EditorsAbout the SiteComes vs. MicrosoftUsing This Web SiteSite ArchivesCredibility IndexOOXMLOpenDocumentPatentsNovellNews DigestSite NewsRSS
Boycott Novell

02.27.08

Quick Mention: Novell’s Mono Evolves and Approaches Evolution

Posted in Novell, Mono, GNOME, FOSS at 6:16 am by Roy Schestowitz

It was a few months ago that Miguel de Icaza spoke abut the possibility of Mono extensions for Evolution. Consider the following an important update from him:

“Update: Jeff wrote an add-in for MonoDevelop to do Evolution plugins in C#.”

It seems like the gradual evolution of GNOME. The issue here is that it’s a route to dependency where a crucial application (already used by many) is involved. People become ‘hooked’ on plugins.

See this hours-old post for more information about our concern. Evolution is Free software. Let’s not turn into to Fee software.

A bad penguin -- Novell

If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channel.

Pages that cross-reference this one

Listed from October 23rd 2007 onwards, pingbacks and trackbacks (external) are omitted

6 Comments »

  1. CoolGuy said,

    February 27, 2008 at 8:52 am

    http://tirania.org/blog//texts/patents.html

    Microsoft has granted RAND+Royalty Free licenses to any patents they might own that are required to implement the ECMA 334/335 standards. So at least our core VM, classes and compilers are safe from any litigation from *Microsoft*.

    When did they say that ?

  2. Rui Miguel Silva Seabra said,

    February 27, 2008 at 9:46 am

    They said it in here:

    http://www.microsoft.com/interop/principles/osspatentpledge.mspx

    Where they also redefine OpenSource to be:
    0. non commercial
    1. freely redistributed
    2. freely modified
    3. source code published

  3. Rui Miguel Silva Seabra said,

    February 27, 2008 at 9:47 am

    Which makes Miguel, what? I have a word for that…

  4. Rui Miguel Silva Seabra said,

    February 27, 2008 at 9:48 am

    Might begin with ‘Se’, ends in ‘Out’ and has ‘ll-’ in the middle, but I don’t promise this is what I’m thinking about…

  5. Roy Schestowitz said,

    February 27, 2008 at 9:53 am

    Rui, I’ve just posted this clarification.

  6. Mark Fink said,

    March 1, 2008 at 3:47 pm

    Figures that Jeff Waugh lied about how GNOME would never depend on Mono.

Leave a Comment

An invade, divide, and conquer Grand Plan

Novell CEO Ron HovsepianHighlight: Novell was the first to acknowledge that Microsoft FUD tactics had substance. Novell then used anti-Linux FUD to market itself. Learn more

Xandros founderHighlight: Xandros let Microsoft make patent claims and brag about (paid-for) OOXML support. Learn more

Linspire CEO Kevin CarmonyHighlight: Linspire's CEO not only fell into Microsoft arms, but he also assisted the company's attack on GNU/Linux. Learn more

Hand with moneyHighlight: Microsoft craves pseudo (proprietary) standards and gets its way using proxies and influence which it buys. Learn more

Eric RaymondHighlight: The invasion into the open source world is intended to leave Linux companies neglected, due to financial incentives from Microsoft. Learn more

XenSource CEOAnalysis: Xen, an open source hypervisor, possibly fell victim to Microsoft's aggressive (and stealthy) acquisition-by-proxy strategy. Learn more

More analysis >>

Recent Posts