close. As the industry loses its temperature (recession), Novell keeps its body close to Microsoft and hopes to receive some warmth in return. It does so much to please the Beast, but the same kind of love rarely comes back. To give very recent examples:
- Here is Novell inviting Microsoft to supercomputers, where GNU/Linux enjoys a market share of over 90%
- Here is Novell pretty much marketing Windows Vista
The last time I checked, Microsoft’s only pages about GNU/Linux are the anti-Linux campaign and instructions/knowledgebase articles about “How to Remove Linux and Install Windows”. Remember that shortly after it had signed the deal with Microsoft, Novell removed pages from its Web site if these were critical of Windows or Microsoft.
Looking at news from the past week, you will find that Microsoft and Novell have just forged another technical collaboration.
He told a media briefing here today that Microsoft will make available its User Interface Automation (UIA) specification, which is an advanced accessibility framework that simplifies the development of assistive technology products for people with one or more disabilities.
Another new article talks about Novell and Microsoft working together (with seclusion of course) in a so-called research lab.
In September 2007, Microsoft and Waltham-based Novell Inc. announced the opening of a joint laboratory in Cambridge to resolve interoperability issues between proprietary software and open-source software. The laboratory, part of an agreement Novell and Microsoft announced in November 2006, is located in Novell’s Kendall Square facility.
Make no mistake. This is not of any benefit to GNU/Linux. It’s all about SUSE Linux. It helps Microsoft combat open standards [1, 2, 3].
Matt Asay, also rather frustrated with the mess Novell is in, agrees that Novell might as well just become the open-source .NET kingdom of Microsoft.
Novell has struggled to compete in the open-source world. Combining with Microsoft hasn’t helped. So why not, as Dave suggests, link up with Microsoft’s .Net code to build an ecosystem around it that would complement Microsoft’s own efforts to do so?
[…]
Let’s face it: there are still hordes of developers out there who love Microsoft and would probably prefer to create open-source projects around .Net instead of Java or the LAMP stack. Novell could orchestrate this since Microsoft appears to have a PR problem with doing so.
As long as Novell continues with its Mono agenda [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13], it appears to be losing confidence everywhere you look in the Linux world (Slashdot, LinuxToday and so forth). It was a bad gamble and a very poor way of distinguishing itself. Who will be held accountable at the end? █
Highlight: Novell was the first to acknowledge that Microsoft FUD tactics had substance. Novell then used anti-Linux FUD to market itself. 
Highlight: Xandros let Microsoft make patent claims and brag about (paid-for) OOXML support. 
Highlight: Linspire's CEO not only fell into Microsoft arms, but he also assisted the company's attack on GNU/Linux. 
Highlight: Microsoft craves pseudo (proprietary) standards and gets its way using proxies and influence which it buys. 
Highlight: The invasion into the open source world is intended to leave Linux companies neglected, due to financial incentives from Microsoft. 
Analysis: Xen, an open source hypervisor, possibly fell victim to Microsoft's aggressive (and stealthy) acquisition-by-proxy strategy.