EditorsAbout the SiteComes vs. MicrosoftUsing This Web SiteSite ArchivesCredibility IndexOOXMLOpenDocumentPatentsNovellNews DigestSite NewsRSS

05.09.09

Who Covers Mono Again? Microsoft.

Posted in Microsoft, Mono, Novell at 4:48 am by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

Mono Microsoft brain

Summary: If Microsoft covers Mono, then it must be good for Microsoft

SOME of Microsoft’s own magazines are suffering from redundancies right now. This is a simple fact.

As we argued and showed earlier this week, Novell/Microsoft software mostly receives coverage from the Microsoft and Novell crowd [1, 2, 3]. This is definitely expected for Microsoft Moonlight, but here we see it happening for Mono as well, despite the fact that Microsoft evangelist Robert Scoble once wrote: “I saw that internally inside Microsoft many times when I was told to stay away from supporting Mono in public.”

We still keep track of Mono coverage and we are not selective about it. Therefore, the following new ZDNet review of Mono 2.2 seems a little conspicuous. It seems a little misplaced. At the bottom, however, it clearly states:

Disclosure of industry affiliations: Justin James has a working arrangement with Microsoft to write an article for MSDN Magazine. He also has a contract with Spiceworks to write product buying guides. He is an employee of Levit & James, Inc. in a multi-disciplinary role that combines programming, network management, and systems administration and has been blogging at TechRepublic since 2005.

MSDN Magazine has just been hit by large-scale layoffs, so there will likely be an outpouring of Microsoft employee/writers who spread the company’s message outside literature which is explicitly and directly associated with the company. Another TechRepublic writer was criticised last year for promoting Mono as though it was everything there is to GNU/Linux. Microsoft’s internal evangelism presentations shed light on how the company intends to control developer and trade magazines, so it’s certainly something to watch out for.

Mono is trouble because, to quote further from Robert Scoble, Microsoft reserves the right to sue over Mono. Fortunately, however, Mono relief is still being offered to more GNOME users who embrace Gnote. It’s not an ultimate solution, but it’s a start. With Richard Stallman’s suggestion, I’ve invited Hubert to align his project with GNU.

Share this post: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • co.mments
  • DZone
  • email
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • NewsVine
  • Print
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Facebook

If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

Pages that cross-reference this one

3 Comments

  1. Justin James said,

    May 9, 2009 at 10:10 am

    Gravatar

    Wow, I am truly stunned by your absolute ignorance. Let’s review a few actual facts here, as opposed to your factless ranting:

    1. The “other TechRepublic writer” you supposedly taught a lesson to previously was myself. You are unable to check a byline, apparently. I would have thought that the nearly identical bios on the article would have been a clue, but clearly it is irrelevant to someone at your level of fanaticism.

    2. I have never worked at MSDN Magazine. I have never worked for Microsoft. In fact, despite “being under contract to write an article for MSDN Magazine”, I have never seen a cent from them. Let me tell you what happened. A little more than a year ago, I made a pitch to them for a story. We worked back and forth until we settled on a story idea. I write it up, sent it in. Throughout the editing process, a number of questions came up about whether or not the article was a good fit for the magazine. At the “eleventh hour”, *I* made the decision to kill the article, despite the fact that i had invested a good portion of my time into writing it, and I had expected to use the money from it to offset a signficant portion of the cost of my (at the time, now past) honeymoon/wedding. We also loosely decided to leave the door open in terms of writing additional articles. So really, I have never seen a cent from Microsoft. The closest I have ever come to accepting anything from Microsoft is whatever comes in a “goodie bag” for attending one of their events, and winning prizes at my local developer’s meeting, some of which were donated by Microsoft. Now that you know the full truth (I may add, I beleive that only one other person has ever called my integrity into question before around my association with Microsoft), I hope that you see that there is hardly enough connection for me to either have a strong financial incentive or an emotional incentive to promote their “party line.”

    3. No one from Microsoft (or from TechRepublic/ZDNet/CNet/CBS Interactive) has ever once told me what to write, how to write it, what stance they think it correct, or otherwise had influence over the content of my writing. There is an editor I work with, and she strictly checks grammar, looks for sentences that might not be clear, and so on. From time to time, representatives from all of the above organizations (and other groups and companies, or course) offer to put me in touch with people to interview, or send me ideas that they think may make good articles (not the actual content itself, just the concept). Despite the fact that Microsoft advertisements are often found on various CBS Interactive properties (CBSI is TechRepublic’s owner after buying CNet last year), the “church and state” separation between content and revenue has never been breached *in my experience* (some may have different opinions, and I recall there being a stink about this at GameSpot a year or two ago).

    4. Mono is news, and it regards the .Net ecosystem. I cover news, and I focus on the .Net ecosystem. The fact that I cover anything Linux oriented should make you happy, not angry. The fact is, many (if not most) tech writers stick to their “box”. While I most cover .Net stuff, my “weekly roundup” features news from all over the map (although, due to the RSS feeds I subscribe to, it is still rather .Net heavy). This month, I am writing about a system called “OutSystems” and I published a review of a book about an open source, PHP CMS system (which I personally run on FreeBSD on my personal server). Next month I should be publishing a review of “The Ruby Programming Language”. I give coverage to topics based on the following criteria:

    * Does it feel newsworthy? Is it new, or is it a “me too” item?
    * In the past, when I have covered similar (or the same) topics, have the readers seemed interested? Did they click the “thumbs up” button? Did they post comments that showed that they were engaged or cared about the topic, even if they disagreed with me?
    * Is the topic interesting to me personally?
    * Do I have enough experience in the area to write credibly about it?

    This is the second time you have bashed me from your soapbox here. Last time you apologized to me, but judging from what you wrote about how you blasted me previously, if I do get a second apology from you, I am certain that it too will be hollow.

    J.Ja

  2. Justin James said,

    May 9, 2009 at 10:14 am

    Gravatar

    I may also note (somehow I completely forgot to point this out) that my hands-on article on Mono was actually rather negative. I would think that for someone who is so against Mono in the first place, you would be delighted to see a respected, “hands on” writer such as myself actually try it and say some fairly negative things. But I suppose you were blinded by your fury that someone dared to acknowledge the existence of Mono and give it a fair shake in the first place.

    J.Ja

    Roy Schestowitz Reply:

    Hi Justin,

    Yes, bringing up the existence of Mono alone can be harmful. There is no such thing as bad publicity (with exceptions) and Mono is an embodiment of Microsoft in something which it is actively suing and trying to destroy. Mono is the creation of a guy who tried to work for Microsoft and finally he does.

What Else is New


  1. Links 22/1/2018: Linux 4.15 Delayed Again, Libinput 1.9.901

    Links for the day



  2. Team UPC Calls Critics of the UPC Idiots, Deletes Their Comments, and Blocks Them

    A new low for Team UPC, which is unable to cope with reality and has begun literally mocking and deleting comments of people who speak out truths



  3. How the Opposition to CRISPR Patents at the EPO Sent Shockwaves Through the Industry

    Additional reports/coverage on the EPO (European Patent Office) revoking Broad Institute's CRISPR patent show that the issue at hand isn't just one sole patent but the whole class/family of patents



  4. Unified Patents Says That RPX, Which Might Soon be Owned by Patent Trolls, Paid Patent Trolls Hundreds of Millions of Dollars

    Unified Patents, which helps crush software patents, takes note of RPX’s financial statements, which reveal the great extent to which RPX actually helped trolls rather than stop them



  5. IAM Together With Its Partner, IIPCC, is Lobbying the USPTO to Crush PTAB and Restore Patent Chaos

    Having handled over 8,000 petitions (according to Professor Lemley's Lex Machina), PTAB champions patent quality at the USPTO, so front groups of the litigation 'industry' creep in and attempt to lobby the likely next Director of the USPTO (inciting him against PTAB, as usual)



  6. Software Patents Are Still Dropping Like Flies in 2018, Thanks to Alice v CLS Bank (SCOTUS, 2014) and Section 101 (USPTO)

    Section 101 (§ 101) is thriving in the sense that it belatedly throws thousands of patents -- and frivolous lawsuits that depend on them -- down the chute; the patent trolls and their allies in the patent microcosm are very furious and they blame PTAB for actually doing its job (enforcing Section 101 when petitioned to do so)



  7. Patent Troll Finjan Looks Like It's About to Collapse, But Patent Maximalists Exploit It for Software Patents Promotion

    Patent trolls are struggling in their use of software patents; few (if any) of their patents are upheld as valid and those that miraculously remain in tact become the subject of fascination if not obsession among trolls' advocates



  8. The Attacks on PTAB Are Slowing Down and Attempts to Shield Oneself From Inter Partes Reviews (IPRs) Are Failing

    The Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) reapplies patent eligibility tests/guidelines in order to squash likely invalid patents; The litigation 'industry' is not happy about it, but its opposition to PTAB is also losing steam



  9. Links 21/1/2018: Wine 3.0 Coverage, KaOS 2018.01, Red Hat Among 'Admired Companies'

    Links for the day



  10. Blockchain Patents Are a Catastrophe in the Making as Trolls and Aggressors Accumulate Them

    As patents pertaining to blockchains continue to be granted -- even in defiance of Alice/Section 101 -- it seems likely that patent wars will sooner or later erupt, involving some large banks, IBM, and patent trolls associated with the notorious Erich Spangenberg



  11. Qualcomm/Broadcom/NXP Combination Would Become a Disastrous Patent Thicket Which Benefits Nobody

    Worried by the prospect of mega-mergers and takeovers which would put far too much market power (and monopoly through patents) in one place, governments and corporations speak out



  12. Patent Litigation in East Asia: Huawei, Samsung, HTC, Nintendo and COLOPL

    A quick look at some high-profile cases in which large Asian firms are embroiled; it seems clear that litigation activities have shifted eastwards (where actual production is done)



  13. Patent Litigation in the US is Down Sharply and Patent Trolls' Demise Has Much to Do With It

    Docket Navigator and Lex Machina both show a significant decline in litigation -- a trend which is likely to carry on now that TC Heartland is in tact (not for just half a year but a whole year) and PTAB completes another record year



  14. Cheating the US Patent System is a Lot Harder After TC Heartland

    Some new examples of tricks (and sometimes cheats) attempted by patent claimants and their representatives; it does not go as well as they hoped



  15. RPX Might Soon be Owned by Patent Troll Erich Spangenberg

    RPX, whose top executives are leaving and business is gradually dying, might end up as another 'asset' of patent trolls



  16. Patent Quality (Not Numbers) as an Asset: Oppositions, Appeals and Rejections at the EPO

    Benoît Battistelli wants a rubber-stamping operation (like INPI) rather than a functional patent office, but oppositions at the Office prove to be fruitful and many erroneously-granted patents are -- by extrapolation -- already being revoked (affecting, in retrospect, Battistelli's so-called 'results')



  17. Links 19/1/2018: Linux Journalism Fund, Grsecurity is SLAPPing Again

    Links for the day



  18. The EPO Ignores This Week's Decision Which Demonstrates Patent Scope Gone Awry; Software Patents Brought Up Again

    The worrisome growth of European Patents (EPs) — a 40% jump in one year in spite of decline in the number of patent applications — is a symptom of the poor judgment, induced largely by bad policies that impede examiners’ activities for the sake of so-called ‘production’; this week's decision regarding CRISPR is another wake-up call and software patents too need to be abolished (as a whole), in lieu with the European Patent Convention (EPC)



  19. WesternGeco v ION Geophysical (at the US Supreme Court) Won't Affect Patent Scope

    As WesternGeco v ION Geophysical is the main if not sole ‘major’ patent case that the US Supreme Court will deal with, it seems safe to say that nothing substantial will change for patent scope in the United States this year



  20. Links 18/1/2018: MenuLibre 2.1.4, Git 2.16 Released

    Links for the day



  21. Microsoft, Masking/Hiding Itself Behind Patent Trolls, is Still Engaging in Patent Extortion

    A review of Microsoft's ugly tactics, which involve coercion and extortion (for businesses to move to Azure and/or for OEMs to preload Microsoft software) while Microsoft-connected patent trolls help hide the "enforcement" element in this whole racket



  22. Patent Prosecution Highway: Low-Quality Patents for High-Frequency Patent Aggressors

    The EPO's race to the bottom of patent quality, combined with a "need for speed", is a recipe for disaster (except for litigation firms, patent bullies, and patent trolls)



  23. Press Coverage About the EPO Board Revoking Broad's CRISPR Patent

    Even though there's some decent coverage about yesterday's decision (e.g. from The Scientist), the patent microcosm googlebombs the news with stuff that serves to distract from or distort the outcome



  24. Links 17/1/2018: HHVM 3.24, WordPress 4.9.2

    Links for the day



  25. No Patents on Life (CRISPR), Said EPO Boards of Appeal Just a Few Hours Ago

    Broad spectacularly loses its key case, which may soon mean that any other patents on CRISPR too will be considered invalid



  26. Only Two Weeks on the Job, Judge Patrick Corcoran is Already Being Threatened by EPO Management

    The attack on a technical judge who is accused of relaying information many people had already relayed anyway (it was gossip at the whole Organisation for years) carries on as he is again being pushed around, just as many people predicted



  27. EPO Board of Appeal Has an Opportunity to Stop Controversial Patents on Life

    Patent maximalism at the EPO can be pushed aback slightly if the European appeal board decides to curtail CRISPR patents in a matter of days



  28. Links 16/1/2018: More on Barcelona, OSI at 20

    Links for the day



  29. 2018 Will be an Even Worse Year for Software Patents Because the US Supreme Court Shields Alice

    The latest picks (reviewed cases) of the Supreme Court of the United States signal another year with little or no hope for the software patents lobby; PTAB too is expected to endure after a record-breaking year, in which it invalidated a lot of software patents that had been erroneously granted



  30. Patent Trolls (Euphemised as “Public IP Companies”) Are Dying in the United States, But the Trouble Isn't Over

    The demise of various types of patent trolls, including publicly-traded trolls, is good news; but we take stock of the latest developments in order to better assess the remaining threat


CoPilotCo

RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

CoPilotCo

Recent Posts