07.05.08
Legal Mess at Linspire
Watch this new interview with Kevin Carmony. We previously wrote about the end of Linspire in [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7] and a cash inflow that he seems to be speaking of begs for some more questions about Microsoft and that mysterious deal. Maybe it’s not related to this. Being a private company, Linspire did not have to say much at the time. Groklaw raised concerns because of this. █





















Highlight: Novell was the first to acknowledge that Microsoft FUD tactics had substance. Novell then used anti-Linux FUD to market itself.
Highlight: Xandros let Microsoft make patent claims and brag about (paid-for) OOXML support.
Highlight: Linspire's CEO not only fell into Microsoft arms, but he also assisted the company's attack on GNU/Linux.
Highlight: Microsoft craves pseudo (proprietary) standards and gets its way using proxies and influence which it buys.
Highlight: The invasion into the open source world is intended to leave Linux companies neglected, due to financial incentives from Microsoft.
Analysis: Xen, an open source hypervisor, possibly fell victim to Microsoft's aggressive (and stealthy) acquisition-by-proxy strategy.
Anonymous Coward said,
July 5, 2008 at 7:03 am
What a piece of shit. I remember this shithead leaving posts at Ubuntu’s forums at UbuntuForums.org going on and on about CnR and Linspire, and now look where it’s (and he has) gone. People who make deals with Microsoft make me sick.