EditorsAbout the SiteComes vs. MicrosoftUsing This Web SiteSite ArchivesCredibility IndexOOXMLOpenDocumentPatentsNovellNews DigestSite NewsRSS

03.24.08

Summary of Mono’s Danger to GNU/Linux and the Free Desktop

Posted in Debian, Formats, Free/Libre Software, FUD, GNOME, GNU/Linux, Microsoft, Mono, Novell, Open XML, Patents, RAND, Red Hat, Samba, Ubuntu at 3:15 am by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

A look back at evidence may be more compelling a proof than yet another explanation

We have received some mail recently from developers who are concerned about issues that are covered here, including OOXML and Mono. One person, for example, was concerned about pressure on KDE to implement support for OOXML (a big no-no). Coming from Debian, a concerned developer spoke about the problems surrounding Mono. Together, we ought to at least try to inform. Maybe we can help in pushing Debian to reduce its dependency on Mono, which is already present there. (correction/clarification: Mono is not there by default)

Let us quickly accumulate pointers to posts which summarise the problem and use this page as somewhat an index that makes it easy to understand for those unfamiliar with it. The list below is chronological, so better understanding has been formed by the time later posts were published, which makes them more accurate.

The presence of Mono alone should not be the key issue to address. There are legal issues. Upon attempts to demonstrate just loss of identity we were told that it would not be an issue as serious as patent-encumbered (and truly proprietary) elements like OOXML, WMV, etc.

That is indeed an issue. It also makes them more widespread, for all to suffer from.

Further throughout this discussion, the OOXML issue came up. The reader told us:


…what’s your opinion on OOXML support being added to OOo 3? Do you think rubbing it with the GPLv3 [1, 2] might yield some interesting results?


The reply is quoted verbatim:

It works badly for Novell, which is already building ‘Microsoft OpenOffice’ in a sense [1, 2, 3, 4]. Novell hates it when people use the “F” word in this context (“fork”), but it’s becoming more of a reality.

Microsoft hates the GPLv3. In fact, it turns out that GPLv3 got thrown out of Microsoft’s CodePlex. All of Microsoft’s smear campaigns against GPLv3 (through proxies in disguise, such as paid academics) show that Microsoft’s lawyers understand the ramifications.

“They, along with biased journalists who deceive, are totally falling for it.”The company works quite secretly, but understanding the strategy is not hard. Getting the word out and warning developers is another issue (PyCon, Ubuntu, OSI). They, along with biased journalists who deceive, are totally falling for it. It’s like a Big Lie campaign.

Many people are conveniently naive and it was frustrating to find that Michael T agrees with Matt Asay as far as the stance on Bruce Perens goes. He has posted about this to the OSI’s Web site. In other words, they see nothing wrong with Microsoft in the OSI, despite the fact that Ballmer sort of stuttered in an interview last month where he was going to name ‘open source’ as his number one threat. He eventually said “Open.. Linux”. He hesitated and changed his mind as he spoke. He knows that they have to pretend to like Open Source, as long as they can replace and subvert the licences to make them work Microsoft’s way (see notes above about Mono licence). Folks like Walli might already be doing a lot of legwork for Microsoft, trying to convince developers to embrace the Microsoft way, restrict openness, ownership, maybe even apply for software patents, etc.

Just say no to Mono

Share this post: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • co.mments
  • DZone
  • email
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • NewsVine
  • Print
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Facebook

If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

Pages that cross-reference this one

52 Comments

  1. akf said,

    March 24, 2008 at 9:55 am

    Gravatar

    Debian is not dependent to mono. Please read the text you have linked to:

    with the minimum dependencies needed to run F-Spot!

    Of course you need mono to run a mono-application! But F-Spot is not installed automatically and nobody forces you to install it.

    By the way, you’ll get also a lot of .dll and .exe files, when you install wine…

  2. Gryc Ueusp said,

    March 24, 2008 at 11:14 am

    Gravatar

    @akf:
    “But F-Spot is not installed automatically and nobody forces you to install it.”

    Last I heard it’s installed by default on Ubuntu, one of the (if not _the_) largest desktop distros. Oh yeah, not to mention Beagle (GNOME’s OSX search clone) and TomBoy.

    The point of Mono (at least from a person who isnt promoting it for M$) is to provide a compatibility layer for old/legacy windows apps, not to encourage making NEW apps.

    The equivilent is if GNOME started writing programs in C++. And then compiled them for windows and ran them under wine. You’d mock them wouldnt you? You’d call them idiots and that they werent truly open source. Well they would be.

  3. b.bob said,

    March 24, 2008 at 11:30 am

    Gravatar

    Having mono is bad. It nearly killed my sister.

  4. Chris Cox said,

    March 24, 2008 at 11:33 am

    Gravatar

    Worst part is that people are using Mono to replace their implementations of .Net. For example, WinCE doesn’t include a full .Net class implementation. So some of these evil Windows developers are ditching Microsoft .Net’s class libraries and using the ones from Mono instead since they are licensed under the MIT/X11 license.

    Moving forward, it is likely that even the runtime for Mono will get licensed with the MIT/X11 style license instead of the LGPL, which will likely mean that some Windows users will use the Mono runtime instead of the Microsoft one. This may result in an open source product being used by Windows users to run critical applications.

    Additionally, with MonoDevelop now being available even under Windows, it’s possible that more Windows developers will be tempted to use Linux as a development platform (shudder!). This could result in a wider adoption of Linux by Windows users… something we obviously must try to eliminate at all cost.

    Also, those evil Novell folks have created a tool… a tool so evil is has to be stopped. The tool allows one to check their code for Mono compatibility when writing .Net applications. This tool needs to be destroyed as it will only lead to more applications which run on both Windows AND Linux. If we allow these kind of things to continue, the barriers to Linux adoption will only be weakened and that means more people using Linux… a very, very bad thing.

    It is very true that Microsoft has limited some things under non open source licensing… and indeed Mono can use those things with the obvious restrictions… but of course this is NO different that how it is with existing software packages in Linux that also have hooks to use such things (like w32codecs, etc). So I don’t see that as the crux of the matter. Seems to be the idea is to eliminate all Linux use by Windows developers as possible.

    If that means we have to take down Novell… so be it. Linux shines best when used least. Roy for President!!

  5. Roy Schestowitz said,

    March 24, 2008 at 11:55 am

    Gravatar

    You escape the main point. Microsoft wants GNU/Linux converted to a Mac OS equivalent, i.e. an O/S which requires cross-licensing. The strategy is already being implemented (Hyper-V being a recent example). Microsoft openly says that it’s the cost of Linux that’s daunting. If Microsoft can change this, there goes the competitive advantage. Of course, for those at Novell who want to charge $50 per year for use of the O/S, none of this is contradictory.

  6. akf said,

    March 24, 2008 at 12:00 pm

    Gravatar

    @Ueusp: I didn’t try to defend Mono, I tried to defend Debian.

    If Mono was promoted as compatibility layer for Windows apps, I would really like it; just like wine. But if libwine was promoted as environment for writing GNU/Linux apps, I would protest too.

    The problem is the promoted purpose of it.
    The other issue is, how much other software depends on it.

    I only disagree with Schestowitz in the second point. I also think, that a dependency would be really bad, but I don’t think, that dependency is already there.

  7. Alex said,

    March 24, 2008 at 12:08 pm

    Gravatar

    But Mono isn’t the only CLR solution. There is also DotGnu. Which has been careful to avoid all the sorts of problems highlighted in many places. Trouble is for some reason very few people seem to be picking up on it let alone helping improve it.

    Partly I’ll say from my own experience that the documentation to get into is and always has been so poor. I suspect if the available documentation for using DotGnu were as good as the efforts with Mono it would be (have been because I can’t help but feel it may be near to death) a serious alternative. And in benchmarks I’ve run it’s always outperformed Mono on my tasks.

  8. Roy Schestowitz said,

    March 24, 2008 at 12:11 pm

    Gravatar

    akf, I’ve corrected the statement about Debian. Radu gave me the wrong impression about a Mono application being there by default (what about Tomboy, I wondered).

    I only disagree with Schestowitz in the second point. I also think, that a dependency would be really bad, but I don’t think, that dependency is already there.

    By shifting focus away from C++/Java/etc. and diverting everything in favour of Mono you end up with superior applications that are written in Mono. They are more likely to be (pre)packaged, so the practical dependency is there.

    If you put cakes on the table before the appetizers and main course, you are likely to ruin the meal. In this case, the cakes are very fattening. They’ll cost a lot.

  9. Alex said,

    March 24, 2008 at 12:12 pm

    Gravatar

    I have to disagree with Roy Schestowitz on free (low price) being a competitive advantage for Linux or Free Software in general. My experience has been policy makers (cheque signers) don’t trust free and would rather pay.

  10. Roy Schestowitz said,

    March 24, 2008 at 12:14 pm

    Gravatar

    What about the Chinese market where Microsoft must tolerate copyright infringement (remember what gates recently said about competing against Linux)?

  11. CoolGuy said,

    March 24, 2008 at 12:22 pm

    Gravatar

    Trust nothing from Novell after they signed the agreement (sold out) with M$.

  12. akf said,

    March 24, 2008 at 2:03 pm

    Gravatar

    Gee, I think I really made a mistake.

    In Debian Etch there really was no dependency.
    But now I had a look at the new Debian Lenny. There the meta-package “gnome” really installs Tomboy. :-(

    compare
    http://packages.debian.org/etch/gnome
    versus
    http://packages.debian.org/lenny/gnome

    Sorry, I have really seen it just now.

    But that doesn’t mean, that gnome depends on tomboy under debian, it just means, that it is installed as default. But anyway, I’m really disappointed.

  13. Victor Soliz said,

    March 24, 2008 at 4:10 pm

    Gravatar

    Chris Cox: Even if your statements were accurate (and they aren’t, MONO is definitely NOT going to aid more windows converts, and for GOD’s SAKE how would GPL prevent windows developers from using a lib?) It would not be worth it:

    If I had to choose between keeping our current number of Linux users and developers and improving such numbers by windowsifying Linux and making it require us to pay an MS tax, I would go for the less popular Linux option.

  14. Brent R Brian said,

    March 24, 2008 at 6:55 pm

    Gravatar

    GPL already scares a lot of folks that make money off of Intellectual Property … add to that the FACT that Microsoft AGGRESSIVELY protects their IP (remember all the BSA busts years ago, all the measures most companies employ to make sure their licenses are paid for) … getting a call from a M$ lawyer is about as welcome as a call from an IRS auditor.

  15. Roy Schestowitz said,

    March 24, 2008 at 7:12 pm

    Gravatar

    GPL already scares a lot of folks

    I don’t quite agree. That’s often a Microsoft-imposed scare tactic. The same goes for GPLv3.

  16. machiner said,

    March 25, 2008 at 11:50 am

    Gravatar

    “akf said,

    March 24, 2008 at 2:03 pm

    Gee, I think I really made a mistake.

    In Debian Etch there really was no dependency.
    But now I had a look at the new Debian Lenny. There the meta-package “gnome” really installs Tomboy.

    compare
    http://packages.debian.org/etch/gnome
    versus
    http://packages.debian.org/lenny/gnome

    Sorry, I have really seen it just now.

    But that doesn’t mean, that gnome depends on tomboy under debian, it just means, that it is installed as default. But anyway, I’m really disappointed.”

    Installing the metapackage “gnome” will cetainly add mono, as well as Tomboy:

    abiword-gnome{a} abiword-plugins-gnome{a} alacarte{a} at-spi{a}
    binfmt-support{a} bug-buddy{a} capplets-data{a} cli-common{a} dasher{a}
    dasher-data{a} deskbar-applet{a} dia-common{a} dia-gnome{a} dia-libs{a}
    dmz-cursor-theme{a} ekiga{a} eog{a} epiphany-browser{a}
    epiphany-browser-data{a} epiphany-extensions{a} epiphany-gecko{a}
    espeak{a} espeak-data{a} evolution{a} evolution-common{a}
    evolution-data-server{a} evolution-data-server-common{a}
    evolution-plugins{a} evolution-webcal{a} fam{a}
    fast-user-switch-applet{a} freeglut3{a} gcalctool{a} gconf-editor{a}
    gda2-postgres{a} gdb{a} gdm{a} gdm-themes{a} gedit{a} gedit-common{a}
    ggzcore-bin{a} gnome gnome-about{a} gnome-accessibility-themes{a}
    gnome-applets{a} gnome-applets-data{a} gnome-backgrounds{a}
    gnome-cards-data{a} gnome-control-center{a} gnome-core{a}
    gnome-cups-manager{a} gnome-desktop-data{a} gnome-desktop-environment{a}
    gnome-doc-utils{a} gnome-games{a} gnome-games-data{a}
    gnome-games-extra-data{a} gnome-keyring-manager{a} gnome-mag{a}
    gnome-media{a} gnome-media-common{a} gnome-menus{a}
    gnome-netstatus-applet{a} gnome-nettool{a} gnome-office{a} gnome-orca{a}
    gnome-panel{a} gnome-panel-data{a} gnome-pilot{a} gnome-pilot-conduits{a}
    gnome-power-manager{a} gnome-screensaver{a} gnome-session{a}
    gnome-system-monitor{a} gnome-system-tools{a} gnome-terminal{a}
    gnome-terminal-data{a} gnome-themes{a} gnome-user-guide{a} gnome-utils{a}
    gnome-volume-manager{a} gnuchess{a} gnuchess-book{a} gok{a}
    gstreamer0.10-ffmpeg{a} gstreamer0.10-gnomevfs{a}
    gstreamer0.10-plugins-ugly{a} gstreamer0.10-tools{a} gthumb{a}
    gthumb-data{a} gtkhtml3.14{a} gucharmap{a} guile-1.8-libs{a} inkscape{a}
    iso-codes{a} libart2.0-cil{a} libatspi1.0-0{a} libbeagle1{a}
    libbrlapi0.5{a} libcairomm-1.0-1{a} libcamel1.2-10{a} libcolorblind0{a}
    libcpufreq0{a} libebook1.2-9{a} libecal1.2-7{a} libedata-book1.2-2{a}
    libedata-cal1.2-6{a} libedataserver1.2-9{a} libedataserverui1.2-8{a}
    libegroupwise1.2-13{a} libelf1{a} libespeak1{a}
    libexchange-storage1.2-3{a} libexempi3{a} libfont-afm-perl{a}
    libgail-gnome-module{a} libgalago3{a} libgconf2.0-cil{a} libgda2-3{a}
    libgda2-bin{a} libgda2-common{a} libgdl-1-0{a} libgdl-1-common{a}
    libgdl-gnome-1-0{a} libggz2{a} libggzcore9{a} libggzmod4{a}
    libgksu1.2-0{a} libgksuui1.0-1{a} libglade2.0-cil{a} libglib2.0-cil{a}
    libglibmm-2.4-1c2a{a} libgmime-2.0-2{a} libgmime2.2-cil{a} libgmp3c2{a}
    libgnome-desktop-2{a} libgnome-mag2{a} libgnome-media0{a}
    libgnome-pilot2{a} libgnome-speech7{a} libgnome-vfs2.0-cil{a}
    libgnome-window-settings1{a} libgnome2.0-cil{a} libgnomecupsui1.0-1c2a{a}
    libgnomekbd-common{a} libgnomekbd1{a} libgnomekbdui1{a}
    libgnomevfs2-bin{a} libgphoto2-2{a} libgphoto2-port0{a} libgtk2.0-cil{a}
    libgtkhtml3.14-19{a} libgtkmm-2.4-1c2a{a} libgtksourceview-common{a}
    libgtksourceview1.0-0{a} libgucharmap6{a} libhtml-format-perl{a}
    libhtml-parser-perl{a} libhtml-tagset-perl{a} libhtml-tree-perl{a}
    libiptcdata0{a} libmagick++10{a} libmetacity0{a}
    libmono-addins-gui0.2-cil{a} libmono-addins0.2-cil{a}
    libmono-cairo1.0-cil{a} libmono-corlib1.0-cil{a} libmono-corlib2.0-cil{a}
    libmono-data-tds1.0-cil{a} libmono-data-tds2.0-cil{a}
    libmono-i18n1.0-cil{a} libmono-i18n2.0-cil{a} libmono-security1.0-cil{a}
    libmono-security2.0-cil{a} libmono-sharpzip0.84-cil{a}
    libmono-sharpzip2.84-cil{a} libmono-system-data1.0-cil{a}
    libmono-system-data2.0-cil{a} libmono-system-web1.0-cil{a}
    libmono-system-web2.0-cil{a} libmono-system1.0-cil{a}
    libmono-system2.0-cil{a} libmono0{a} libmono1.0-cil{a} libmono2.0-cil{a}
    libndesk-dbus-glib1.0-cil{a} libndesk-dbus1.0-cil{a} libnet-dbus-perl{a}
    libnm-glib0{a} liboobs-1-3{a} libopal-2.2{a} libosp5{a} libpisync1{a}
    libplot2c2{a} libportaudio2{a} libpstoedit0c2a{a} libpt-1.10.10{a}
    libpt-1.10.10-plugins-alsa{a} libpt-1.10.10-plugins-v4l{a} librarian0{a}
    libsidplay1{a} libslab0{a} libtie-ixhash-perl{a} libtrackerclient0{a}
    libwmf-bin{a} libwww-perl{a} libxevie1{a} libxklavier11{a}
    libxml-parser-perl{a} libxml-twig-perl{a} libxml-xpath-perl{a}
    libxml2-utils{a} menu-xdg{a} metacity{a} metacity-common{a}
    mono-common{a} mono-gac{a} mono-jit{a} mono-runtime{a} nautilus{a}
    nautilus-cd-burner{a} nautilus-data{a} perlmagick{a} pkg-config{a}
    planner{a} pstoedit{a} python-beagle{a} python-brlapi{a} python-ctypes{a}
    python-elementtree{a} python-fpconst{a} python-glade2{a} python-gmenu{a}
    python-gnome2{a} python-gnome2-desktop{a} python-gnome2-extras{a}
    python-gst0.10{a} python-gtkglext1{a} python-gtksourceview2{a}
    python-libxml2{a} python-opengl{a} python-pkg-resources{a}
    python-pyatspi{a} python-pyorbit{a} python-soappy{a} python-xml{a}
    rhythmbox{a} serpentine{a} sound-juicer{a} system-tools-backends{a}
    tomboy{a} totem{a} totem-common{a} totem-gstreamer{a} totem-mozilla{a}
    totem-plugins{a} vino{a} w3c-dtd-xhtml{a} xserver-xephyr{a}
    xulrunner-gnome-support{a} yelp{a} zenity{a}

    However, installing the metapackage ‘gnome-desktop” will not add any mono libraries or mono based apps:

    alacarte at-spi{a} bittorrent{a} bluez-audio{a} bluez-gnome
    bluez-utils{a} bsh{a} bsh-gcj{a} bug-buddy{a} capplets-data{a} dasher{a}
    dasher-data{a} deskbar-applet dhcdbd{a} dmz-cursor-theme{a} ekiga{a}
    eog{a} epiphany-browser epiphany-browser-data{a} epiphany-extensions
    epiphany-gecko{a} espeak{a} espeak-data{a} evolution{a}
    evolution-common{a} evolution-data-server{a}
    evolution-data-server-common{a} evolution-exchange evolution-plugins
    evolution-webcal fam{a} fast-user-switch-applet{a} foomatic-gui
    freeglut3{a} gcalctool{a} gcj-4.2-base{a} gcj-4.3-base{a} gconf-editor{a}
    gdb{a} gdm{a} gdm-themes{a} gedit{a} gedit-common{a} ggzcore-bin{a}
    gnome-about{a} gnome-accessibility-themes{a} gnome-applets{a}
    gnome-applets-data{a} gnome-backgrounds{a} gnome-btdownload
    gnome-cards-data{a} gnome-control-center{a} gnome-core{a}
    gnome-cups-manager gnome-desktop-data{a} gnome-desktop-environment
    gnome-doc-utils{a} gnome-games{a} gnome-games-data{a}
    gnome-games-extra-data{a} gnome-keyring-manager{a} gnome-mag{a}
    gnome-media{a} gnome-media-common{a} gnome-menus{a}
    gnome-netstatus-applet{a} gnome-nettool{a} gnome-orca{a} gnome-panel{a}
    gnome-panel-data{a} gnome-pilot{a} gnome-pilot-conduits{a}
    gnome-power-manager gnome-screensaver gnome-session{a}
    gnome-system-monitor{a} gnome-system-tools{a} gnome-terminal{a}
    gnome-terminal-data{a} gnome-themes{a} gnome-user-guide{a} gnome-utils{a}
    gnome-vfs-obexftp{a} gnome-volume-manager{a} gnomebaker gnuchess{a}
    gnuchess-book{a} gok{a} gparted gstreamer0.10-ffmpeg
    gstreamer0.10-gnomevfs{a} gstreamer0.10-plugins-ugly{a}
    gstreamer0.10-tools{a} gthumb{a} gthumb-data{a} gtkhtml3.14{a}
    gucharmap{a} guile-1.8-libs{a} hardinfo icedax{a} iceweasel{a}
    iceweasel-gnome-support iproute{a} iputils-arping{a} iso-codes{a}
    libatm1{a} libatspi1.0-0{a} libbeagle1{a} libbrlapi0.5{a}
    libcairomm-1.0-1{a} libcamel1.2-10{a} libcolorblind0{a} libcpufreq0{a}
    libebook1.2-9{a} libecal1.2-7{a} libedata-book1.2-2{a}
    libedata-cal1.2-6{a} libedataserver1.2-9{a} libedataserverui1.2-8{a}
    libegroupwise1.2-13{a} libelf1{a} libespeak1{a}
    libexchange-storage1.2-3{a} libexempi3{a} libfont-afm-perl{a}
    libgail-gnome-module{a} libgalago3{a} libgcj-bc{a} libgcj-common{a}
    libgcj8-1{a} libgcj8-1-awt{a} libgcj8-jar{a} libgcj9-0{a}
    libgcj9-0-awt{a} libgcj9-jar{a} libgda2-3{a} libgda2-bin{a}
    libgda2-common{a} libgdl-1-0{a} libgdl-1-common{a} libgdl-gnome-1-0{a}
    libggz2{a} libggzcore9{a} libggzmod4{a} libgksu1.2-0{a} libgksuui1.0-1{a}
    libglibmm-2.4-1c2a{a} libgmp3c2{a} libgnome-desktop-2{a} libgnome-mag2{a}
    libgnome-media0{a} libgnome-pilot2{a} libgnome-speech7{a}
    libgnome-window-settings1{a} libgnomecupsui1.0-1c2a{a}
    libgnomekbd-common{a} libgnomekbd1{a} libgnomekbdui1{a}
    libgnomevfs2-bin{a} libgphoto2-2{a} libgphoto2-port0{a}
    libgtkhtml3.14-19{a} libgtkmm-2.4-1c2a{a} libgtksourceview-common{a}
    libgtksourceview1.0-0{a} libgucharmap6{a} libhsqldb-java{a}
    libhtml-format-perl{a} libhtml-parser-perl{a} libhtml-tagset-perl{a}
    libhtml-tree-perl{a} libhyphen0{a} libicu38{a} libieee1284-3{a}
    libiptcdata0{a} libjaxp1.3-java{a} libjaxp1.3-java-gcj{a}
    libjline-java{a} liblua5.1-0{a} libmetacity0{a} libnet-dbus-perl{a}
    libnl1{a} libnm-glib0{a} libnm-util0{a} liboobs-1-3{a} libopal-2.2{a}
    libopenobex1{a} libosp5{a} libparted1.7-1{a} libpisync1{a}
    libportaudio2{a} libprinterconf0c2a{a} libprintsys{a} libpt-1.10.10{a}
    libpt-1.10.10-plugins-alsa{a} libpt-1.10.10-plugins-v4l{a} librarian0{a}
    libsane{a} libsane-extras{a} libservlet2.4-java{a} libsidplay1{a}
    libslab0{a} libsnmpkit2c2a{a} libstlport4.6c2{a} libtdb1{a}
    libtie-ixhash-perl{a} libtrackerclient0{a} libwww-perl{a}
    libxalan2-java{a} libxalan2-java-gcj{a} libxerces2-java{a}
    libxerces2-java-gcj{a} libxevie1{a} libxklavier11{a}
    libxml-parser-perl{a} libxml-twig-perl{a} libxml-xpath-perl{a}
    libxml2-utils{a} liferea lsb-release{a} menu-xdg metacity{a}
    metacity-common{a} nautilus{a} nautilus-cd-burner{a} nautilus-data{a}
    network-manager{a} network-manager-gnome network-manager-openvpn{a}
    network-manager-openvpn-gnome{a} openoffice.org-base{a}
    openoffice.org-base-core{a} openoffice.org-common{a}
    openoffice.org-core{a} openoffice.org-evolution openoffice.org-gnome
    openoffice.org-gtk{a} openoffice.org-java-common{a}
    openoffice.org-style-andromeda{a} openoffice.org-style-crystal{a}
    openoffice.org-style-hicontrast{a} openoffice.org-style-industrial{a}
    openoffice.org-style-tango{a} openvpn{a} pconf-detect{a} pkg-config{a}
    python-apt{a} python-beagle{a} python-brlapi{a} python-ctypes{a}
    python-elementtree{a} python-foomatic{a} python-fpconst{a}
    python-glade2{a} python-gmenu{a} python-gnome2{a}
    python-gnome2-desktop{a} python-gnome2-extras{a} python-gnupginterface{a}
    python-gtkglext1{a} python-gtksourceview2{a} python-ipy{a}
    python-libxml2{a} python-notify{a} python-opengl{a}
    python-pkg-resources{a} python-pyatspi{a} python-pyorbit{a}
    python-soappy{a} rdesktop{a} rhythmbox sane-utils{a} sound-juicer{a}
    system-tools-backends{a} totem{a} totem-common{a} totem-gstreamer{a}
    totem-mozilla totem-plugins{a} tsclient ttf-opensymbol{a}
    update-manager{a} update-notifier vino{a} w3c-dtd-xhtml{a} xsane
    xsane-common{a} xserver-xephyr{a} xulrunner-gnome-support{a} yelp{a}
    zenity{a}

  17. machiner said,

    March 25, 2008 at 11:52 am

    Gravatar

    The meta-package gnome-desktop does not include mono infection. However, the direction that Debian’s upcoming release is heading in worries me.

  18. Christopher Browne said,

    March 25, 2008 at 4:35 pm

    Gravatar

    Chris Cox (long time no see, man!) stated a combination of clear facts along with some opinions. I don’t see any indications that any of his facts are wrong.

    The class libraries are, as he indicated, available under an MIT style license, and with that shift, it seems entirely plausible for the runtime portion to be, at some point, similarly relicensed.

    It is also clearly *TRUE* that MonoDevelop has been ported to run on Windows (http://www.monodevelop.com/MonoDevelopWin32), which, in that this project attracted interest, demonstrates clearly that there are people on Windows interested in running Mono-related code there.

    Chris commented that Mono libraries might be used to supplement things missing on WinCE. Contrary to the blind dismissal, that’s also true.

    It also looks like the tool Chris alluded to (validating that apps will work on Mono) exists…

    So far, I’m not seeing any place where Chris Cox has said anything that is a “matter of fact” that is in any way false.

    There are plenty of assertions, beyond that, that are MATTERS OF OPINION where it is quite evident that you guys are so blinded by your belief in the axiomatic truth of your own opinions that you are unable to make anything resembling an objective evaluation of the matter.

  19. Victor Soliz said,

    March 25, 2008 at 10:30 pm

    Gravatar

    I don’t see any indications that any of his facts are wrong

    The GPL FUD remains in his post, with the assumption that windows developers didn’t want to use MONO because it was GPLed (Which doesn’t make any sense since the libraries already use one of those non-GPL licenses anyways.


    Even assuming that his opinions are facts like you said so, it is not worth it. I still insist pleasing a couple of windows developers is not worth the total lost of identity MONO implies for Linux, not even mentioning the risks.

    There is a reason Novell pushes MONO so hard and it is that at the end of the day, it will give SLED a competitive advantage since they are the only ones with MS protection. Since you like to talk about facts so much, this IS a fact, just check the moonlight debacle out for confirmation.

  20. Victor Soliz said,

    March 25, 2008 at 10:31 pm

    Gravatar

    So, let’s assume a couple of windows developers decided to use MONO, this will not in any way represent we will have more Linux developers, MONO is a whole different platform and any application they make is going to be non-native and thus Linux wins nothing.

  21. Roy Schestowitz said,

    March 25, 2008 at 10:37 pm

    Gravatar

    Mono is Novell, Novell is Mono. To many, Linux is Ubuntu (desktop), Linux is Red Hat (server). If Novell can push its little Mono revolution ‘upstream’, then it can change the rules and make a Novell ‘the’ Linux (Windows-like environment with patent covenants).

    Novell changes the identity of Linux to serve Novell and Microsoft. It has nothing whatsoever to do with the “Free Desktop” GNU wants to bring and nothing to do with the GPL, which resists software patents.

  22. infodroid said,

    March 26, 2008 at 2:20 am

    Gravatar

    Nobody here has commented from a developer’s perspective.

    I need a modern, high-level language to do development on GNOME. C++ is way to cumbersome given the power of C# and mono.

    While I would prefer to use java-gnome bindings, they are broken and poorly supported. They have been that way as long as I can remember.

    That leaves mono-gnome as the best alternative. Until java-gnome get their act together, many more developers will choose to write in mono. Not necessarily for ideological reasons, but just because its the better platform right now.

  23. Linux_Is_Fun said,

    March 26, 2008 at 3:28 am

    Gravatar

    I need a modern, high-level language to do development on GNOME. C++ is way to cumbersome given the power of C# and mono.

    You can always use Python which is very well supported in Gnome/GTK.

  24. Roy Schestowitz said,

    March 26, 2008 at 3:40 am

    Gravatar

    I was pretty happy with C++ and Qt. On the GTK side, GTK 2 and C treated me well at the time. I keep seeing this pattern where the defense from ‘Mono apologists’ touches on technical merits while escaping all the issues that actually matter in this particular discussion. I’m not the only one to have noticed this.

  25. akf said,

    March 26, 2008 at 7:51 am

    Gravatar

    infodroid said,

    I need a modern, high-level language to do development on GNOME. C++ is way to cumbersome given the power of C# and mono.

    Have a look at Vala.

  26. Victor Soliz said,

    March 26, 2008 at 8:26 am

    Gravatar

    C++ is way to cumbersome given the power of C# and mono.

    That’s fun, cause the way I see interpreted and VM languages I see an intentional attempt to give us less power than what C++ does. Anyway, try out vala like the akf guy said.

    Python also works, I’ve seen many good gnome apps and later I was shocked to find python was behind them, a better solution would be to have an alternative to C#, but someone needs to come up to it, something taking the good parts of C#’s syntax, (and forgetting the bad ones) and make it able to compile naively, I think vala is promising on this subject, but some people have an irrational attachment towards garbage collectors, and Vala is only meant for gnome applications…

    It would be ideal if Java fixed its GTK bindings, and went 100% FLOSS, until that, it is not a much better alternative than MONO.

    I think that the C/++/python combo is a proven technique, although I personally don’t like python that much.

  27. Christopher Browne said,

    March 26, 2008 at 12:05 pm

    Gravatar

    Victor Soliz said:

    ——————————————————————————
    The GPL FUD remains in his post, with the assumption that windows developers didn’t want to use MONO because it was GPLed (Which doesn’t make any sense since the libraries already use one of those non-GPL licenses anyways.
    ——————————————————————————

    Well, from what I can tell, Chris Cox and I have each contributed WAY more code under both the GPL and other licenses than you have, so OUR opinions have affected software that is *actually included* in Linux and BSD distributions.

    The hysterical rantings of people who merely write about things that they *wish* they had a useful opinion on matter a whole lot less than contributions of Actual Working Code.

  28. infodroid said,

    March 26, 2008 at 3:26 pm

    Gravatar

    @Linux_Is_Fun:

    Yes, Python is great for some things. But when I need to write robust and strongly-typed code, I have found that it is the wrong language for the job. I get better results with Java.

    @akf:

    Yes, Vala is a welcome development. But it does not help the fact I am stuck writing low-level C code to do the real work instead of focusing on abstractions.

    @Victor Soliz:

    I agree in some ways VM languages are technically less “powerful”, if you mean “power” in the sense of allowing you to do whatever you want.

    However, I think many programmers think of “power” in the sense of achieving a lot of results with the minimum effort.

    In this way C#, Java, and to a great extent Python are very liberating for desktop application developers because they allow developers to go a long way without wasting time on boilerplate code.

  29. CoolGuy said,

    March 27, 2008 at 6:53 am

    Gravatar

    @infodroid

    you can always opt for QT if you are into the super-power kind of programmer.

    Gnome is more about freedom. It is lacking in some areas considering its a free project and people dont get paid to do any work on it. Same is with gnash, etc.

    Not the latest and greatest – but gets the job done. We are happy with that – as long its a FSF project.

    Those who find Gnome/GTK lacking can always use KDE/QT rather than going for Mono or any other m$ sponsored illegal crapware.net

  30. Roy Schestowitz said,

    March 27, 2008 at 7:10 am

    Gravatar

    CoolGuy,

    Qt is pretty much as open as GTK. This out-of-date FUD (not blaming you by any means) often angers KDE developers who suffer from this stereotype.

  31. CoolGuy said,

    March 27, 2008 at 7:19 am

    Gravatar

    Sorry I never meant to spread FUD but I was trying to explain that there are a other options available if someone finds GTK not that “super power can do everything”.

    There is no need for MONO even on a technical merits.

  32. akf said,

    March 27, 2008 at 7:40 am

    Gravatar

    infodroid said,

    Yes, Vala is a welcome development. But it does not help the fact I am stuck writing low-level C code to do the real work instead of focusing on abstractions.

    Vala aims to be a feature-complete language. It just uses C as intermediate language, Just like C compilers use Assembler as intermediate language. This also doesn’t mean, that you are stuck writing low level Assembler programs, when you write in C. Vala is an abstraction layer above C like C is an abstraction layer above Assembler.

  33. Roy Schestowitz said,

    March 27, 2008 at 7:48 am

    Gravatar

    CoolGuy, what I put there in brackets was intended to ensure you don’t see this as an accusation, just a gentle clarification because I know how angry Aaron Seigo got when Glyn Moody made a subtle incorrect insinuation. :-) :-)

    GNOME is not ‘more free’ than KDE. It hasn’t been the case for many years, so it’s really juts a dead horse to kick (the argument, that is).

  34. Miles said,

    March 27, 2008 at 12:13 pm

    Gravatar

    Vala is just as potential (and likely more so) a patent minefield as Mono because Vala clones the C# syntax, and, worse yet, because it isn’t true C#, the agreement (as part of being an ECMA spec) not to sue does not apply to it.

    If you advocate staying away from Mono because of fear of infringing on patents, then I highly suggest you stay away from Vala as well.

  35. enki said,

    March 28, 2008 at 2:54 am

    Gravatar

    Yeah…monogamy is really bad thing. But why you refer to this problem as “Mono”? Am I infected by using my favourite apps like f-spot, beagle etc?
    Ok, to the case. From my user standpoint its just one thing which really sucks. Java. All java programs runs slow as hell and have usability of troglodyts. I suppose that Mono based OOO will run much better.
    And…there is moonlight project which will take web back from real evil – flash. Blame me, I am using linux just because its more stable operating system with near all features I need. I don’t have proprietary nvidia driver, I understand what evil is in this deal. But, wake up..MS is not an enemy, it’s just player on same minefield.

  36. akf said,

    March 28, 2008 at 3:35 am

    Gravatar

    Miles said,

    Vala is just as potential (and likely more so) a patent minefield as Mono because Vala clones the C# syntax

    First of all, the syntax of C# is not so very different compared to other languages. So there should be more than enough prior art.

    And even in the unlikely event, that tis becomes a problem: Vala produces C code as intermediate language. So it should be relatively easy to switch a project back to pure C.

  37. Roy Schestowitz said,

    March 28, 2008 at 3:40 am

    Gravatar

    Similarity to C# is not a problem because C# is similar to Java, which is in turn similar to many other things (remember the Microsoft/Sun deal which revolved around Java?). It’s complete copying of something (backward-engineering) that becomes an issue.

  38. Novice said,

    March 28, 2008 at 3:55 am

    Gravatar

    I have been searching for a good free C++ cross-platform IDE with visual GUI builder for quiet an year or more.I should say that I have not been lucky enough. While the Eclipses and Netbeans offer the core development capabilities like debugging, syntax highlighting etc., I really wanted an application where I do the UI programming without much manual intervention, in the drag-an-drop mode.

    The repeated searches on the web kept pointing to me to Anjuta (which uses Glade), Code::blocks and Mono finally. Out of these three, I am inclined towards the C::B and Mono.

    Frankly, IMO,Linux community does not have a strong developer productivity tool for C++, which enables
    a) Visual GUI builder
    b) Cross platform development (at least Linux and Windows)
    c) Free

    I think this is where Mono scored offering all this three in a single platform.

    OTOH, I also understand the implications of going with a product which has it internals tightly integrated with M$ products or proprietary technologies.

    I am not decided on which one to choose yet….

  39. Roy Schestowitz said,

    March 28, 2008 at 4:02 am

    Gravatar

    Frankly, IMO,Linux community does not have a strong developer productivity tool for C++, which enables
    a) Visual GUI builder
    b) Cross platform development (at least Linux and Windows)
    c) Free

    Try Qt.

  40. Tazman said,

    March 28, 2008 at 1:10 pm

    Gravatar

    Let’s be serious Mono is no problem for the community.
    We can always find a replacement so what is with this buzz?

  41. Victor Soliz said,

    March 28, 2008 at 3:11 pm

    Gravatar

    Why do you mean by we can always find a replacement? People are distributing mono apps are .exe that are totally tied to Mono, replacing it will mean removing all those apps, and Novell’s plan is clearly to exploit money so these apps remain better featured.

  42. Roy Schestowitz said,

    March 28, 2008 at 8:09 pm

    Gravatar

    There is an application dependency that is a practical one. People have their data tied to Mono apps, not to mention skills and habits.

  43. Tazman said,

    March 29, 2008 at 5:33 am

    Gravatar

    Firt i dont think Novell is evil and this is my opinion second there are other mono alternatives if you didnt know

  44. Roy Schestowitz said,

    March 29, 2008 at 8:15 am

    Gravatar

    Novell is not “evil”, but its approach towards marketing and developing GNU/Linux is more of a favour to a company that has been trying to extinguish Linux for over a decade. Novell can still try to correct what it has done, so this is not a rant but more of an instructive and gentle suggestion arguing that focus should be taken off Microsoft .NET.

  45. cojii said,

    April 24, 2008 at 12:00 pm

    Gravatar

    @roy:

    http://trolltech.com/downloads

    vs

    http://www.gtk.org/

    I do NOT Like their surface approval of c# rather than java so I wont be useing GTK anymore, but its clear from that page that LGPL ( propreitary apps can use it for free and without royalties thus making it ‘more free’ than qt ) is the preferred route as whether you like it or not, it allows the most freedom.

    cya
    cojii

  46. Roy Schestowitz said,

    April 24, 2008 at 5:04 pm

    Gravatar

    I’ve used GTK and loved it (also Qt). I believe the problem is related to the equivalent of poor hiring that enables people to change the agenda of a company (or project). In private, someone has just told that OpenBSD might be having a similar issue at this very moment.

  47. mass-carpone said,

    April 25, 2008 at 4:29 pm

    Gravatar

    Lots of fuzz about nothing; don’t wet’em, aunt Tilly.

  48. Victor Soliz said,

    May 7, 2008 at 8:01 pm

    Gravatar

    Vala is just as potential (and likely more so) a patent minefield as Mono because Vala clones the C# syntax, and, worse yet, because it isn’t true C#, the agreement (as part of being an ECMA spec) not to sue does not apply to it.

    Such an irrational condition, yet so many people like MS’ pledge not to sue so much…

    I encourage more people to use C# so unique features in new languages away from .net giberish, I had in the past for a language that is compiled to some other game engine language. Anyways I have just installed (and I am using) my first vala app, “dynamicworkspaces” , very useful.

  49. Victor Soliz said,

    May 26, 2008 at 5:53 pm

    Gravatar

    Roy, I think Lucy is an advert bot, check ‘her homepage’

  50. Roy Schestowitz said,

    May 26, 2008 at 8:06 pm

    Gravatar

    Yes, you’re right. And there I was thinking it wasn’t a just a discussion among males.

    Spam removed.

  51. Levi Campbell said,

    June 7, 2008 at 5:36 pm

    Gravatar

    Oh man, where do I start here?

    Roy, I think your post here is a little too one-sided, I think that if we’re going to be talking about mono, it’s important that both sides of the story are heard.

    1. The Port 25 blog has an interview with Miguel de Icaza that was posted in 2006:
    http://port25.technet.com/archive/2006/08/11/Let_2700_s-talk-Mono_3A00_–Sam-interviews-Miguel-de-Icaza.aspx

    2. The patent system in the US is messed up (and currently being discussed by congress.), so even if MS did sue someone over mono, they would have a hard time proving financial damage because they give away mono.
    http://yro.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=08/02/05/2157209
    http://yro.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=08/04/09/1856252

    3. Microsoft is starting to give away the source code for the .net framework.
    http://weblogs.asp.net/scottgu/archive/2008/01/16/net-framework-library-source-code-now-available.aspx
    http://weblogs.asp.net/scottgu/archive/2007/10/03/releasing-the-source-code-for-the-net-framework-libraries.aspx

    In closing, I hope I’ve given people some food for thought about how they see the mono project an it’s relationship with Linux and open-source software as a whole.

    Thank You.

  52. vincent said,

    August 11, 2008 at 10:16 am

    Gravatar

    The best thing would be to merge and Mono. Net and then put Mono under LGPL v3.

What Else is New


  1. Links 18/10/2018: New Ubuntu and Postgres

    Links for the day



  2. It's Almost 2019 and Team UPC is Still Pretending Unitary Patent (UPC) Exists, Merely Waiting for Britain to Join

    Refusing to accept that the Unified Patent Court Agreement (UPCA) has reached its death or is at a dead end, UPC proponents — i.e. lawyers looking to profit from frivolous litigation — resort to outright lies and gymnastics in logic/intellectual gymnastics



  3. IAM and IP Kat Are Still Megaphones of Battistelli and His Agenda

    IAM reaffirms its commitment to corrupt Battistelli and IP Kat maintains its stance, which is basically not caring at all about EPO corruption (to the point of actively deleting blog comments that mention such corruption, i.e. 'sanitising' facts)



  4. The EPO Under António Campinos Relaxes the Rules on Software Patenting and the Litigation 'Industry' Loves That

    EPO management, which is nontechnical, found new terms by which to refer to software patents -- terms that even the marketing departments can endorse (having propped them up); they just call it all AI, augmented intelligence and so on



  5. Links 17/10/2018: Elementary OS 5.0 “Juno” Released, MongoDB’s Server Side Public Licence

    Links for the day



  6. Improving US Patent Quality Through Reassessments of Patents and Courts' Transparency

    Transparency in US courts and more public participation in the patent process (examination, litigation etc.) would help demonstrate that many patents are being granted — and sometimes asserted — that are totally bunk, bogus, fake



  7. Ask OIN How It Intends to Deal With Microsoft Proxies Such as Patent Trolls

    OIN continues to miss the key point (or intentionally avoid speaking about it); Microsoft is still selling 'protection' from the very same patent trolls that it is funding, arming, and sometimes even instructing (who to pass patents to and sue)



  8. Links 1610/2018: Linux 4.19 RC8, Xfce Screensaver 0.1.0 Released

    Links for the day



  9. Judge-Bashing Tactics, Undermining PTAB, and Iancu's Warpath for the Litigation and Insurance 'Industries'

    Many inter partes reviews (IPRs) at the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) leverage 35 U.S.C. § 101 against software patents; instead of putting an end to such patents Director Iancu decides to just serve the 'industry' he came from (a meta-industry where his firm had worked for Donald Trump)



  10. 'Cloud', 'AI' and Other Buzzwords as Excuses for Granting Fake Patents on Software

    With resurgence of rather meaningless terms like so-called 'clouds' (servers/hosting) and 'AI' (typically anything in code which does something clever, including management of patents) the debate is being shifted away from 35 U.S.C. § 101 (Section 101); but courts would still see past such façade



  11. Corporate Media's Failure to Cover Patents Properly and Our New Hosting Woes

    A status update about EPO affairs and our Web host's plan to shut down (as a whole) very soon, leaving us orphaned or having to pay heavy bills



  12. Links 15/10/2018: Testing Ubuntu 18.10 Release Candidates, KaOS 2018.10 Released

    Links for the day



  13. USPTO FEES Act/SUCCESS Act Gives More Powers to Director Iancu, Supplying Patents for Litigation 'Business' and Embargo (ITC)

    Corruption of the US patent system contributes to various issues which rely on the extrajudicial nature of some elements in this system; companies can literally have their products confiscated or imports blocked, based on wrongly-granted patents



  14. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit Decides That USPTO Wrongly Granted Patents to Roche

    Patent quality issues at the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) — motivated by money rather than common sense — continue to be highlighted by courts; the USPTO needs to raise the bar to improve the legal certainty associated with US patents



  15. Even Judge Gilstrap From Texas is Starting to Accept That Software Patents Are Invalid

    Amid new lawsuits from Texas (e.g. against Citrix) we’re pleased to see that even “reprehensible” Rodney Gilstrap (that’s what US politicians call him) is learning to accept SCOTUS on 35 U.S.C. § 101



  16. Federal Circuit Doubles Down on User Interface Patents, Helps Microsoft-Connected Patent Trolls Curtail the Prime Competitor of Microsoft Office

    Patent trolls that are connected to Microsoft continue to sue Microsoft rivals using old patents; this time, for a change, even the Federal Circuit lets them get away with it



  17. Let's Hope Apple Defeats All the Abstract Patents That Are Leveraged Against It

    Apple can be viewed as a strategic 'ally' against patents that threaten Android/Linux if one ignores all the patent battles the company started (and has since then settled) against Android OEMs



  18. EPO Insider/Märpel Says President Campinos Already Acts Like Battistelli

    Unitary Patent (UPC) is a step towards making the EPO an EU institution like the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO); but it's not making any progress and constitutional judges must realise that Campinos, chosen by Battistelli to succeed him, is just an empty mask



  19. Quality of Patents Granted by the EPO is Still Low and Nobody Will Benefit Except Lawyers, Jubilant Over Growing Lenience on Software Patents

    Deterioration of patent quality at the EPO — a serious problem which examiners themselves are complaining about — is becoming rather evident as new guidelines are very lenient on software patenting



  20. 100 Days Into the Term of Campinos There is Already an EPO Suicide

    A seventh known suicide at the EPO since the so-called 'reforms' began; the EPO continues to pretend that everything is changing for the better, but in reality it's yet more nepotism and despotism



  21. Links 13/10/2018: Ubuntu Touch OTA-5, MidnightBSD 1.0 Ready

    Links for the day



  22. Links 11/10/2018: PostgreSQL 11 RC1 Released, Librem 5 Loves GNOME 3.32

    Links for the day



  23. Friend Brings a Friend, Boss Becomes Subordinate: the EPO Under António Campinos is Starting to Look a Lot Like Team Battistelli 2.0

    The new President of the EPO contributes to the perception that the Office is a rogue institution. Governance is all in reverse at the Office because it still seems like the Office President bosses the Council rather than be bossed by it (as intended, as per the EPC)



  24. UPC Cowardice: Team UPC Uses Cloaks of Anonymity to Discredit Authors of Scholarly UPC Paper They Don't Like

    Team UPC has sunk to the bottom of the barrel; now it uses anonymous letters in an effort to discredit work of Max Planck Institute staff, in the same way (more or less) that ad hominem attacks were attempted against the filer of the constitutional complaint in Germany



  25. New EPO Guidelines: Granting European Patents on Business Methods, Algorithms, Mental Acts and Other Abstract Stuff

    Keeping so-called 'production' high and meeting so-called 'targets' (allegedly set by Battistelli), Campinos relaxes the rules for "computer-implemented inventions" (one among many misleading terms that mean software patents in Europe)



  26. Open Invention Network is a Proponent of Software Patents -- Just Like Microsoft -- and Microsoft Keeps Patents It Uses to Blackmail Linux Vendors

    OIN loves Microsoft; OIN loves software patents as well. So Microsoft's membership in OIN is hardly a surprise and it's not solving the main issue either, as Microsoft can indirectly sue and "Microsoft has not included any patents they might hold on exfat into the patent non-aggression pact," according to Bradley M. Kuhn



  27. Links 10/10/2018: Unreal Engine 4.21 Preview, Red Hat Openshift Container Platform 3.11

    Links for the day



  28. Links 9/10/2018: Plasma 5.14, Flatpak 1.2 Plan

    Links for the day



  29. Greg Reilly Inadvertently Makes a Case for Replacing/Improving the Patent System With a Wiki, Editable by All as Society Moves Forward

    Editable patents make a lot more sense in the age of the Internet and the World Wide Web; companies that rode the wave of the Net are themselves changing their patents on the go, sometimes because they simply attempt to dodge an evolving patenting criterion which nowadays looks down on software patents



  30. The USPTO's Principal Issue is Abstract Patents (or Patent Scope), Not Prior Art Searches

    In spite of the fact that US courts prolifically reject patents for being abstract (citing 35 U.S.C. § 101) Cisco, Google, MIT, and the USPTO go chasing better search facilities, addressing the lesser if not the wrong problem


CoPilotCo

RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

CoPilotCo

Recent Posts