EditorsAbout the SiteComes vs. MicrosoftUsing This Web SiteSite ArchivesCredibility IndexOOXMLOpenDocumentPatentsNovellNews DigestSite NewsRSS

12.28.08

Tha*k You Too, Joseph

Posted in Mono, Site News at 10:28 am by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

“Know what? Fuck it, and fuck you. I’m done.”

jo Shields

Share this post: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • co.mments
  • DZone
  • email
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • NewsVine
  • Print
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Facebook

If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

Pages that cross-reference this one

42 Comments

  1. Diamond Wakizashi said,

    December 28, 2008 at 11:13 am

    Gravatar

    Who will tell us about the joys of using Microsoft’s low quality vendor lock-in garbage?

  2. Shane Coyle said,

    December 28, 2008 at 11:13 am

    Gravatar

    I had visions of fixing the place up in the coming year, in terms of it’s credibility, but I think it’s safe to say at this point that it’s time for me to hop off the crazy-train too.

    This all way-too-closely resembles "Fight Club" for me – when we had folks in India being arrested over Novell protests, or whatever that was, I really had to rethink where this was all headed.

    I was recently invited to take a look through the archives, and frankly – more often than not – the "peanut gallery" was/is right. I haven’t spent nearly enough time here to properly guide the site in the direction I wanted.

    Lately, it seems the program is to eradicate all contrary opinion, even those who are armed with facts, and to cajole and antagonize them – accusing them of astroturfing or worse, all the while ignoring their facts until they finally give up and leave, muttering to themselves.

    I wanted to take part in intelligent discussions on the Microsoft-Novell deal and it’s subtle (yet severe) implications. Guess I’ll have to go to slashdot for that… So, just pull my pic from the front page – leave my articles for the archives, although I suppose this comment will not make it through the new censorship policy.

    Have a happy New Year to all, I’m going away until after the 5th. After that, perhaps I will stop in to see what y’all have done with the place.

  3. Roy Schestowitz said,

    December 28, 2008 at 11:35 am

    Gravatar

    Shane,

    The Novell deal has always been a controversial one and to expect no backlash here is to also expect no backlash from a site like Groklaw. Because Novell was ‘closer’ to the community than SCO was prior to the act means that there are some folks who are not sure what to think.

    If we were not on target, then we would not have one of the better-known pro-GNU/Linux sites list us among top blogs of 2008.

  4. Josh Bell said,

    December 28, 2008 at 11:37 am

    Gravatar

    I’m done too. What this site/blog has become is contrary to it’s stated mission. It moved beyond that a long time ago. So long Roy, hope you have a nice life.

  5. Roy Schestowitz said,

    December 28, 2008 at 11:40 am

    Gravatar

    Josh,

    You’ve always just heckled this Web site. it’s not as though you changed your mind.

  6. Ian said,

    December 28, 2008 at 11:50 am

    Gravatar

    I don’t blame him or you Shane. It seems to me, most of the people who disagree with many of the messages coming from Roy don’t seem to be necessarily pro Microsoft. Actually, some do more positive work for free software in general than anyone else here. The general sentiment seems to be to throw enough crap against the wall and see what sticks, and ignore whatever doesn’t. It’s wholly black and white attitude does nobody good and the only redeeming value, in my opinion, are the comments and the actual discussion no matter how fruitless it is.

  7. Roy Schestowitz said,

    December 28, 2008 at 12:00 pm

    Gravatar

    I don’t blame him or you Shane. It seems to me, most of the people who disagree with many of the messages coming from Roy don’t seem to be necessarily pro Microsoft.

    They are not pro Microsoft, but by failing to recognise how Microsoft tries to weaken Free software (e.g. by changing the meaning of “open source”, demanding payments for patents, etc.) they allow themselves to be led to the point where they actually help Microsoft cause damage. They just don’t realise it yet. Remember that EEE comes in 3 phases. The first one is romanticism.

    It’s wholly black and white attitude does nobody good and the only redeeming value, in my opinion, are the comments and the actual discussion no matter how fruitless it is.

    True, and we don’t censor comments, despite some readers’ suggestions that we do. Groklaw, on the other hand, does censor comments and PJ advised me to do the same here (but I don’t, because I’m no Beranger and I’m open to discussion).

    There are some characters here who come only to attack readers and messengers. Their intention is to have others agonise and to make things unpleasant for everyone.

  8. AlexH said,

    December 28, 2008 at 12:03 pm

    Gravatar

    I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again; there are occasionally stories on here which warrant more attention, even if it’s just a retread of what an IT new site is running. Patents being an obvious example.

    But there is so much dross and so many attacks on minorities in the free software community, I do wish that would stop. You can believe that Mono isn’t going to eat people’s babies without being a Microsoft “shill”.

    I’m sad to see Shane go. I remember a number of recent converations we’ve had and I would have liked to see more articles from someone other than Roy. With just Roy reposting stuff, it is a blog which just tries to achieve quantity by reposting anything matching a few keywords. People can use Google Alerts and get the exact same stuff.

  9. Roy Schestowitz said,

    December 28, 2008 at 12:18 pm

    Gravatar

    Where and when did I repost anything?

  10. AlexH said,

    December 28, 2008 at 12:35 pm

    Gravatar

    You rarely research anything, Roy – most of what you post is a repost of something else in some smaller or larger amount; be it all repost (the links articles, the videos, the quote of someone else’s article) or minor repost (some small part of text in a wider piece of commentary and/or opinion). It’s clear to see that even from this article, which is just a repost.

  11. Roy Schestowitz said,

    December 28, 2008 at 12:38 pm

    Gravatar

    It’s clear to see that even from this article, which is just a repost.

    Well, it’s not an article.

  12. AlexH said,

    December 28, 2008 at 1:11 pm

    Gravatar

    Oh yes, “blog post”, because that makes it ok.

  13. Roy Schestowitz said,

    December 28, 2008 at 3:18 pm

    Gravatar

    The style is informal.

    By the way, we’ve received so much comment spam recently (over 500 a day) and it took too long to check, so I disabled new comments for posts before Xmas. I hope Shane won’t mind.

  14. G. Michaels said,

    December 28, 2008 at 6:19 pm

    Gravatar

    I hope Shane won’t mind.

    Judging from what he just said, I don’t think he will. At all.

    Is this the point where you start insinuating he might work for Microsoft, invoke glitzy-sounding quotes, call him a shill and a heckler and unleash your attack poodles on him, or does that come later? Funny red text cannot be far behind :)

    Note: writer of this comment adds absolutely nothing but stalking and personal attacks against readers, as documented here.

  15. Dan O'Brian said,

    December 28, 2008 at 8:01 pm

    Gravatar

    I think it’s far more likely that you disabled comments on those posts because you were proven incorrect and decided you had to prevent any further embarrassment.

  16. Dan O'Brian said,

    December 28, 2008 at 8:02 pm

    Gravatar

    (FWIW, Shane’s comment above seems to align with what I’ve seen on this site as well – pretty amusing that Shane used to be on your side when he started this site – now even he thinks you’re a joke, Roy.)

  17. Roy Schestowitz said,

    December 28, 2008 at 8:17 pm

    Gravatar

    No, the comments were disabled because I spent almost an hour a week wading through spam.

    As for Shane, he too was attacked by readers who cursed back in the early days. There is no way to run such a site with such a statement and name without a level of friction.

  18. G. Michaels said,

    December 28, 2008 at 8:25 pm

    Gravatar

    There is no way to run such a site with such a statement and name without a level of friction.

    Yes well, that’s certainly one way to spin it.

    I am left wondering though, why he didn’t do this through an email or some other sort of private communication instead of a very public statement?

    I can almost picture you desperately pulling up the WP admin interface to check the IP address on that post and suddenly realizing your worst fear :)

    Note: writer of this comment adds absolutely nothing but stalking and personal attacks against readers, as documented here.

  19. twitter said,

    December 29, 2008 at 12:43 am

    Gravatar

    Check the IP address? That’s a good idea because Shane’s post looks like a fake. I would have expected something more constructive than “the hecklers are right” from an editor of this site. You know, details about what they are right about. This bit is especially crazy:

    when we had folks in India being arrested over Novell protests, or whatever that was, I really had to rethink where this was all headed.

    Novell had people in India arrested, not Boycott Novell, of course. If that really is you Shane, shame on yourself for not paying enough attention to Roy to be able to understand him before condeming him. Roy has made this place a real resource and deserves better than this.

  20. Todd Razuri said,

    December 29, 2008 at 2:22 am

    Gravatar

    It must take a *lot* of nerve for you to come in here and presume to tell people about fakes and the like.

    And I don’t see how that comment was condemning anything. You and Roy really need to get over yourselves. The credibility of this site is going down the drain fast, along with the traffic I’m sure.

  21. stevetheFLY said,

    December 29, 2008 at 7:26 am

    Gravatar

    twitter’s comment really proves Shane right. This site has been doing the cause it was started for a disservice for a long time. And Roy’s personality is to blame for that.

    Note: comment has been flagged for arriving from an incarnation of a known (eet), pseudonymous, forever-nymshifting, abusive Internet troll that posts from open proxies and relays around the world.

  22. Roy Schestowitz said,

    December 29, 2008 at 9:05 am

    Gravatar

    @Todd Razuri, twitter:

    No, it’s not a fake. Shane and I will discuss it by E-mail.

    Just some minor clarifications/corrections:

    * There is no moderation policy and we never deleted comments (a few were delayed because they were in the filter).

    * The protest in India had nothing to do with us. I didn’t even know about until after it had happened.

    I understand that running this site comes with a degree of liability, so I can understand why Shane feels this way. If you look at Groklaw’s members-only post (in the front page), then you’ll see that PJ had similar concerns. She hasn’t posted in almost one month.

  23. Shane Coyle said,

    December 29, 2008 at 9:48 am

    Gravatar

    Running to airport, but some clarifications – firstly, my sense of humor doesn’t port well to text – it is very dry, the fight club / india protest things were tongue-in-cheek (and I never meant to imply that ‘we – BN’ had the people arrested, I sometimes poorly sentences construct.

    Liability concerns aside, of which there are many, this post in particular seemed to exemplify how this site has degenerated more into personal attacks and arguments in both directions than substantive discussions on the issues.

    Maybe I just desperately need a vacation. See y’all on the 5th (and it is me ).

  24. Roy Schestowitz said,

    December 29, 2008 at 9:56 am

    Gravatar

    Shane, point well taken. This post was redundant in hindsight.

  25. twitter said,

    December 29, 2008 at 10:48 am

    Gravatar

    Coverage of the India protests was excellent and just the sort of thing this site should be about. Novell was caught deceptively subverting a free software conference and then the protesters were rough handled and arrested. Boycot Novell helped to embarrass those responsible by talking to those involved and documenting the events. The protesters also got useful information and artwork from Boycott Novell.

    Have a good time on vacation Shane, I hope it gives you the reset you need to recognize the Slog against BN. When you come back, try hanging out in IRC where the real discussion and back and forth takes place. Hecklers get the boot there and the discusions are sane and friendly without them. You can look at the heckler histories to see that the abuse and nit pick to fact ratio is close to unity and from that you might understand Roy’s attitude. The more you read of Roy’s material, the better you think of his credibility. A casual observer is easily misled.

    The solution to M$ heckling is not to shut down, it’s to publish more. The more sites there are, the more costly it is for M$ to spam them all. The defeat of Groklaw and Technocrat free those resources for attacks against Slashdot, Boycott Novell and other sites.

    I can respect you not wanting to be involved in this Shane but I don’t think Fight Club jokes are funny. That is exactly the image M$ would like to project on Boycott Novell and free software advocates in general. Coverage of free software, the fight against software patents, OOXML and other corruption all point to the main thrust of Roy’s work and show that the site is positive reinforcement for the free software community. There’s no other site out there collecting as much useful information as Roy does. Why would you want to compare that to Fight Club – a hapless handfull of people beating the crap out of each other on the directions of an insane person? Because one or two professional hecklers say so?

  26. twitter said,

    December 29, 2008 at 10:50 am

    Gravatar

    correction: heckler signal to noise ratio is zero.

  27. Roy Schestowitz said,

    December 29, 2008 at 12:18 pm

    Gravatar

    A few quick points:

    1. I’ve just been told that PJ might permanently step out of Groklaw.

    2. We don’t kick hecklers out of IRC. twitter was incorrect where he was suggesting this, but hecklers just don’t choose IRC as the medium for heckling.

    3. I receive E-mails from very important people whom I can’t name. Although they never comment, they agree with what I publish here and commend it.

    Here is is message I received half an hour ago. I don’t know how you’ll interpret it, but take it as it is.

    “I read, first with alarm and then with relief, Shane’s recent posts on BN. His first post gave the impression that he no longer supports you and that he blames you for the seemingly endless threads which degenerate to insults. In that case, I would consider that an overreaction. It seems to me that someone probably wrote to him to complain, he scanned the archives and made an initial quick assessment that he thought your detractors were factually right on a frequent basis. His quick assessment may even be correct, but I personally haven’t kept track of that because it’s not important to me to keep any kind of score.”

    “Overall, I consider that the hecklers sometimes make valid points but those points often do not invalid your overall argument. In those cases, it doesn’t hurt to concede their point. More often, they are only trying to convey their opinion and, when you don’t agree, they get frustrated and start repeated ad hominem attacks in hopes that some may be impressed by their sheer repetition and that you would lose credibility. They likely justify themselves by thinking that “the opposition is no better.” The trouble is that they cheapen their own arguments and they lose credibility themselves. You haven’t lowered yourself to their level, but their behaviour does cause a problem because it lowers the level of discourse on the forum.

    “I wish I knew the proper responce. I was a bit heartened by Shane’s most recent post where he clarifies himself. I hope that, once he meditates on things some more, that he can have some constructive ideas on how to raise the level of discussion in the forum. The answer is not easy because there are some who only want to disrupt the forum and there are some others who have some vested interests and are not receptive to the ideas that Novell and Microsoft are behaving improperly, that contributing to Mono/go-oo is harmful, etc. Perhaps the answer is to continue to take the high road and leave the insults to others. Whatever you decide, I continue to support your effort.”

  28. homburg-hansen said,

    December 29, 2008 at 12:34 pm

    Gravatar

    I receive E-mails from very important people whom I can’t name.

    As far as I’m concerend, these ‘important people’ might as well only exist as voices in your head. If they aren’t afraid to be associated with the stuff you write they should step forward and comment. If they are afraid the value of what they say equals zero.

    My guess is, they are so utterly unimportant that you’d rather not tell.

  29. Roy Schestowitz said,

    December 29, 2008 at 12:39 pm

    Gravatar

    There are many things that many people want to say but can’t. This site tells those things shamelessly, so they appreciate it.

  30. homburg-hansen said,

    December 29, 2008 at 12:43 pm

    Gravatar

    Yeah, I’m sure these ‘very important people’ are afraid that Bill Gates might round them up and shoot them or something…

    ‘Very important people’ and ‘afraid’ doesn’t go together well, does it?

  31. Roy Schestowitz said,

    December 29, 2008 at 12:51 pm

    Gravatar

    Yeah, I’m sure these ‘very important people’ are afraid that Bill Gates might round them up and shoot them or something…

    Discrediting by exaggeration. Well known troll tactic…

  32. homburg-hansen said,

    December 29, 2008 at 1:15 pm

    Gravatar

    By god, the reputation of this website is well-deserved. Everybody who disagrees with you is a troll, right? Well, good-bye to you and your website!

  33. Roy Schestowitz said,

    December 29, 2008 at 1:15 pm

    Gravatar

    Another clarification that ought to be made: In India, nobody was arrested. They were escorted out for a friendly non-violent protest where they used posters. That’s what made it so vexing. It’s about freedom of speech, not just freedom in general.

  34. Roy Schestowitz said,

    December 29, 2008 at 1:19 pm

    Gravatar

    Well, good-bye to you and your website!

    Well, I hardly believe you ever read the Web site because you never commented here before.

    I also find it curious that many of those who come here with negativity are geographical neighbours of S.u.S.E (Germany).

  35. Ian said,

    December 29, 2008 at 1:39 pm

    Gravatar

    1. I’ve just been told that PJ might permanently step out of Groklaw.

    The Eagles knocked the Cowboys out of playoff contention last night too. I don’t see how either are relevant.

    At any rate, I don’t blame her. Groklaw had a focus and did a very good job at reporting on facts and deciphering much of the legal cruft for us layman. With SCO basically a smoldering heap and everything on that topic pretty much wrapped up or being tied off, I’d probably walk away too.

  36. twitter said,

    December 29, 2008 at 3:39 pm

    Gravatar

    Fake good byes are also a well known troll method.

  37. Roy Schestowitz said,

    December 29, 2008 at 3:44 pm

    Gravatar

    ZOMG!!1 *everyone* is leaving.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sockpuppet_(Internet)

    The key difference between a sockpuppet and a regular pseudonym (sometimes termed an “alt” which is short for alternate, as in alternate identity) is the pretense that the puppet is a third party who is not affiliated with the puppeteer.”

  38. Chris said,

    December 31, 2008 at 2:49 pm

    Gravatar

    Besides that the above comments show a lot about the state of this site, its “editor” and his shills, I consider it pretty funny that even your former colleagues seem to be fed up with the way you constantly bend or totally make up the truth while ignoring other parts just cause they don’t fit your argumentation.

    But hey, you just annoyed one of “the regular hecklers” who dared to point out some incorrect claims and even tried to argue with you based on facts. No wonder he got totally fed up with that mission impossible. How the hell could he dare? Good job Boy!

    Last but not least I had a good laugh when you pointed “twitter” to the sockpuppet definition. I mean, he is pretty much the inventor of sockpuppets. His trolling on slashdot is so notorious that every post about twitter (the service) has more replies talking about twitter (the troll)

    See http://slashdot.org/~SockDisclosure/journal/214377 for details.

  39. Will said,

    January 1, 2009 at 11:56 am

    Gravatar

    When he comes back, will you publish Shane’s statement about why he withdrew his support from boycottnovell.com in full length?

  40. C.J. said,

    January 5, 2009 at 6:10 pm

    Gravatar

    I can understand Shane’s frustration. I’ve tried to have rational discussions with regulars on this blog and the tendency seems to be to rally behind anyone who hates “them” and supports “us.” If anyone asks why “we” hate “them” so much, they get censored, insulted, ridiculed, etc.

    I think this site brings up some important points, but I think maybe there’s a little “aluminum hat” syndrome going on as well.

    I hope Shane’s departure has a positive effect on the blog, but I have a feeling we’re in for more of the same…

  41. Roy Schestowitz said,

    January 5, 2009 at 6:16 pm

    Gravatar

    You know I’ve always welcomed feedback. Why pretend that you can reform Microsoft’s ways and it’s only those ‘zealous’ ‘Linux people’ who can’t behave?

    Show me where I was rude to people who only come here to heckle endlessly. If I am doubtful about people who get their wage from Microsoft, who is to blame?

  42. G. Michaels said,

    January 5, 2009 at 7:11 pm

    Gravatar

    Why pretend that you can reform Microsoft’s ways

    Have you noticed you have an unfortunate tendency to invariably respond to people with the wrong questions?

    Note: writer of this comment adds absolutely nothing but stalking and personal attacks against readers, as documented here.

What Else is New


  1. Links 25/11/2014: Tizen News, Jolla Tablet Past Million

    Links for the day



  2. Links 24/11/2014: Linux 3.18-rc6, Qualcomm Eyes GNU/Linux Servers

    Links for the day



  3. Boycotting Micro Focus International

    Microsoft's "Partner of the Year" is taking over the patron of SUSE and all of Novell's remains, except the patents (Microsoft has already grabbed those)



  4. Vesna Stilin's Remarks on Željko Topić: Part XI

    Vesna Stilin speaks about her confrontation with EPO Vice-President Željko Topić, who has criminal lawsuits against him in Croatia



  5. Links 22/11/2014: Linux Mint 17.1, Ubuntu MATE

    Links for the day



  6. Links 21/11/2014: Problems at Debian, Jolla Tablet

    Links for the day



  7. Links 18/11/2014: Linux 3.18 RC 5, New DigiKam

    Links for the day



  8. Special Report: Many Criminal Charges Against EPO Vice-President Željko Topić

    The abuses of Željko Topić, who has gained notoriety in his home country, are rapidly becoming public knowledge across all of Europe



  9. Links 16/11/2014: Xfdesktop 4.10.3, GNU Hello 2.10

    Links for the day



  10. Microsoft is Going Into the Anti-Whistleblowing Business, Dodges Criticism Over 19-Year Bug Door in Windows

    With Aorato acquisition Microsoft helps protect the criminals (from whistleblowers) and with lies about .NET Microsoft distracts from a bug that has facilitated remote access into Windows (by those in the know) for nearly two decades



  11. Reaffirming Microsoft's Long-Known Hostility Towards Net Neutrality, Microsoft Crashed Juniper

    Steve Ballmer is ranting against net neutrality and Juniper's business is in trouble after a lot of executives from Microsoft took over most top positions there



  12. Another Massive Step Towards Elimination of Software Patents as Even CAFC Rules Against Them

    After SCOTUS gets involved in the Ultramercial case, the CAFC finally decides to actually serve justice rather than dogma



  13. The GOP's Patent Reform Plan Not Effective Enough to Stop Massive Patent Trolls Like Microsoft/Nokia

    The corporations-serving GOP says that it wants a patent reform, but another reminder is needed of the futility of the suggested changes



  14. How the EPO's Executive Branch (Battistelli and Topić) Banned Scrutiny and Created Authoritarian Model of Control: Part X

    A look at highly dubious moves by EPO President Battistelli and his right-hand man Topić, whose abuses are becoming hard to oversee or even report



  15. Links 15/11/2014: Linux Mint 17.1 Release Candidate, Popcorn Time 0.3.5

    Links for the day



  16. IRC Proceedings: October 26th, 2014 – November 8th, 2014

    Many IRC logs



  17. The Terrible Joke Which is Microsoft 'Loving' Linux: Nightmares With UEFI 'Secure' Boot (i.e. Windows Monopoly Imposed) Continue to Affect GNU/Linux Users

    A reminder of Microsoft's sheer hostility towards GNU/Linux and long-reaching sabotage of GNU/Linux installations



  18. Patent Lawyers Worry About Section 101 in 'Alice' (and Other Patent News)

    A quick roundup of news of interest regarding software patents



  19. Will Write for FUD (Against FOSS)

    Black Duck rears its ugly head again, serving to show that it is in the business of changing perceptions and not in the information or analysis business



  20. Debunking Several Days of Never-Ending Lies About Microsoft and .NET

    .NET is not "Open Source", it cannot be forked (there remains patent threat), Visual Studio is still completely proprietary and it is expected to come to other platforms only because Windows has lost its dominance and Microsoft wants to perpetually control APIs (with software patents) and hence reign over developers



  21. Links 14/11/2014: LibreOffice 4.3.4, Ads Now in Firefox

    Links for the day



  22. Links 14/11/2014: GNOME 3.14.2, PulseAudio 6.0

    Links for the day



  23. Microsoft Windows is Still Designed as a Paradise of Back Doors, Intrusion, Wiretaps, and Interception

    At many levels -- from communication to storage and encryption -- Windows is designed for the very opposite of security



  24. Forget the FUD About Bash and OpenSSL, Microsoft Windows Blamed for Massive Credit Cards Heist

    Home Depot learns its lesson from a Microsoft Windows disaster, but it stays with proprietary software rather than move to software that is actively audited by many people and is inherently better maintained (Free/libre software)



  25. Windows 'Update' and NSA Back Doors, Including a 19-Year Bug Door in Microsoft Windows

    The back doors-enabled Microsoft Windows is being revealed and portrayed as the Swiss cheese that it really is after massive holes are discovered (mostly to be buried by a .NET propaganda blitz)



  26. Revealed: Microsoft is Trying to Corrupt the UK in Order to Eliminate Its OpenDocument Format-Oriented Standards Policy

    Microsoft interference with Britain's preference for ODF is now confirmed, thanks to a valuable news report from Computer Weekly; OOXML lock-in is being unleashed by Microsoft on Android users



  27. Links 13/11/2014: Ubuntu MATE 14.04.1 LTS, New KDE Plasma

    Links for the day



  28. .NET is NOT "Open Source", But Microsoft's Minions Shamelessly Openwash It Right Now

    The openwashing of .NET continues with yet another publicity stunt that is intended to lock in developers



  29. Links 11/11/2014: GNOME Trademark Dispute Settled, Mozilla Embraces Tor

    Links for the day



  30. Patent Reform Subversion After Republican (GOP) 'Win' in US Senate

    The Grand Corporations Party, or the political party which serves large businesses that are funding it, continues to just focus on a mirage of a 'reform' rather than tackle the real issues where culprits include very large businesses such as Microsoft and Apple


CoPilotCo

RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

CoPilotCo

Recent Posts