03.01.08
Quick Mention: Miguel de Icaza @ Microsoft (Updated)
The other hat
He’s there and the enthusiastic reaction in his blog shows he is very proud of it.
Just something minor to keep in mind… █
Update: a friend has just informed me of a very timely quote.
“At Microsoft I learned the truth about ActiveX and COM and I got very interested in it immediately.”
–Miguel de Icaza




Highlight: Novell was the first to acknowledge that Microsoft FUD tactics had substance. Novell then used anti-Linux FUD to market itself.
Highlight: Xandros let Microsoft make patent claims and brag about (paid-for) OOXML support.
Highlight: Linspire's CEO not only fell into Microsoft arms, but he also assisted the company's attack on GNU/Linux.
Highlight: Microsoft craves pseudo (proprietary) standards and gets its way using proxies and influence which it buys.
Highlight: The invasion into the open source world is intended to leave Linux companies neglected, due to financial incentives from Microsoft.
Analysis: Xen, an open source hypervisor, possibly fell victim to Microsoft's aggressive (and stealthy) acquisition-by-proxy strategy.
Victor Soliz said,
March 1, 2008 at 7:39 am
Yiuck.
Stephane Rodriguez said,
March 1, 2008 at 8:47 am
The truth he has learned is probably that the COM/ActiveX source code is actually totally cross-platform (Windows and Unix builds), and it’s only proprietary by being very convulated, not straight interfaces with simple semantics.
By the way, if you have $40,000 in your bank, you can purchase the actual COM/ActiveX source code : http://www.opengroup.org/comsource/
Stephane Rodriguez said,
March 1, 2008 at 8:48 am
Typo : “convulated” ==> “convoluted”.
Roy Schestowitz said,
March 1, 2008 at 8:56 am
So, Mr. Ballmer and Mr. Smith, how much will it be for TCP/IP? [sarcasm/]
Daniel said,
March 2, 2008 at 12:59 am
He got interested in ActiveX??
The mind just boggles…
Its the single most stupid idea next to sending raw binaries through the browser.