EditorsAbout the SiteComes vs. MicrosoftUsing This Web SiteSite ArchivesCredibility IndexOOXMLOpenDocumentPatentsNovellNews DigestSite NewsRSS

01.09.09

Novell is Heckling Boycott Novell, Anonymously

Posted in Boycott Novell, Novell, Site News at 6:39 pm by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

Clowns

THE suspicion that Novell employees are harassing Boycott Novell (and other Web sites that occasionally write about Novell for that matter) is no suspicion but a fact. They want good publicity and in the lack of good publicity they’ll attack the messenger, be it the carrier of a negative message about Mono or whatever.

To produce proof, one need not go far, either. Take pseudonym “Baby In The Bath Water” for example. He has posted dozens of comments here since last year. What comments? Critical — if not abusive — comments.

According to one comment, this person is “involved” with “IETF draft specifications” and he spends a lot of time here promoting/defending Mono, as well as other Novell products.

He posted each and every one of these comment from 130.57.22.201, which belongs to:



OrgName:    Novell, Inc. 
OrgID:      NOVELL-1
Address:    1800 South Novell Place
City:       Provo
StateProv:  UT
PostalCode: 84606
Country:    US

NetRange:   130.57.0.0 - 130.57.255.255 
CIDR:       130.57.0.0/16 
NetName:    NOVELL-WEST
NetHandle:  NET-130-57-0-0-1
Parent:     NET-130-0-0-0-0
NetType:    Direct Assignment
NameServer: NS.NOVELL.COM
NameServer: NS2.NOVELL.COM
Comment:    
RegDate:    1988-06-03
Updated:    2004-05-05

RAbuseHandle: BWA3-ARIN
RAbuseName:   Wayne, Bruce 
RAbusePhone:  +1-801-861-2222
RAbuseEmail:  bwayne@novell.com 

RNOCHandle: BWA3-ARIN
RNOCName:   Wayne, Bruce 
RNOCPhone:  +1-801-861-2222
RNOCEmail:  bwayne@novell.com 

RTechHandle: BWA3-ARIN
RTechName:   Wayne, Bruce 
RTechPhone:  +1-801-861-2222
RTechEmail:  bwayne@novell.com 

OrgTechHandle: DNJ4-ARIN
OrgTechName:   Johnson, David N.
OrgTechPhone:  +1-801-861-2561
OrgTechEmail:  dnjohnson@novell.com

# ARIN WHOIS database, last updated 2009-01-08 19:10
# Enter ? for additional hints on searching ARIN's WHOIS database.


We also get a lot of harassment from IP addresses in the vicinity of S.u.S.E. (Germany). Coincidence or mischief? Or maybe the posters just happen to have cracked and hijacked machines in Novell’s headquarters, in order to access Boycott Novell. [sarcasm /]

Anyhoo…

If it were not for the harassment, it would be harder to argue that Novell seems a little paranoid, maybe because the Netcraft (traffic) rank for this site is 2892nd on the Web (and rising steadily).

Novell loves arguing that we offer no honesty; but what type of example does Novell set when its employees post here under names like “Baby In The Bath Water”?

“The true hypocrite is the one who ceases to perceive his deception, the one who lies with sincerity.”

Andre Gide

Share this post: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • co.mments
  • DZone
  • email
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • NewsVine
  • Print
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Facebook

If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

Pages that cross-reference this one

20 Comments

  1. C.J. said,

    January 9, 2009 at 8:04 pm

    Gravatar

    http://frontalot.com/index.php/?page=lyrics&lyricid=45

    *heckle* *heckle*

  2. Roy Schestowitz said,

    January 9, 2009 at 8:10 pm

    Gravatar

    Yet you can’t look away and you went on a campaign to discredit us.

    Are you still contracted for that consulting gig for Microsoft Corporation, C.J.? I hear they are cutting down on contracted staff.

  3. Ed Landaveri said,

    January 9, 2009 at 11:19 pm

    Gravatar

    So many mono defenders, where did you think they come from? This was clear from the beginning. If somebody doesn’t like any site. Simple do not look at it. If they see any merit on mono why they do not create they’re own blogs to spread its wonders. They know that they would get no traffic figures thus, these Novell servants come and try ludicrously to defend what Novell have done: “To get in bed with Microsoft!”

    If mono “has” any merit, what good it does to Free Open Source. None! it only benefits those who are being paid by Microsoft who is and will try to destroy Linux and FOSS. Remember they are scared by freedom and the fact that people everywhere in the world are waking up to know what Microsoft know for so many years that GNU Linux and FOSS are technically superior.

    Meanwhile, please keep up the good work to stand up for freedom! To stand up against Colonialism! Hats off to you && Happy New Year! Your site is one of the lighthouses for the free world!

  4. Shane Coyle said,

    January 9, 2009 at 11:41 pm

    Gravatar

    I’ve been considering making ALL comments come up anonymous, so that they may each be judged on the merits of their content, rather than whomever spoke them and any perceived agendas they may have.

    Even if it is Ron Hovsepian commenting here, who cares? Just like, for all everyone knows, I’m really twitter. As long as you can defeat my arguments and assertions, it really shouldn’t matter what my motivations and associations are perceived to be.

    In fact, it is conducive to healthy discourse to ensure that there are intelligent people whom you respect from all sides of an issue participating – something that I’ve always hoped for on this site, and we have a fairly diverse and knowledgeable community of regulars here, let’s not keep chasing them away.

    Note: writer of this comment wants to look cool by having one of those ominous-looking disclaimer texts.

  5. Peter2 said,

    January 10, 2009 at 3:48 am

    Gravatar

    Your astounding method as harrasing commenters that do not agree with you is incredible.
    I can see why people would only want to be anonymous here. Before you now it you publish their personal details in your articles.

    You show extremly obsessive behaviour towards people that do not agree with you. That is unwise because a lot of your articles are so outrageous that most people are bound to disagree even from the FOSS community.

  6. Roy Schestowitz said,

    January 10, 2009 at 4:12 am

    Gravatar

    If defence of Mono comes from people with vested interests, should we not know?

  7. AlexH said,

    January 10, 2009 at 4:17 am

    Gravatar

    @Roy: if you bash a project, it’s natural that those that first protest to the bashing are those in the free software community who spend their (often free) time working on the project.

    After all, there are vested interests working against Mono on this site.

  8. Roy Schestowitz said,

    January 10, 2009 at 4:19 am

    Gravatar

    Really? How so?

  9. AlexH said,

    January 10, 2009 at 5:04 am

    Gravatar

    Well, inability to accept clear facts about the project and to continue to deny its status as free software is obviously a vested interested. Like denying global warming; they are often connected to oil interests.

  10. Kevin Vacit said,

    January 10, 2009 at 5:14 am

    Gravatar

    Roy, do you have any indication this is a coordinated attack? Strictly speaking it might simply be a disgruntled Novell employee venting his private opinions.

  11. Roy Schestowitz said,

    January 10, 2009 at 5:26 am

    Gravatar

    Companies comprise people. Policies don’t come from a crystal ball and companies take responsibility for what they — their staff — do at work.

  12. towanowitsch said,

    January 10, 2009 at 6:39 am

    Gravatar

    Thank you, Shane.

  13. the11thplague said,

    January 10, 2009 at 7:22 pm

    Gravatar

    Lol, this is like a battle between you and anybody who posts. Maybe it’s just a battle of yours, maybe it’s a war on you. Anyway, it’s really fun to see. :)

  14. G. Michaels said,

    January 11, 2009 at 12:43 am

    Gravatar

    Roy – I’m sure everyone is waiting breathlessly for you to actually come up with some proof that this is some sort of concerted effort on the part of your most hated corporation. I know I am!

    If this is the extent of the “attacks” you claim you’ve been a victim of, it sure looks rather lame-ish (what with an IP that can easily be identified) and it sure took them their sweet long time to start it up, didn’t it?

    You’re like the kid who poked the beehive one too many times, and then acts all surprised when the bees sting him.

    But it’s probably your belief that anyone who works at Novell or Microsoft is an amoral monster, so one employee calling you on your lies and misrepresentations has to be a corporate-sponsored attack.

    Note: writer of this comment adds absolutely nothing but stalking and personal attacks against readers, as documented here.

  15. G. Michaels said,

    January 11, 2009 at 12:46 am

    Gravatar

    Oh and,

    Companies comprise people. Policies don’t come from a crystal ball and companies take responsibility for what they — their staff — do at work.

    Is this a policy at your company as well? At mine, the employee agreement that allows me to use the company’s internet connection explicitly says I’m responsible for my actions while using said internet connection.

    What does your employee agreement say, Roy? Can you share, just generalities about it? Standard disclaimers and so on, a synthesis of the legalese, please?

    Note: writer of this comment adds absolutely nothing but stalking and personal attacks against readers, as documented here.

  16. Old Novell Employee said,

    January 20, 2009 at 6:43 pm

    Gravatar

    As a past Novell employee I was told to post to these sites in defense of Novell and it was driven by my boss at then Novell. Yes you are correct in saying it is a dictate to employees at Novell by management to act this way.

  17. Jose_X said,

    January 20, 2009 at 9:42 pm

    Gravatar

    [AlexH] >> Well, inability to accept clear facts about the project and to continue to deny its status as free software is obviously a vested interested.

    On free software:

    Being free software is not a magic ticket. It never has been, though in the past, when Microsoft was not involved and when patents were used less, free software was a safer concept.

    Free software can be a tool used to help sustain a monopoly. That is how I view mono and certain other free software.

    [Peter2] >> That is unwise because a lot of your articles are so outrageous that most people are bound to disagree even from the FOSS community.

    What do you mean by “a lot”? For example, in Roy’s last 100 postings, could you point out to this “lot” so we can better see?

  18. tak said,

    January 21, 2009 at 1:44 am

    Gravatar

    Yo, I come from Germany. I guess this makes me automatically someone ‘near the SUSE headquarters’ and suspicious of working for Novell. Swell. :p

    If I move to France is this far enough from SUSE headquarters?

  19. Roy Schestowitz said,

    January 21, 2009 at 5:51 am

    Gravatar

    I assume the comment from “Old Novell Employee” was tongue-in-cheek.

  20. twitter said,

    February 18, 2009 at 10:02 am

    Gravatar

    It is a good idea to expose Novell for astroturfing, to record the crime and judge the criminals. Regulars to the site know that a significant amount of effort is spent harassing Roy through comments, significant enough to be a professional effort. The use of botnets makes it possible for PR firms to hide the origin of their work, but any evidence that can be collected should be. Shareholders, customers and fellow Novell employees deserve to know how the company is wasting their money. The rest of the world should know how reliable various comments are by the pattern of posts. Reputations are earned things and are a good resource when used properly.

    It is ironic that one of the sites’s former editors would not see the truth of the above arguments. One of the goals of the astroturfers is to ruin the credibility of the site and the reputation of its participants. You can see this in their constant complaints about inconsequential factual errors and continuous namecalling and other personal attacks against Roy. Finally, Shane, you must be aware of childish smear sites, such as linux idiots, that have been set up to attack Roy personally. Do not confuse Roy attempts to unmask organized attacks with the libel that has been dumped on Roy, Boycott Novell and people like me.

What Else is New


  1. Links 27/7/2014: KDE 4.14 Beta 3, KDE 4.14 Beta 3 Released

    Links for the day



  2. Apple and Microsoft Are Proprietary Software Companies and the Media Should Stop Openwashing Them

    New examples where proprietary software giants are characterised as FOSS-embracing and FOSS-friendly by gullible or dishonest 'journalists'



  3. Bloomberg's Microsoft Propaganda

    Bloomberg delivers 'damage control' and PR ahead of the layoffs announcement; Microsoft uses Nokia to hide it and Bloomberg helps Microsoft by radically modifying headlines



  4. Frequency of Browser Back Doors in Microsoft Windows is Doubling

    The vulnerabilities which Microsoft tells the NSA about (before these are patched) are significantly growing in terms of their numbers



  5. FUD Entities Entering the FOSS World

    Symantec enters the AllSeen Alliance and Sonatype is once again trying to claim great insecurity in FOSS due to software licensing



  6. Groklaw Back in the Wake of ODF in the UK?





  7. Links 26/7/2014: New Wine, Chromebooks Strong Sales

    Links for the day



  8. Links 25/7/2014: GOG With GNU/Linux, Ubuntu 14.04.1 LTS

    Links for the day



  9. Links 24/7/2014: Oracle Linux 7; Fedora Delays

    Links for the day



  10. Valerie Strauss Explains Why Gates Foundation's Lobbying for 'Common Core' (Privatisation) is a Swindle That Makes Microsoft Richer

    Continued criticism of the Gates Foundation's lobbying and masquerading, with more journalists brave enough to highlight the corruption



  11. USPTO Officially Sets New Guidelines to Limit Scope of Software Patents in the United States

    Even patent lawyers finally acknowledge that the incentive to file software patent applications has been reduced, as the scope of patents on software has been noticeably narrowed and they are harder to acquire, let alone enforce in a courtroom



  12. UK Government Adopts OpenDocument Format (ODF) and Microsoft Already Attacks the Government Over It, Showing Absolutely No Commitment to Open Standards

    Only "Microsoft as the standard" is the 'standard' Microsoft is willing to accept, as its response to the Cabinet Office's judgment reveals



  13. Microsoft Layoffs of 2014

    Another quick look at Microsoft's horrible state of affairs and why it has virtually nothing to do with Nokia



  14. Links 22/7/2014: Linux 3.16 RC 6, New UberStudent

    Links for the day



  15. Links 20/7/2014: Jolla in India, Mega Censored in Italy

    Links for the day



  16. Longtime Mono Booster Joins Microsoft-linked Xamarin

    Jo Shields almost joins Microsoft, settling instead for its proxy, Xamarin



  17. Linux Foundation Welcomes Patent Aggressor Red Bend Software

    The Linux Foundation's AllSeen Alliance welcomes as a member a company that uses software patents to sue Free/Open Source software



  18. Matt Levy From Patent Progress (and CCIA) Does Not Really Want Patent Progress

    Matthew ('Matt') Levy moved into a foe of patent progress last year, but he still runs a site calls Patent Progress, in which he diverts all attention to patent trolls (as large corporations such as Microsoft like to do)



  19. Attacking FOSS by Ignoring/Overlooking Issues With Proprietary Software

    The biasing strategy which continues to be used to demonise Free/Open Source software (FOSS) along with some new examples



  20. Links 19/7/2014: CRUX 3.1 is Out, CyanogenMod Competes With Google Now

    Links for the day



  21. Microsoft's Massive Layoffs Go Far Beyond Nokia; Nokia's Android Phones Axed by Microsoft's Elop

    Microsoft's rapid demise and permanent exit from Nokia's last remaining Linux platform (after Microsoft had killed two more)



  22. Patents on Software Already Being Invalidated in Courts Owing to SCOTUS Ruling on 'Abstract' Patents

    The Federal Circuit Appeals Court has just "invalidated a software patent for being overly abstract," says a patents expert



  23. OpenSUSE 'Community' is Crumbling, AttachMSFT Killed SUSE's Potential (Except as Microsoft Tax)

    Not much too see in the land of SUSE and Attachmate, or formerly the company known as Novell



  24. Links 18/7/2014: Slackware Turns 21, Spotify Switches to Ubuntu

    Links for the day



  25. Links 16/7/2014: Manjaro 0.8.10 Third Update, SIA Migrates to Red Hat

    Links for the day



  26. Microsoft's Latest Round of Massive/Bulk/Large-scale Layoffs

    Microsoft boosters are preparing 'damage control' pieces ahead of massive layoffs at Microsoft



  27. Secrecy Allows British Government to be Manipulated by Microsoft for Spyware Behind Closed Doors

    Dependence on malicious software from NSA ally Microsoft is highly dependent, at least in Britain, on government secrecy and vain refusal to comply with Freedom of Information (FOI) requests



  28. Software Patent Applications Already Being Rejected in the US Owing to SCOTUS Ruling, Some Patent Lawyers Are Fuming

    Good news on the software patents front as the USPTO starts rejecting software patent applications, based on patent lawyers' words



  29. Links 15/7/2014: New Plasma, Google Announces Project Zero

    Links for the day



  30. Interest in Free Software Coverage and 9 Months With Tux Machines

    Thoughts about the level of interest in Free/Open Source software (FOSS) and growth of at least some sites that focus on GNU/Linux


CoPilotCo

RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

CoPilotCo

Recent Posts