EditorsAbout the SiteComes vs. MicrosoftUsing This Web SiteSite ArchivesCredibility IndexOOXMLOpenDocumentPatentsNovellNews DigestSite NewsRSS


Microsoft Threatens Red Hat Again, Uses Novell as Excuse

Posted in GNU/Linux, Microsoft, Novell, Patents, Red Hat, Steve Ballmer at 2:56 pm by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

“No other large companies as far as I know use their employees as attack dogs to silen[ce] dissent. It’s time for Microsoft to stop this nonsense.”

The Prickly Prince From Microsoft Strikes Again


HE FSF may be doing too little against software patents at this stage, but it must not distract anyone from a most serious peril, which even Linus Torvalds is aware of and concerned about. it’s resolvable through dissemination of knowledge.

Every now and then, Microsoft makes snide remarks at Red Hat, claiming that Red Hat and its customers owe it money. This happened one year ago, just before Acacia hired some Microsoft Intellectual Monopoly people and then sued Red Hat [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11]. Now there is some more of this from Microsoft’s mouthpiece at CNET [1, 2]. The latest post contains little more than subtle (seemingly polite) Microsoft propaganda:

That doesn’t mean Microsoft is ready to sing Kumbaya with Red Hat, or other companies that haven’t made an IP deal with Redmond. While Microsoft is patient, Gutierrez indicated that Microsoft’s patience is not unlimited.

“If every effort to license proves not to be fruitful, ultimately we have a responsibility to customers that have licenses and to our shareholders to ensure our intellectual property is respected,” he said.

Microsoft has, on a number of occasions, asserted that Linux violates a ton of Microsoft patents, but Microsoft has never sued a company over those claims.


In an effort to help head off patent disputes, Microsoft is an investor in Nathan Myrhvold’s patent-buying Intellectual Ventures effort and has also made deals with several other such patent companies. “We’ve done deals with a number of others,” Gutierrez said.

On the positive side, though, are deals like the Novell one, Gutierrez said. In the end, Novell has grown its business, Microsoft got added revenue and customers end up with products that work better together. Gutierrez wouldn’t name names, but he said to expect more deals along the lines of the ones Microsoft struck with Novell and Sun Microsystems.

In case it’s not obvious, this short article ought to show why Novell is so dangerous to the freedom of Free software. Red Hat is being verbally threatened again.

Microsoft is also singing Novell’s “mixed source” tune, and not for the first time either. Novell happily brags about its “mixed source” identity [1, 2, 3, 4], insisting that it is not an open source company. This serves to justify Novell's own patent FUD and empowers Microsoft’s pressure on other GNU/Linux vendors. In turn, this helps Novell.

Nathan MyhrvoldIf they ever sue, there will be a strong reason for Red Hat to go to court, and there will be public fueling for Red Hat to go all the way up to the Supreme Court, using the assistance of many others to eliminate software patents once and for all.

In the disclosure above, Microsoft’s desperate strategy is showing. They admit to investing in the world's biggest and nastiest patent troll — something we already knew about (the personal investments from Bill Gates himself).

It ought to be added that the selective media does not tell the full story. Gutierrez is also one of the men behind extortion, namely the use of threats and software patents to secretly extract money from unnamed GNU/Linux users.

“There is nothing more that can be done. Everything we do is now available to licensees as well.”

Horacio Gutierrez, Microsoft Imaginary Property Officer

Horacio Gutierrez

Picture contributed by a reader

Share this post: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • co.mments
  • DZone
  • email
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • NewsVine
  • Print
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Facebook

If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

Pages that cross-reference this one


  1. xISO_ZWT said,

    October 18, 2008 at 4:31 pm


    If these patent threats have anything to it other than obviousness (Pg-Up/Pg-Dn, double-single click). They’re really scraping. Microsoft acts like anything that’s done on a PC is because they made it so. They did not invent the micro computer and the Abacus is prior art.

    Didn’t know Gutierrez was a bottom-feeding, patent troll like Intellectual Vultures, Nathan Myrhvold. Corruption feeds corruption.

  2. Roy Schestowitz said,

    October 18, 2008 at 4:52 pm


    Microsoft acts like anything that’s done on a PC is because they made it so. They did not invent the micro computer and the Abacus is prior art.

    Mundie: Google owes business to Microsoft

    Microsoft Invented the iPod?

  3. xISO_ZWT said,

    October 18, 2008 at 5:14 pm


    quote/ “If we didn’t succeed at the PC, they wouldn’t have a business,” Mundie said /quote

    And if the inventor of the wheel didn’t succeed we wouldn’t be traveling in autos.

    quote/ Mundie said. “I’d like to see Google and someone else come up with something that really threatens our business model.” /quote

    How about honest Anti-Trust Law enforcement.

    quote/ ….Microsoft is now rumored to be mounting a proxy fight for Yahoo. /quote
    quote/ ….”Right now, we’d just like to close the Yahoo deal,” he said. /quote

    The trains’s leaving the station and MS is running hard to catch the door.
    As for the iPod, we were talking about that in one of our discussions; one of the guys said it was, “MS Submarine Patent Filing v1.1″. Look for success in the marketplace and if there’s no patent, file one, even if you don’t have the product.

  4. selller_liar said,

    October 18, 2008 at 6:13 pm


    Patents is the most stupid invention of the world.

    The greed is making the people enclosure the knowledge.
    People want to make money doing nothing.

    This system does not work anymore.Patents are not suitable for all this technology which produce fast ideas and innovation.

    Maybe patents was suitable in 400 years ago where are nothing globalized and connected.But this not work anymore.

    Patents should be destroyed ,both physical and non-physical .

  5. Roy Schestowitz said,

    October 19, 2008 at 5:02 am


    Little update:

    Groklaw has just done a post about it as well.


    More Patent Threats From Microsoft

    But what is clearer to me now is that Microsoft is apparently determined to control or destroy FOSS as we know it. And they think patents give them the power to do it. What I think will really happen is a whole mess of litigation, including some antitrust claims. I don’t rule out Red Hat’s ability to be legally creative, of course, but no one can do a Novell-style deal again, with respect to GPLv3 code, without triggering results [PDF] I am sure Microsoft would not wish for.

  6. HarryTuttle said,

    October 20, 2008 at 4:17 am


    It is remarkable silent from those shills like AlexH…
    Believe it or not:
    Like the money-system had to come to an end and cost the public soso many dollars, investing in mono and MS-technology-clones is for obvious reasons the same ticking bomb…

  7. Roy Schestowitz said,

    October 20, 2008 at 4:26 am


    I’ll ping Alex. Let’s see how he responds to this.

  8. AlexH said,

    October 20, 2008 at 4:31 am


    Respond to what, exactly?

  9. Roy Schestowitz said,

    October 20, 2008 at 4:33 am


    We are showing you, Alex. Microsoft is threatening Free software using patents.

  10. Roy Schestowitz said,

    October 20, 2008 at 4:34 am


    I should add: how come Sun or IBM don’t do the same? Who would possibly want to aggravate users of Free(dom) software?

  11. AlexH said,

    October 20, 2008 at 4:38 am


    Microsoft have done this for years, that’s nothing new. I don’t see anything which particularly deserves my response here.

  12. Roy Schestowitz said,

    October 20, 2008 at 4:41 am


    You seem to insist that Microsoft is no more risk than other companies. The news above contradicts you.

  13. AlexH said,

    October 20, 2008 at 4:48 am


    No, I didn’t offer any opinion on who was the greater risk. What I did say was that they are not the only risk.

    Seems like you are pretty much the only person trying to scare free software users:

    No one I know, including FOSS lawyers, is losing any sleep over these threats.

  14. Roy Schestowitz said,

    October 20, 2008 at 4:52 am


    Just as PJ implied Microsoft was desperate, so did I:

    If they ever sue, there will be a strong reason for Red Hat to go to court, and there will be public fueling for Red Hat to go all the way up to the Supreme Court, using the assistance of many others to eliminate software patents once and for all.

    Don’t try to accuse /us/ of being the bad guy.

  15. AlexH said,

    October 20, 2008 at 4:53 am


    Hide behind PJ, uhuh :) I’m not accusing her of anything – in fact, I’m pointing out her entirely sensible position of not listening to Microsoft’s idle threats.

    You want people to be scared of all this PR fluff. PJ’s not losing sleep over it, neither am I.

  16. Roy Schestowitz said,

    October 20, 2008 at 4:56 am


    Nor I. Yet she points out that Microsoft is threatening again, as did I. Your attitude here is two-faced.

  17. AlexH said,

    October 20, 2008 at 5:00 am


    No, my attitude isn’t two-faced at all. We can all agree that Microsoft is issuing threats, as they have done for years and probably will do for years – that’s how they work.

    Where we differ is our *response* to the threats.

  18. Roy Schestowitz said,

    October 20, 2008 at 5:04 am


    Yes, you permit the entry of Trojan horses, whereas I stand against it.

  19. AlexH said,

    October 20, 2008 at 5:08 am


    What do trojan horses have to do with Microsoft threatening Red Hat?

  20. Roy Schestowitz said,

    October 20, 2008 at 5:16 am


    They may be putting them in GNU/Linux.

  21. AlexH said,

    October 20, 2008 at 5:20 am


    Except that Microsoft’s threats are nothing to do with Mono, and if Red Hat felt threatened by that one piece of software they could drop it tomorrow.

  22. Roy Schestowitz said,

    October 20, 2008 at 5:33 am


    Except that Microsoft’s threats are nothing to do with Mono, and if Red Hat felt threatened by that one piece of software they could drop it tomorrow.


    BTW, Microsoft’s little ‘propaganda piece’ is finding its way into more sites this morning.


  23. pcole said,

    October 20, 2008 at 5:43 am


    microsoft is losing (not making) big bucks; Many SMBs and larger business entities are refusing to migrate to “hasta la vista”. Recently ballmer said the coming windows 7 is based on vista. Once again you see ms try to coerce it’s customers into the “upgrade” thread. The clients are not having any of it. It’s seems like an impasse for ms – either it cleans up its dealings or it’s time to sing “The party’s over”.

  24. Roy Schestowitz said,

    October 20, 2008 at 5:46 am


    Its party’s over.

    Now it’s time to defend FOSS from a patent troll (by proxy) and shameless aggressor. That’s what this site is about.

  25. AlexH said,

    October 20, 2008 at 6:02 am


    I would suggest that “defending FOSS” ought to be considered to include “not attacking FOSS projects”. IMHO, obviously…

  26. Roy Schestowitz said,

    October 20, 2008 at 6:07 am


    Warning about possible dangers != attacking.

  27. AlexH said,

    October 20, 2008 at 6:12 am


    Actually, it is. Take for example the article about Apache. Most of the article talks about patents, in the context of Hadoop. You later agreed that patents were completely irrelevant. But the article hasn’t been corrected.

    That’s not “warning” or “informing”.

  28. Roy Schestowitz said,

    October 20, 2008 at 6:15 am


    There was no mentioning there of patents. That second part of the post was a reference to .NET, not Web server software. Only *then* was the notion of patents introduced.

  29. AlexH said,

    October 20, 2008 at 6:19 am


    Sorry, but no. You repeated the blog post which said “there may be some “patented” technologies in [Hadoop]“, and called it “Predictable” and said they did the same thing to PHP.

    You asked if I thought that was FUD, and of course it is. But it still remains up there.

    So your revisionist history doesn’t work. Patents were mentioned with regards to Apache.

  30. Roy Schestowitz said,

    October 20, 2008 at 6:25 am


    The quote “there may be some “patented” technologies” comes from Glyn Moody. Perhaps you should head over to ComputerWorld and debate this with Glyn, who is always open for discussion. You did not show me saying that there are patents in Apache/Hadoop (I was saying about something else that it was predictable.

    If anything, your explanation above seems like misattribution that fits well with your pattern of crusading against this Web site.

  31. AlexH said,

    October 20, 2008 at 6:39 am


    Thanks for trying to malign me Roy, but didn’t attribute it to you; I said you repeated it.

  32. Roy Schestowitz said,

    October 20, 2008 at 6:42 am


    I included a large block of text. Since you previously insinuated that Groklaw does not spread what you referred to as “FUD”, perhaps you should, at this moment, check out:


    ” * What Comes After “Embrace, Extend”?
    * 11:27AM October 10/19/08, 2008
    * Alongside that embracing, we have some potential extending:

    Few will have noticed, but Microsoft’s Jim Kellerman just announced that he and a Microsoft colleague have “been cleared to contribute patches again” to Apache, and specifically to the Hadoop project.

    This is how it will go. Purely in order to “improve” the performance of Apache and Hadoop on the Windows platform, Microsoft will helpfully offer some really cool hacks….which will of course only work on the Windows platform.

    This will effectively fork the Apache/Hadoop/whatever code – all for the good of their communities. Of course, there may be some “patented” technologies in there, but Microsoft will promise never, ever to sue anyone using this “optimised” open source – cross its heart and hope to die. Look for Microsoft to get involved with other leading open source projects in the same way. – Glynn Moody, ComputerWorld UK”

  33. AlexH said,

    October 20, 2008 at 6:50 am


    Groklaw doesn’t offer commentary or opinion.

    You asked me if I thought it was FUD; what do you think?

  34. Roy Schestowitz said,

    October 20, 2008 at 7:02 am


    You claimed that repeating it is FUD. Why don’t you contact Glyn? It’s clearly something he wrote that you disagree with, but you vent out your frustration at this site.

  35. Michael Meyers said,

    October 20, 2008 at 7:38 am


    LMAO Boy, you are such a wiener.

    Microsoft is spreading some unfounded claims, someone stop the press, that’s a new one … not.

    Only thing I’m missing is the obligatory Novell libel.

  36. AlexH said,

    October 20, 2008 at 7:44 am


    @Roy: I think it’s highly enlightening that you won’t answer a simple question…. ;)

  37. Roy Schestowitz said,

    October 20, 2008 at 7:46 am


    Which question?

  38. Dan O'Brian said,

    October 20, 2008 at 8:14 am


    The last question he asked, maybe?

  39. Roy Schestowitz said,

    October 20, 2008 at 8:31 am


    Groklaw found it worthy of inclusion and quoting. Alex would deny that it’s FUD because it is not quoted by a site he disagrees with.

  40. Michael Meyers said,

    October 20, 2008 at 8:51 am


    Oh Boy … :D

    Once again you are avoiding the question but are just babbling along …

    The questions wasn’t what Alex would, in your opinion, deny or not, but, to quote it, “You asked me if I thought it was FUD; what do you think?”.

    So, perhaps, since the question is now clearly pointed out, you manage now to answer it?

  41. Roy Schestowitz said,

    October 20, 2008 at 8:56 am


    Alex asked a rhetorical question, daring me to read his mind. My guess and answer is “No”.

  42. AlexH said,

    October 20, 2008 at 8:59 am


    It wasn’t a rhetorical question, and I’m not sure why you think I was “daring you to read my mind” given I stated the question in extremely simple terms.

    But anyway, it appears you think that it’s not FUD to say that Microsoft will be putting patented code into Apache… well. That speaks volumes, I guess.

  43. Roy Schestowitz said,

    October 20, 2008 at 9:01 am


    No, your question as I read it was about whether /you/ thought Groklaw had been FUDding Apache merely by quoting Glyn.

  44. AlexH said,

    October 20, 2008 at 9:06 am


    Ok, so now we’re clear on the question: is Glyn’s article about the potential danger of software patents in Apache FUD or not?

  45. Roy Schestowitz said,

    October 20, 2008 at 9:11 am


    If he suggests that Microsoft will try to poison Apache/Hadoop with software patents, then I disagree with him because they don’t need to do this. Knowing Glyn’s history (we also correspond sometimes), he didn’t intend to FUD Apache; he aggressively works to defend Free software from many dangers, including software patents.

    I still suggest you contact Glyn.

  46. AlexH said,

    October 20, 2008 at 9:15 am


    Well, we know what road is paved with good intentions.

    Making a statement about a contributor putting patents in Apache is conjuring demons where there are none. Intentional or not, it’s still FUD.

  47. Roy Schestowitz said,

    October 20, 2008 at 11:15 am


    Fine. Please inform Glyn then. Stop throwing accusations at sites you dislike merely for quoting another.

    By the way, the Ina Fried shill has not thrown those threats (by proxy) for the first time here. A couple of months ago s/he mentioned Red Hat out of the blue in some post about cross-licensing deals. Microsoft is still using mouthpieces and it is /THEM/ you should criticise; not me, not Glyn, thank you very much. :-)

    Please try to recognise the /real/ threats, not those who merely /inform/ about it.

What Else is New

  1. Links 21/3/2018: Cutelyst 2, More on webOS

    Links for the day

  2. SUEPO: “Today May Be Your Last Chance to Demonstrate Against the Seriously Flawed Reforms That Mr Battistelli Has Imposed” on EPO Staff

    Benoît Battistelli will likely remain involved in EPO affairs for a long time to come (even through a fellow Frenchman, Campinos, whom he swaps two chairs with at the Office and CEIPI), but today is the last opportunity for EPO staff to march in protest against the Battistelli regime, which for the first time ever will result in major staff cuts and growing irrelevance for the Office

  3. Links 20/3/2018: GStreamer 1.14.0, Freespire 3.0, Endless OS 3.3.13

    Links for the day

  4. BIO, MDMA and PhRMA Are Pushing the PTAB-Hostile STRONGER Patents Act While IAM and Patently-O Continue to Bash PTAB

    The patent microcosm, which compares the Board to the above (crude analogy from Judge Rader and other patent extremists), is still trying to kill inter partes reviews (IPRs), in effect overlooking its own hypocrisy on the matter (they don’t want patent justice, they just want to metaphorically ‘shoot down’ the judges)

  5. 35 U.S.C. § 101 is Still Effectively Tackling Software Patents in the US, But Patent Law Firms Lie/Distort to 'Sell' These Anyway

    The assertion that software patents are still worth pursuing in 2018 is based on carefully-constructed spin which mis-frames several court decisions and underplays/downplays/ignores pretty much everything that does not suit the narrative

  6. Battistelli's EPO Became Extremely Reliant on China for Distraction and on Endless Supply of Applications (Supply Which Doesn't Exist)

    Discussion about the EPO granting machine (or patent-printing machine) and figures the way EPO management would rather the public won't ever see them; the concept that China means redemption for this patent system is as laughable as always

  7. The US International Trade Commission (USITC) Against Comcast, Courtesy of the Intellectual Ventures-Connected Rovi

    The USITC/ITC, which mostly serves to impose embargoes (sometimes in shocking defiance of PTAB decisions), is being invoked by a firm connected to the world’s largest patent troll, Intellectual Ventures

  8. Tinder/Match Group Uses Software Patents to Sue a Rival, Obviously Choosing to Sue in Texas

    Software patents are being used for leverage, but only those which were likely granted before Alice and only in courts at districts somewhere around Texas

  9. Links 19/3/2018: Linux 4.16 RC6, Atom 1.25, antiX 17.1, GNU Mcron 1.1

    Links for the day

  10. From PTAB Bashing to Federal Circuit (CAFC) Bashing: How the Patent 'Industry' Sells Software Patents

    The latest tactics of the patent microcosm are just about as distasteful as last month's (or last year's), with focus shifting to the courts and few broadly-misinterpreted patent cases (mainly Finjan, Berkheimer, and Aatrix)

  11. Patent Maximalists Keep Coming Up With New Terms and Buzzwords to Bypass the Practical Ban on Software Patents

    The fightback against Section 101 and the US Supreme Court (notably Alice) seems to concentrate on old and new buzzwords, such as "Software as a Medical Device" ("SaMD") or "Fourth Industrial Revolution" ("4IR"), which the EPO recently paid European media to spread and promote

  12. News About Patents is Often Just Advertisements Composed Directly or Indirectly by Companies That Sell Patents and Patent Services

    Infomercials are still dominant among news about patents, in effect drowning out the signal (real journalism) and instead pushing agenda that is detached from reality, pertinent facts, objective assessment, public interest and so on

  13. Blocks and Paywalls Won't Protect the Patent Trolls' Lobby From Scrutiny/Fact-Checking

    Joff Wild and Benoît Battistelli have much in common, including patent maximalism and chronic resistance to facts (or fact-checking)

  14. China Has Become Very Aggressive With Patents

    China now targets other Asian countries/firms -- more so than Western firms -- with patent lawsuits; we expect this to get worse in years to come

  15. UPC/Battistelli Booster IAM Blames Brexit Rather Than EPO Abuses

    While the EPO is collapsing due to mismanagement the boosters of Team Battistelli would rather deflect and speak about Brexit, which is itself partly motivated by such mismanagement

  16. European Commission Again Urged to Tackle Abuses at the European Patent Office (EPO)

    Rina Ronja Kari is the latest MEP attempting to compel the Commission to actually do something about the EPO other than turning a blind eye

  17. Links 18/3/2018: Wine 3.4, Wine-Staging 3.4, KDE Connect 1.8 for Android

    Links for the day

  18. TXED Courts Are Causing Businesses to Leave the District, Notably For Fear That Having Any Operations Based There is a Legal Liability

    A discussion about the infamous abundance of patent cases in the Eastern District of Texas (TXED/EDTX) and what this will mean for businesses that have branches or any form of operations there (making them subjected to lawsuits in that district even after TC Heartland)

  19. PTAB Hatred is So Intense Among the Patent 'Industry' That Even Scammers Are Hailed as Champions If They Target PTAB

    The patent microcosm is so eager to stop the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) that it's supporting sham deals (or "scams") and exploits/distorts the voice of the new USPTO Director to come up with PTAB-hostile catchphrases

  20. The Patent 'Industry' is Increasingly Mocking CAFC and Its Judges Because It Doesn't Like the Decisions

    Judgmental patent maximalists are still respecting high courts only when it suits them; whenever the outcome is not desirable they're willing to attack the legitimacy of the courts and the competence of judges, even resorting to racist ad hominem attacks if necessary

  21. The Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) Carries on Enforcing § 101, Invalidating Software Patents and Upsetting the Patent 'Industry' in the Process

    A quick report on where PTAB stands at the moment, some time ahead of the Oil States decision (soon to come from the US Supreme Court)

  22. Luxembourg Can Become a Hub of Patent Trolls If the EPO Carries on With Its 'Reforms', Even Without the UPC

    With or without the Unified Patent Court (UPC), which is the wet dream of patent trolls and their legal representatives, the EPO's terrible policies have landed a lot of low-quality patents on the hands of patent trolls (many of which operate through city-states that exist for tax evasion -- a fiscal environment ripe for shells)

  23. The Patent 'Printing Machine' of the EPO Will Spawn Many Lawsuits and Extortions (Threats of Lawsuits), in Effect Taxing Europe

    The money-obsessed, money-printing patent office, where the assembly line mentality has been adopted and patent-printing management is in charge, is devaluing or diluting the pool of European Patents, more so with restrictions (monetary barriers) to challenging bad patents

  24. Links 17/3/2018: Varnish 6, Wine 3.4

    Links for the day

  25. Deleted EPO Tweets and Promotion of Software Patents Amid Complaints About Abuse and Demise of Patent Quality

    Another ordinary day at the EPO with repressions of workforce, promotion of patents that aren't even allowed, and Team UPC failing to get its act together

  26. Guest Post: Suspected “Whitewashing” Operations by Željko Topić in Croatia

    Articles about EPO Vice-President Željko Topić are disappearing and sources indicate that it’s a result of yet more SLAPP from him

  27. Monumental Effort to Highlight Decline in Quality of European Patents (a Quarter of Examiners Sign Petition in Spite of Fear), Yet Barely Any Press Coverage

    he media in Europe continues to be largely apathetic towards the EPO crisis, instead relaying a bunch of press releases and doctored figures from the EPO; only blogs that closely follow EPO scandals bothered mentioning the new petition

  28. Careful Not to Conflate UPC Critics With AfD or Anti-EU Elements

    The tyrannical Unified Patent Court (UPC) is being spun as something that only fascists would oppose after the right-wing, anti-EU politicians in Germany express strong opposition to it

  29. Links 15/3/2018: Qt Creator 4.6 RC, Microsoft Openwashing

    Links for the day

  30. PTAB Continues to Increase Capacity Ahead of Oil States; Patent Maximalists Utterly Upset

    The Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) sees the number of filings up to an almost all-time high and efforts to undermine PTAB are failing pretty badly -- a trend which will be further cemented quite soon when the US Supreme Court (quite likely) backs the processes of PTAB


RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time


Recent Posts