08.21.08
Reminder: Protest Against Software Patents This Weekend
From the Campaign for Document Freedom
few days ago, those protests in Bangalore received a quick mention. As background to this, consider [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]. The short version of this story: Microsoft and its partner in India are trying to legalise software patents in a nation that rejected them. Yes, again. It seems like another case of ballot-stuffing or chair-warming, i.e. voting by a minority with a common interest on ‘behalf’ of an entire nation. Watch what Richard Stallman wrote yesterday:
20 August 2008 (Microsoft corrupts the ISO)
Microsoft consummated its corruption of the International Standards Organization, which dismissed an appeal by several countries against the approval of OOXML.
However, I think the EU’s criminal investigation of this corruption is still live. (Is it?)
The investigation is ongoing. Some say it might be the cause for further ISO delays.
There is clearly some recognition of the fact that Microsoft will go as far as necessary to get its way. It desperately needs software patents in India. Now is the time to fight back.
The latest details about a peaceful protest are here:
Software patents are rejected by Indian Parliament in 2005 (Patent Amendment bill 2005). But Indian Government is now trying to push it through back door by bringing a Patent manual. Public consultations on this draft manual is going on in various metros in India. Bangalore Consultation is scheduled for the last week of August.
The Candle light vigil to “Say No To Software Patents” is a occasion to raise civil society voice against this back door trojan to Indian patent system.
On 23rd August 2008 in front of Town Hall near Corporation Circle, Bangalore. Publicity campaigns will be hosted in various places on 22nd.
There are some more details about the event in this page and the following article was published last week.
Nothing could be further from the truth. As explained above, software patents are bad for everyone other than large companies. Each software patent is a potential mine in the path to progress for small software companies. Allowing software patents in the country will be like strewing the path with mines.
Stay tuned for FSF India to unleash its response. There is already a mature draft of a lengthy letter.
Help the world fight against intellectual monopolies, a new embodiment of which is defended by the very same governments that dishonour them. Read the following letter:
As much as I utterly despise the entire premise of Intellectual Monopoly, this is about violating the principles of a Free License, and if it’s good enough for the British government to violate our civil rights in the name of Intellectual Monopoly, then it’s good enough for the Free World to protect its “property” (in fact Freedom) too…
There’s a book review that touches on the issue of Free software and intellectual monopolies. At least it’s a critical assessment.
A book on (gulp) law? Why would I want to read this? Well, if you’re a developer (open source or not) and you are at all interested in protecting the fruits of your labors, you will want to know this the same way you want to know about locking your house when you leave for work each morning. The next question is, “Will I understand anything the author is saying?”. Depends. If you’re an attorney, the answer is “yes”. If you’re a software engineer, the answer is…”yes”. What? How can that be? Turns out the author is both a software engineer and a practicing attorney (at least, according to the blurb on the back cover of the book). Is it possible he can speak to both audiences? Let’s find out.
Such a book which strives to mix (almost marry) FOSS and software patents is — perhaps unsurprisingly — from O’Reilly Media, which recently received payments from Diamond Sponsor Microsoft [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]. They are pro-OSS, but a little hostile or skeptical towards the philosophy of Free software. It’s only reason for apprehension. █
Highlight: Novell was the first to acknowledge that Microsoft FUD tactics had substance. Novell then used anti-Linux FUD to market itself. 
Highlight: Xandros let Microsoft make patent claims and brag about (paid-for) OOXML support. 
Highlight: Linspire's CEO not only fell into Microsoft arms, but he also assisted the company's attack on GNU/Linux. 
Highlight: Microsoft craves pseudo (proprietary) standards and gets its way using proxies and influence which it buys. 
Highlight: The invasion into the open source world is intended to leave Linux companies neglected, due to financial incentives from Microsoft. 
Analysis: Xen, an open source hypervisor, possibly fell victim to Microsoft's aggressive (and stealthy) acquisition-by-proxy strategy.