05.22.08
Posted in News Roundup at 11:48 am by Roy Schestowitz

GNU/Linux
- Famelix and the dangers of combating Windows
As with any GNU/Linux distribution, exact figures for use are hard to come by for Famelix. However, other users of the distribution include 62 military units, and schools and digital inclusion centers throughout South America. On its home site, the distribution has had more than 22 million downloads — at least 14 million of them in the last 12 months, thanks mainly to the first releases to support German, English, and Italian in addition to the original Spanish and Portugese. By any standard, the distribution seems a success.
- Home media system runs open source Linux
A company called Fiire is shipping a home automation, media control, and security system based on the open source LinuxMCE distro. Built around a dual-core AMD Athlon X2-based box called the Fiire Engine, the Fiire system also includes FiireStation thin clients and a Z-Wave-based FiireChief controller.
- Buntu Family Theater [video]
- PCLinuxOS
- Comparing Linux USB flash disk distros
- CeBIT - Red Hat champions open source market education
- New Enhancements for Red Hat Enterprise Linux
F/OSS
GPUs
Leftovers
VN:F [1.1.7_509]
Rating: 0.0/10 (0 votes cast)
Share and Enjoy:
These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
Permalink
Send this to a friend
If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channel. To use your own IRC client, join channel #boycottnovell in FreeNode.
Pages that cross-reference this one
Listed from October 23rd 2007 onwards, pingbacks and trackbacks (external) are omitted
What Else is New
IRC: #boycottnovell @ FreeNode: July 1st, 2009
IRC Log for July 1st, 2009
Report: Microsoft's Patent Racketeering Comes from Myhrvold
Microsoft extorts $120 Million out of rival Intuit, using the patent troll it is grooming
Poll: 62% Don't Trust Microsoft on Mono
A lot of news about Mono with special emphasis on key developments
Proprietary Software Falters
Microsoft demonstrates that non-Free software is simply incapable of handling mission-critical tasks like GNU/Linux does (in Wall Street for example)
Web Browser Links
Mostly links about IE8
Confirmed: Windows Vista Still Rejected by Customers
Beyond the hype there is a rather colossal failure that the press actually reports on
Links 01/07/2009: New Sabayon, New IBM Compiler, Virtualbox 3.0
Links for the day
Government of Portugal Ignores Procurement Rules and Gives Taxpayers' Money to Microsoft
Another classic case of illegitimate use of money without public tender
MSCOSCONF 'Winner' is a Marketing Guy, Attacks FOSS
Microsoft is giving awards to marketing people who help its fight against GNU/Linux (and Free software in general)
Rob Weir Complains About Microsoft's Manipulation of Wikipedia
Microsoft carries on smearing ODF in public while pretending to support it
Who Promotes Mono? Microsoft and Novell
New signs lead back to Microsoft (not just Novell)
Microsoft Kills Channel 8 and Channel 10
Axing embellished as "folding", more on "perception management"
Microsoft-dominated DHS Concerned About Windows Zombies (Corrected)
Janet Napolitano from Microsoft speaks on behalf of the DHS about the effect of Windows zombies
IRC: #boycottnovell @ FreeNode: June 30th, 2009
IRC Log for June 30th, 2009
More People Say “No” to Mono, Including the Software Freedom Law Center (SFLC)
More opposition to Mono surfaces, detailed explanations offered
Another Microsoft Vice President Jumps Ship, Employee Benefits Take a Dive
At this pace of abandonment, who will be left to lead?
Another Microsoft Product Dies: MSN Web Messenger
Microsoft hangs the Messenger
Microsoft Exploits Death to Advertise Its Products
Microsoft uses Michael Jackson's tragic death to advertise itself
Links 30/06/2009: KDE 4.3 Video, SourceForge Hits 4 Billion Downloads
Links for the day
In Praise of Mozilla Firefox 3.5
Computer Shops Participate in Vista 7 “Scam”
Microsoft claims a "discount" which is not
Microsoft's Dublin DC Could be Indicative of the Notorious Tax Evasion Conspiracy
Ireland receives another favour for offering a tax haven to Microsoft?
Microsoft's Latest Benchmark Fraud
Microsoft's advertising is still a scam and should be dealt with appropriately
Microsoft to Cut Another 2,000+ Jobs
Microsoft carries on shrinking while it's borrowing money
IRC: #boycottnovell @ FreeNode: June 29th, 2009
IRC Log for June 29th, 2009
New Examples of Questionable Press Coverage
Assorted brow-raising items in the news
Mono Proponents Do Not Address the Real Questions
Supporters of Mono answer questions that are not even asked -- a pattern which requires simple clarification
Microsoft's ODF Lunch Paid Off
ODF news which is more or less organised and some other picks from the news
Links 29/06/2009: Core Linux 2.1 Released; FreeDOS is Now 15
Links for the day
GNOME's Evolution Proceeds as Planned?
The prophecy of Novell's Miguel de Icaza is becoming true
LinuxIsFun said,
May 23, 2008 at 2:05 am
http://www.digistan.org
The founders of the Digital Standards Organization, and others, will sign the Hague Declaration on 21 May 2008 in the Hague. The signing ceremony will be held in the Dutch Royal Library.
Any updates on this….???????????????
Roy Schestowitz said,
May 23, 2008 at 2:10 am
Nothing that I’ve come across in the past couple of days. However, some interesting articles crop up about the EU’s reaction to Microsoft’s policy (they don’t say “embrace”) on ODF.
There have also been some interesting E-mails on the ODF Discussion List, such as this one from half an hours ago:
On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 7:37 PM, marbux wrote:
> The more interesting part to me was Phipps’ closing:
> “Of course, I might also reflect on the fact they are finally doing
> exactly what Stephe Walli said they ought to do to kill ODF.
This is potentially so huge I can’t even get my mind around it. Why would Microsoft do this? What is in it for them? How will they seek to turn it to their advantage?
Some suggestions as to why:
1) because they are being investigated by the EU for their coercion in getting OOXML passed.
2) because they want to extend, embrace, and extinguish:
http://stephesblog.blogs.com/my_weblog/2005/12/how_microsoft_s.html
3) because they recognize that they have lost some important ground the format wars, and that governments really do resent being forced to use MOOXML the way that Microsoft forced it on them with proposed ISO 29500.
4) because they succeeded in using dirty procedural tricks to get MOOX approved as an ISO standard, and now they see that they need to get Microsoft reps on standards bodies if they are going to control and ultimately subvert those standards bodies as they did with ISO.
IMHO, we really need to all bookmark Stephen Walli’s blog below, and read it frequently, and maybe even read it aloud to one one another occasionally at meetings, because we are not out of the dark as long as Microsoft has billions to burn to defend its monopoly. I have often heard it said that the rational monopoly will, at some point, be willing to spend the provable future value of the company minus one dollar defending its monopoly status. They owe it to their shareholders to be as vicious as we all know that they have been for decades now.
> If one reads the linked piece from 2005 by former Microsoft exec,
> Stephen Walli, >
Let’s all remember what Microsoft did in staking the ISO vote; and how it packed rooms to block out Sun and IBM participation in Spain. We have one an important procedural step, but the competition for open document standards is only just now beginning. Please remember, too, what a Microsoft Exec once said about stacking panels:
http://boycottnovell.com/2008/01/30/evangelism-is-war-memo/
Thanks to Roy Schestowitz for uncovering and posting that revealing “Evangelism is war” presentation by James Plamondon, Technical Evangelist, Microsoft Developer Relations Group, which is linked above.
Expect more procedural tricks from Microsoft. Exercise caution in watching meeting agendas and lists of participants. Here is a cut-and-paste from Roy Schestowitz’s posting of Microsoft Evangelist James Plamondon’s screed on how to stack panels:
**********
I have mentioned before the “stacked panel.” Panel discussions naturally favor alliances of relatively weak partners — our usual opposition. For example, an “unbiased” panel on OLE vs. OpenDoc would contain representatives of the backers of OLE (Microsoft) and the Backers of OpenDoc (Apple, IBM, Novell, WordPerfect, OMG, etc.). Thus, we find ourselves outnumbered in almost every “naturally occurring” panel debate.
A stacked panel, on the other hand, is like a stacked deck: it is packed with people who, on the face of things, should be neutral, but who are in fact strong supporters of our technology. The key to stacking a panel is being able to choose the moderator. Most conference organizers allow the moderator to select die panel, so if you can pick the moderator, you win. Since you can’t expect representatives of our competitors to speak on your behalf, you have to get the moderator to agree to having only “independent ISVs” on the panel. No one from Microsoft or any other formal backer of the competing technologies would be allowed -just ISVs who have to use this stuff in the “real world.” Sounds marvellously independent doesn’t it? In feet, it allows us to stack the panel with ISVs that back our cause. Thus, the “independent” panel ends up telling the audience that our technology beats the others hands down. Get the press to cover this panel, and you’ve got a major win on your hands.
Finding a moderator is key to setting up a stacked panel
************************