<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Links 27/08/2008: More GNU/Linux Laptops from Dell, Momentum Seems High, Cisco Buys PostPath</title>
	<atom:link href="http://boycottnovell.com/2008/08/27/cisco-buys-postpath/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://boycottnovell.com/2008/08/27/cisco-buys-postpath/</link>
	<description>Exploring the reality behind exclusionary deals with Microsoft and their subtle (yet severe) implications</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 22:18:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: gggggg</title>
		<link>http://boycottnovell.com/2008/08/27/cisco-buys-postpath/comment-page-1/#comment-20698</link>
		<dc:creator>gggggg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 18:51:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boycottnovell.com/2008/08/27/cisco-buys-postpath/#comment-20698</guid>
		<description>VueScan is proprietary software!

You don&#039;t pay any attention to what you post! It&#039;s pathetic!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>VueScan is proprietary software!</p>
<p>You don&#8217;t pay any attention to what you post! It&#8217;s pathetic!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gggggg</title>
		<link>http://boycottnovell.com/2008/08/27/cisco-buys-postpath/comment-page-1/#comment-20695</link>
		<dc:creator>gggggg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 18:49:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boycottnovell.com/2008/08/27/cisco-buys-postpath/#comment-20695</guid>
		<description>A link to an article about a software that disappeared about 2 years ago? Why?

http://www.xbiz.com/news/web/98339

Beryl is dead!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A link to an article about a software that disappeared about 2 years ago? Why?</p>
<p><a href="http://www.xbiz.com/news/web/98339" rel="nofollow">http://www.xbiz.com/news/web/98339</a></p>
<p>Beryl is dead!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roy Schestowitz</title>
		<link>http://boycottnovell.com/2008/08/27/cisco-buys-postpath/comment-page-1/#comment-20641</link>
		<dc:creator>Roy Schestowitz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 06:46:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boycottnovell.com/2008/08/27/cisco-buys-postpath/#comment-20641</guid>
		<description>re: Samsung

Thanks. Good find. That&#039;s in addition to their patent deal and Mono.

re: IE8

I was going to write about it later today.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>re: Samsung</p>
<p>Thanks. Good find. That&#8217;s in addition to their patent deal and Mono.</p>
<p>re: IE8</p>
<p>I was going to write about it later today.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hun</title>
		<link>http://boycottnovell.com/2008/08/27/cisco-buys-postpath/comment-page-1/#comment-20640</link>
		<dc:creator>Hun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 06:30:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boycottnovell.com/2008/08/27/cisco-buys-postpath/#comment-20640</guid>
		<description>Google is the taregt...

JagsLive sends in a Washington Post blog post reflecting on one privacy-enhancing feature of the upcoming Internet Explorer 8, the so-called &quot;InPrivate Blocking&quot; that has privacy advocates quietly cheering, and advertisers seriously worrying. Here is Microsoft&#039;s description of the feature. From the Post: &quot;The advertising industry is bracing for trouble from the next version of Microsoft&#039;s Internet Explorer, details of which were announced today, because it will offer a feature that blocks some ads and other content from third-parties that shows up on Web pages. A Microsoft spokesman said that the feature, to be known as &#039;InPrivate Blocking,&#039; was never designed to be an ad blocker, though &#039;there may be ads that get blocked.&#039; Instead, it was designed to stop tracking &#039;pixels&#039; or pieces of code that could allow third-party sites to track users as they move around the Web.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google is the taregt&#8230;</p>
<p>JagsLive sends in a Washington Post blog post reflecting on one privacy-enhancing feature of the upcoming Internet Explorer 8, the so-called &#8220;InPrivate Blocking&#8221; that has privacy advocates quietly cheering, and advertisers seriously worrying. Here is Microsoft&#8217;s description of the feature. From the Post: &#8220;The advertising industry is bracing for trouble from the next version of Microsoft&#8217;s Internet Explorer, details of which were announced today, because it will offer a feature that blocks some ads and other content from third-parties that shows up on Web pages. A Microsoft spokesman said that the feature, to be known as &#8216;InPrivate Blocking,&#8217; was never designed to be an ad blocker, though &#8216;there may be ads that get blocked.&#8217; Instead, it was designed to stop tracking &#8216;pixels&#8217; or pieces of code that could allow third-party sites to track users as they move around the Web.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hun</title>
		<link>http://boycottnovell.com/2008/08/27/cisco-buys-postpath/comment-page-1/#comment-20636</link>
		<dc:creator>Hun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 05:24:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boycottnovell.com/2008/08/27/cisco-buys-postpath/#comment-20636</guid>
		<description>http://excess.org/article/2008/07/dont-buy-anything-samsung/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://excess.org/article/2008/07/dont-buy-anything-samsung/" rel="nofollow">http://excess.org/article/2008/07/dont-buy-anything-samsung/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
