EditorsAbout the SiteComes vs. MicrosoftUsing This Web SiteSite ArchivesCredibility IndexOOXMLOpenDocumentPatentsNovellNews DigestSite NewsRSS

01.07.09

Hard Week for Microsoft, Next Week Likely Harder

Posted in Finance, Microsoft, Rumour at 9:05 pm by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

Stock Dives

In what seems like a worthy punishment, Intel and Microsoft both suffered a major blow at the sight of stagnant sales.

Shares of Microsoft Corp., the world’s largest software maker, sank Wednesday after chip maker Intel Corp. said fourth-quarter sales missed already lowered expectations.

Even a music Web site has published an article about the effect of Microsoft’s sharp drop in value.

Rap veteran E-40 is reviewing his stock market options after losing money from shares in software giant Microsoft and his fast food chain Fatburger.

Had it not been for massive buybacks, Microsoft’s shares would be worth a lot less and so would the value of the company (as opposed to its cash reserves that rapidly run out [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]).

Cessation and Deflation

According to numerous reports, Microsoft has poured cold water on expansion plans.

Microsoft has put on hold any interest in further expanding its operations in Seattle because of the deteriorating economy, a spokesman said Tuesday.

Divisions Shutdown

According to this report, Microsoft will soon shut down some gaming divisions.

Reuters and other outlets have reported recently that both Microsoft and Sony will be closing some of their major gaming divisions in early 2009.

Microsoft has already shut down Ensemble Studios, as we mentioned in [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]. Since XBox360 makes a loss per sale, Microsoft is now willing to go as far as suing a bankrupt company.

Microsoft Takes Legal Action Against Woolworths In The UK

It could be called the end of an era, as Woolworths in the United Kingdom has closed it’s doors forever to the public. Amidst the announcement that Woolworths would be shutting down due to bankruptcy, there were the typical “everything must go” sales where the store was practically giving their goods away. Well everyone in the land of the Union Jack must not have got the memo, and Woolworths was left with a ton of overstock, and coincidentally some of that stock happened to be Xbox 360′s. Now Microsoft isn’t just trying to take legal action against Woolworths, or Deliotte who is the administrator of the now defunct retailer, just to crash their party.

This is also covered in:

How low have they sunk? [Clarification 08/01/09: this is in reference to Woolworths]

Layoffs

Some days ago we cited many reports of looming layoffs. There are some newer reports:

Regulation, Finally?

Another interesting report today comes from Satyam, which turns out to be a financial fraud.

Satyam Chief Quits, Admits Faking Financial Results

[...]

In a resignation letter submitted to Satyam’s board, B. Ramalinga Raju said the company’s balance sheet carries inflated bank and cash balances, non-existent accrued interest, understated liabilities, and overstated credit amounts owed to the company.

Satyam and Microsoft have a tight alliance.

It was almost 10 years ago that Bill Parish wrote: “Microsoft’s perspective is best reflected by Bob Herbold, Chief Operating Officer, to whom the CFO reports. Bob very sincerely replied, “Bill, everyone is doing it.” My response was that Microsoft is a leader and that others are now seeking to emulate these fraudulent practices they have legitimized. Naturally Bob was not pleased by this perspective and that was our final conversation.”

It was around the same time that someone from inside Microsoft had already blown the whistle to highlight financial fraud [1, 2].

Nervous lady

Share this post: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • co.mments
  • DZone
  • email
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • NewsVine
  • Print
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Facebook

If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

Pages that cross-reference this one

46 Comments

  1. AlexH said,

    January 8, 2009 at 3:20 am

    Gravatar

    JFYI, suing a “bankrupt company” (actually, one that’s in administration – there’s a difference) is extremely common, for pretty obvious reasons.

  2. Roy Schestowitz said,

    January 8, 2009 at 3:42 am

    Gravatar

    Merciless nonetheless. There is a similar story about their bank.

  3. AlexH said,

    January 8, 2009 at 4:29 am

    Gravatar

    How on earth is it merciless? The business is being wound up!

  4. Roy Schestowitz said,

    January 8, 2009 at 4:42 am

    Gravatar

    And Microsoft behaves like a vulture, lurking for victims to peck at.

  5. AlexH said,

    January 8, 2009 at 4:46 am

    Gravatar

    Hang on. Microsoft are the ones owed millions, but EUK is the victim? How does that logic work?!

  6. Roy Schestowitz said,

    January 8, 2009 at 4:56 am

    Gravatar

    I doubt they can pay back. Should Red Hat also sue SCO for a frivolous lawsuit?

  7. AlexH said,

    January 8, 2009 at 5:04 am

    Gravatar

    Er, they’re not suing them for money, Roy.

  8. Roy Schestowitz said,

    January 8, 2009 at 5:17 am

    Gravatar

    Yes, of course.

  9. AlexH said,

    January 8, 2009 at 5:26 am

    Gravatar

    So what’s the actual problem?

  10. Roy Schestowitz said,

    January 8, 2009 at 5:30 am

    Gravatar

    It’s like this incident. It shows weakness.

  11. AlexH said,

    January 8, 2009 at 5:32 am

    Gravatar

    You think any other business which had millions of pounds of stock in someone else’s hands wouldn’t take legal action to get it back?

    I think you’re confusing weakness with basic business sense…

  12. Roy Schestowitz said,

    January 8, 2009 at 5:45 am

    Gravatar

    Although it’s a stretch, one could argue that Microsoft just wants lots of XBox360s out there, just as it wants lots of (counterfeited) Windows and Office out there. it’s production costs that make a difference though.

  13. AlexH said,

    January 8, 2009 at 5:52 am

    Gravatar

    Well, it obviously wants lots of Xbox360s out there – I’m not sure how that’s relevant though? The stock already exists, MS sent it to EUK and didn’t get paid for it. Now they want it back.

    Microsoft do tonnes of stuff worth criticising, but I just don’t see how this is anything different than normal business practice…

  14. Roy Schestowitz said,

    January 8, 2009 at 6:01 am

    Gravatar

    This was not the main criticism in this post, but you latched onto it. Reread the post to see things in context (it was about shutdown on XBox/gaming divisions)

  15. AlexH said,

    January 8, 2009 at 6:11 am

    Gravatar

    Well, most of the rest is just opinion/speculation.

    This is what I find difficult: sometimes, you justly criticise Microsoft for things they’ve done wrong. But othertimes, you criticise them when they’re doing things anyone else would do (this example, the CSS example, etc. etc.). Often, you criticise them for doing things that others are doing (e.g., the continual illogic about stock buy-backs).

    It makes it impossible to separate the valid criticism from the made-up “it’s bad because Microsoft are doing it”. We’re to believe that Microsoft have “sunk low” because they’re trying to recover debts? Give me a break.

  16. Roy Schestowitz said,

    January 8, 2009 at 6:29 am

    Gravatar

    That was Woolworths, not Microsoft.

  17. AlexH said,

    January 8, 2009 at 6:36 am

    Gravatar

    What was Woolworths?

  18. Roy Schestowitz said,

    January 8, 2009 at 6:43 am

    Gravatar

    Sinking.

  19. AlexH said,

    January 8, 2009 at 6:51 am

    Gravatar

    Perhaps you ought to correct the article then, because you’re talking about Microsoft and switch to Woolworths without noting it.

  20. Roy Schestowitz said,

    January 8, 2009 at 6:53 am

    Gravatar

    I’ve added the word “Woolworths”.

  21. AlexH said,

    January 8, 2009 at 6:55 am

    Gravatar

    Given you already called them “bankrupt” (which they’re not), why do we care how low Woolworths have sunk? Can you get any lower?

  22. Roy Schestowitz said,

    January 8, 2009 at 7:01 am

    Gravatar

    “Amidst the announcement that Woolworths would be shutting down due to bankruptcy,”

    http://www.talkxbox.com/article2981.html

    I cited it.

  23. AlexH said,

    January 8, 2009 at 7:03 am

    Gravatar

    “Bankrupt” is past tense. Woolworths are currently in adminstration.

    And anyway, it’s not Woolworths, it’s EUK, who are still trading and probably won’t go bankrupt (particularly since they’re part owned by the BBC).

  24. Roy Schestowitz said,

    January 8, 2009 at 7:06 am

    Gravatar

    Good for them.

  25. AlexH said,

    January 8, 2009 at 7:07 am

    Gravatar

    Bravo on rewriting it in ambiguous fashion again, anyway.

  26. Roy Schestowitz said,

    January 8, 2009 at 7:12 am

    Gravatar

    it wasn’t intended to be ambiguous.

  27. AlexH said,

    January 8, 2009 at 7:13 am

    Gravatar

    The simpler fix would be to cross out “they” and put “Woolworths”.

  28. Roy Schestowitz said,

    January 8, 2009 at 7:18 am

    Gravatar

    I didn’t want to use strikeout but rather just to clarify.

    Do you really have nothing better to comment on? I’ve posted some interesting things, but nitpicking appeals to you much more.

  29. AlexH said,

    January 8, 2009 at 7:28 am

    Gravatar

    No, it’s not the nitpicking, it’s watching the revisionism in action – how far you’ll bend to not admit a mistake.

  30. Roy Schestowitz said,

    January 8, 2009 at 7:34 am

    Gravatar

    If you are a perfectionist, use an encyclopedia or contribute to Wikipedia. If my source says that “…Amidst the announcement that Woolworths would be shutting down due to bankruptcy,” then I am allowed to innocently propagate an error every now and then.

    I write many posts here. Precision is hard when some of the articles from Google News are erroneous.

    If you have a nitpicking hobby, start a(nother) blog and express your point of view.

  31. AlexH said,

    January 8, 2009 at 7:35 am

    Gravatar

    You’re missing out the main point, which isn’t about your mistakes. It’s the made-up criticism that’s the big problem.

  32. Roy Schestowitz said,

    January 8, 2009 at 8:06 am

    Gravatar

    Of who? Woolworths? There is no criticism there; this part is pointing out that XBox360 is failing.

  33. AlexH said,

    January 8, 2009 at 8:16 am

    Gravatar

    The XBox360 isn’t failing in anyone’s eyes except yours, because you still repeat the “loss on every sale” meme, which as has been pointed out isn’t true any more.

    But I articulated my point many comments ago: you criticise Microsoft for many things. Some of them are entirely justifiable, and deserve wider notice. But then you pepper it with nonsense about CSS vendor extensions or (in this case) claiming back their own property, and start calling them names.

    By making bad points you drown out the good ones.

  34. Roy Schestowitz said,

    January 8, 2009 at 8:27 am

    Gravatar

    Ballmer himself calls XBox a “funny product” because they’ve lost billions on it. How do you define success? Number of adverts?

    The only winner is Nintendo, which Microsoft prefers to pretend does not exist.

  35. AlexH said,

    January 8, 2009 at 8:35 am

    Gravatar

    Not being #1 doesn’t make it unsuccessful. Having a huge installed base, a lot of subscribers, and a profitable business counts as “success” (and they are profitable now).

    You write Microsoft off at your peril. Seriously.

  36. Roy Schestowitz said,

    January 8, 2009 at 8:39 am

    Gravatar

    They are not profitable. They have lost about $7 billion. They are at the point now where they no longer lose even more money (that’s what they claim anyway), but it doesn’t make them “profitable”.

  37. AlexH said,

    January 8, 2009 at 8:50 am

    Gravatar

    Actually, it does. Profitability is over a financial period, not the entire lifetime of any given product. By your logic, Windows will be a profitable product basically forever.

  38. Roy Schestowitz said,

    January 8, 2009 at 8:54 am

    Gravatar

    You are attempting to spin this.

    Let me simplify this. Let us say that Microsoft’s balance-sheet for XBox looks like this:

    2000: -$1,000,000
    2001: -$1,500,000
    2002: -$1,400,000
    2003: -$2,000,000
    2004: -$2,000,000
    2005: -$2,500,000
    2006: -$4,000,000
    2007: -$7,500,000
    2008: -$7,200,000
    2009: ?? (2009 depression)

    Does that look like a successful and profitable business?

  39. AlexH said,

    January 8, 2009 at 8:56 am

    Gravatar

    As I just said, the concept of profitability is not a cumulative one for obvious reasons. No-one measures it like that.

    Call it spin if you like; it’s actually Finance 101. Go read how actual accountants do this, Roy.

  40. Roy Schestowitz said,

    January 8, 2009 at 9:07 am

    Gravatar

    ‘Pedancy’ with literal meanings does not change the fact it is a piker from a financial perspective,

  41. AlexH said,

    January 8, 2009 at 9:15 am

    Gravatar

    It’s not pedancy, Roy. You can’t redefine “profitability” to your own term just because it suits your argument.

    This is a classic example of what I’m saying. Microsoft (and, to a lesser extent, Sony) have massively subsidized their entry into this market. That’s fair enough criticism.

    But then you over-egg the pudding by basically padding it with fabrication. You repeat old memes which are no longer true, and meddle around with words.

  42. Roy Schestowitz said,

    January 8, 2009 at 9:17 am

    Gravatar

    Which memes? Be specific, please. Subsidy of entry does not mean that a product will not generate a loss throughout its lifetime.

  43. Dan O'Brian said,

    January 8, 2009 at 9:32 am

    Gravatar

    Roy: go out and get some real-world experience, please, before you further humiliate yourself.

    Actually, on second thought, it’s more funny if you don’t.

  44. Roy Schestowitz said,

    January 8, 2009 at 9:34 am

    Gravatar

    Dan,

    Your message lacks content.

  45. AlexH said,

    January 8, 2009 at 9:43 am

    Gravatar

    I’m sure he can make something up if you give him a few minutes.

  46. Dan O'Brian said,

    January 8, 2009 at 10:19 am

    Gravatar

    His faulty intepretation of the “Linux Heat Map” is a great example. His lack of understanding in this article is yet another.

    The list is endless.

What Else is New


  1. Links 24/4/2018: Preview of Crostini, Introducing Heptio Gimbal, OPNsense 18.1.6

    Links for the day



  2. Patent Maximalists Step Things Up With Director Andrei Iancu and It's Time for Scientists to Fight Back

    Science and technology don't seem to matter as much as the whims of the patent (litigation) 'industry', at least judging by recent actions taken by Andrei Iancu (following a hearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee)



  3. Mythology About Patents in the East

    Misconceptions (or deliberate propaganda) about patent policy in the east poison the debate and derail a serious, facts-based discussion about it



  4. Patent Trolls Watch: Red River Innovations, Bradium Technologies/General Patent, and Wordlogic

    A quick look at some patent trolls that made the news this Monday; we are still seeing a powerful response to such trolls, whose momentum is slipping owing to the good work of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB)



  5. Holding Benoît Battistelli Accountable After the EPO

    The many abuses and offenses committed by Mr. Battistelli whilst he enjoyed diplomatic immunity can and should be brought up as that immunity expires in two months; a good start would be contacting his colleagues, who might not be aware of the full spectrum of his abuses



  6. Links 23/4/2018: Second RC of Linux 4.17 and First RC of Mesa 18.1

    Links for the day



  7. The Good Work of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) and the Latest Attempts to Undermine It

    A week's roundup of news about PTAB, which is eliminating many bad (wrongly-granted) patents and is therefore becoming "enemy number one" to those who got accustomed to blackmailing real (productive) firms with their questionable patents



  8. District Courts' Patent Cases, Including the Eastern District of Texas (EDTX/TXED), in a Nutshell

    A roundup of patent cases in 'low courts' of the United States, where patents are being reasoned about or objected to while patent law firms make a lot of money



  9. The Federal Circuit's (CAFC) Decisions Are Being Twisted by Patent Propaganda Sites Which Merely Cherry-Pick Cases With Outcomes That Suit Them

    The Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) continues to reject the vast majority of software patents, citing Section 101 in many such cases, but the likes of Managing IP, Patently-O, IAM and Watchtroll only selectively cover such cases (instead they’re ‘pulling a Berkheimer’ or some similar name-dropping)



  10. Patents Roundup: Metaswitch, GENBAND, Susman, Cisco, Konami, High 5 Games, HTC, and Nintendo

    A look at existing legal actions, the application of 35 U.S.C. § 101, and questionable patents that are being pursued on software (algorithms or "software infrastructure")



  11. In Maxon v Funai the High 'Patent Court' (CAFC) Reaffirms Disdain for Software Patents, Which Are Nowadays Harder to Get and Then Defend

    With the wealth of decisions from the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) wherein software patents get discarded (Funai being the latest example), the public needs to ask itself whether patent law firms are honest when they make claims about resurgence of software patents by 'pulling a Berkheimer' or coming up with terms like “Berkheimer Effect”



  12. Today's European Patent Office Works for Patent Extremists and for Team UPC Rather Than for Europe or for Innovation

    The International Association for the Protection of Intellectual Property (AIPPI) and other patent maximalists who have nothing to do with Europe, helped by a malicious and rather clueless politician called Benoît Battistelli, are turning the EPO into a patent-printing machine rather than an examination office as envisioned by the EPC (founders) and member states



  13. The EPO is Dying and Those Who Have Killed It Are Becoming Very Rich in the Process

    Following the footsteps of Ron Hovsepian at Novell, Battistelli at the EPO (along with Team Battistelli) may mean the end of the EPO as we know it (or the end altogether); one manager and a cabal of confidants make themselves obscenely rich by basically sacrificing the very organisation they were entrusted to serve



  14. Short: Just Keep Repeating the Lie (“Quality”) Until People Might Believe It

    Battistelli’s patent-printing bureau (EPO without quality control) keeps lying about the quality of patents by repeating the word “quality” a lot of times, including no less than twice in the summary alone



  15. Shelston IP Keeps Pressuring IP Australia to Allow Software Patents and Harm Software Development

    Shelston IP wants exactly the opposite of what's good for Australia; it just wants what's good for itself, yet it habitually pretends to speak for a productive industry (nothing could be further from the truth)



  16. Is Andy Ramer's Departure the End of Cantor Fitzgerald's Patent Trolls-Feeding Operations and Ambitions?

    The managing director of the 'IP' group at Cantor Fitzgerald is leaving, but it does not yet mean that patent trolls will be starved/deprived access to patents



  17. EPO Hoards Billions of Euros (Taken From the Public), Decreases Quality to Get More Money, Reduces Payments to Staff

    The EPO continues to collect money from everyone, distributes bogus/dubious patents that usher patent trolls into Europe (to cost European businesses billions in the long run), and staff of the EPO faces more cuts while EPO management swims in cash and perks



  18. Short: Calling Battistelli's Town (Where He Works) “Force for Innovation” to Justify the Funneling of EPO Funds to It

    How the EPO‘s management ‘explained’ (or sought to rationalise) to staff its opaque decision to send a multi-million, one-day ceremony to Battistelli’s own theatre only weeks before he leaves



  19. Short: EPO Bribes the Media and Then Brags About the Paid-for Outcome to Staff

    The EPO‘s systematic corruption of the media at the expense of EPO stakeholders — not to mention hiring of lawyers to bully media which exposes EPO corruption — in the EPO’s own words (amended by us)



  20. Short: EPO's “Working Party for Quality” is to Quality What the “Democratic People's Republic of Korea” is to Democracy

    To maintain the perception (illusion) that the EPO still cares about patent quality — and in order to disseminate this lie to EPO staff — a puff piece with the above heading/photograph was distributed to thousands of examiners in glossy paper form



  21. Short: This Spring's Message From the EPO's President (Corrected)

    A corrected preface from the Liar in Chief, the EPO's notoriously crooked and dishonest President



  22. Short: Highly Misleading and Unscientific Graphics From the EPO for an Illusion of Growth

    A look at the brainwash that EPO management is distributing to staff and what's wrong with it



  23. Short: EPO Explains to Examiners Why They Should and Apparently Can Grant Software Patents (in Spite of EPC)

    Whether it calls it "CII" or "ICT" or "Industry 4.0" or "4IR", the EPO's management continues to grant software patents and attempts to justify this to itself (and to staff)



  24. Links 21/4/2018: Linux 4.9.95, FFmpeg 4.0, OpenBSD Foundation 2018 Fundraising Campaign

    Links for the day



  25. As USPTO Director, Andrei Iancu Gives Three Months for Public Comments on 35 U.S.C. § 101 (Software Patenting Impacted)

    Weeks after starting his job as head of the US patent office, to our regret but not to our surprise, Iancu asks whether to limit examiners' ability to reject abstract patent applications citing 35 U.S.C. § 101 (relates to Alice and Mayo)



  26. In Keith Raniere v Microsoft Both Sides Are Evil But for Different Reasons

    Billing for patent lawyers reveals an abusive strategy from Microsoft, which responded to abusive patent litigation (something which Microsoft too has done for well over a decade)



  27. Links 20/4/2018: Atom 1.26, MySQL 8.0

    Links for the day



  28. Links 19/4/2018: Mesa 17.3.9 and 18.0.1, Trisquel 8.0 LTS Flidas, Elections for openSUSE Board

    Links for the day



  29. The Patent Microcosm, Patent Trolls and Their Pressure Groups Incite a USPTO Director Against the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) and Section 101/Alice

    As one might expect, the patent extremists continue their witch-hunt and constant manipulation of USPTO officials, whom they hope to compel to become patent extremists themselves (otherwise those officials are defamed, typically until they're fired or decide to resign)



  30. Microsoft's Lobbying for FRAND Pays Off as Microsoft-Connected Patent Troll Conversant (Formerly MOSAID) Goes After Android OEMs in Europe

    The FRAND (or SEP) lobby seems to have caused a lot of monopolistic patent lawsuits; this mostly affects Linux-powered platforms such as Android, Tizen and webOS and there are new legal actions from Microsoft-connected patent trolls


CoPilotCo

RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

CoPilotCo

Recent Posts