07.01.08
ISO Sweeps Abuses Under the Rug While Microsoft Extends Anti-GPL Scope
A few days ago we shared the very brief take from Bob Sutor on that now-infamous Reuters article. It was about denial. Joining the critics now is Tim Bray who wrote:
Especially when ISO’s head honcho Alan Bryden goes on the record to say (quoting from Reuters) that “criticisms that a fast-track process was abused to rush through the Microsoft standard were unfounded” (note Reuters doesn’t use quotation marks, so presumably they’re summarizing Bryden).
Um, excuse me, doesn’t it seem wildly inappropriate for the chief executive of an allegedly-neutral international agency to comment dismissively on an in-progress appeal? If I were on ISO’s Board of Directors or equivalent, I’d be hauling Mr. Bryden in right now for a short unpleasant interview.
Whatever; the damage is done. I really hope my personal impression, based on the OOXML experience, that ISO alternates between bumbling and whorishness, is wrong. The world needs a reasonably competent and transparent standards organization whose integrity is not a standing joke.
To summarise, it’s “business as usual” at ISO, which prefers to ignore some of its own people who confessed that the process had been abused. Microsoft is the same: “Business as usual” after the abuses of the process, the vicious attacks on ODF, and even against people.
Microsoft proceeds as if nothing has happened.
Microsoft on Monday unveiled projects to improve data portability between Office 2007 and other document file formats as part of an interoperability promise
The company also appears to be extending the RAND+OSP folly to other areas where the GPL gets excluded. Watch this bit from its accompanying press release which preceded the announcement.
This documentation is available to anyone on a royalty-free basis under Microsoft’s Open Specification Promise (OSP).
Expect more of the same scheme. “OSP” means “we don’t play with GPL.”
To summarise: Microsoft messed about with ISO, then saw it denying the abuses, and now it proceeds to locking out Free software using pseudo ’standards’. Some things never change, such is as the attitude of Microsoft towards its greatest competitors. █
“Microsoft corrupted many members of ISO in order to win approval for its phony ‘open’ document format, OOXML. This was so governments that keep their documents in a Microsoft-only format can pretend that they are using ‘open standards.’ The government of South Africa has filed an appeal against the decision, citing the irregularities in the process.”
–Richard Stallman, June 2008
Jo Shields said,
December 12, 2008 at 3:31 am
Hm, seems spambots are getting past your captcha, Roy. Do you have Akismet installed?
Roy Schestowitz said,
December 12, 2008 at 4:55 am
Yes, spam deleted (was: “This is a nice post about variety of rugs and its a very needed information. Thanks for such an important post.”)
nancy walters said,
December 16, 2008 at 12:55 am
Thanks for such an important articles about rugs. This is a very needed info about rugs,
Thanks
jo Shields said,
December 16, 2008 at 2:30 am
Perhaps you SHOULD start selling rugs? Seems the spambots have faith in you
Roy Schestowitz said,
December 16, 2008 at 3:45 am
Heh. I saw this rug thing in other blogs too.
anna michel said,
December 17, 2008 at 12:18 am
It a nice site collecting all info about rugs.
I use to buy these rugs and i need this information.
Thanks for your time to post this article.
Kelly said,
December 17, 2008 at 3:05 am
Its a nice post about online rugs buying because Online buying is fast becoming the most preferred mode of shopping whereby shoppers can reap the advantages of Internet shopping from the luxury of their homes.
Jo Shields said,
December 17, 2008 at 3:29 am
I wonder if boycottrugs.com is taken
Roy Schestowitz said,
December 17, 2008 at 4:07 am
*sigh*. This is getting funny. I’ll strip the URL (for context). It would be easier to delete if nothing was said about it, you know?
Jo Shields said,
December 17, 2008 at 4:09 am
Feel free to purge all spam-related comments from this post. They add nothing of value, and I won’t consider it in any way an attempt to suppress anything (and I’d hope your other critics don’t either).