EditorsAbout the SiteComes vs. MicrosoftUsing This Web SiteSite ArchivesCredibility IndexOOXMLOpenDocumentPatentsNovellNews DigestSite NewsRSS


Treasonous Melco-Microsoft Linux Deal Already Costing Melco Business

Posted in Deals, GNU/Linux, Kernel, Microsoft, Patents at 8:31 am by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

Bad Melco

Summary: Melco’s submissive surrender to Microsoft extortion has immediate negative effect on business

WHEN Melco met Microsoft they decided to have a little racket going by letting Linux vendors suffer while they get their secret protection deal signed. Melco Holdings was one among several, but unlike TomTom for example, it did not dispute Microsoft’s claims and revealed nothing about patents — if any — that Microsoft claimed privilege for. This is what makes Melco selfish and truly damaging to the Free software which it is exploiting. As Information Week puts it in an article about Melco, Microsoft has nothing… nothing that it is willing to show. It only barks and then extorts, even if it is toothless.

The Linux community has argued that their OS does not violate any patents, and has challenged Microsoft to publicly specify exactly which patents it believes are at issue. To date, Microsoft has declined to do so.

Jay Lyman, mostly an advocate of GNU/Linux, spins the whole thing as a partly positive development, but it is wishful thinking.

Supporters of Linux and open source should be able to take the compliment, the validation and the opportunity without alarms going off every time an organization that touches Linux or open source is involved in IP licensing or litigation. After all, tell me, what enterprise organization doesn’t touch open source software in some way today? This is further validation that Linux and open source have arrived and are here to stay.

The Inquirer covered this too and so has Sean Michael Kerner, who emphasises:

Microsoft has not specifically disclosed which patents it is licensing to Melco – which is a cause for concern in my opinion.

As opposed to the TomTom incident where Microsoft exposed which patents it had issues with, in this new deal with Buffalo we don’t know. As such it could be any one or a number of patents that Microsoft has claimed that open source infringes on.

Eruaran remarks: “Send Ballmer and his execs [should go] to jail. That’s what you’re supposed to do with extortionists.

‘Max Stirner’ writes: “I am truly disgusted. I didn’t buy a buffalo router with Linux to pay [...] MS!

“Sad to say, I won’t be buying any more Buffalo products.”
‘SB’ writes: “I have a router that is Buffalo and also some of their USB wifi and all of it works excellent with Linux. Sad to say, I won’t be buying any more Buffalo products. Any company that caves into MS extortion is setting a bad example for the FOSS community. And no, I don’t hate MS or hate Windows. They’re decent products and they have their place. But MS’s behaviour in trying to strong arm everyone to maintain their products dominance with frivolous threats of patent infringement is annoying and stifles innovation. If they really had a case they would have sued every linux vendor and distro a long time ago.

By signing a patent deal with Microsoft, Melco has already lost business. Who is next to do so and end up out of business (sold behind closed doors) like Linspire or virtually on life support like Novell?

Share this post: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • co.mments
  • DZone
  • email
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • NewsVine
  • Print
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Facebook

If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

Pages that cross-reference this one


  1. aeshna23 said,

    July 18, 2009 at 8:58 am


    I’m rather sure that I have noticed some people who read BoycottNovell out of opposition to Roy’s position on software patents and related issues. I invite such people to explain why they believe Roy is wrong on this issue, because this issue is a big issue here. A big issue here is not whether RMS (peace be upon him) tells bad jokes or not.
    If we are going to rumble, let’s do it on something important, not the color of the doghouse.

  2. David Gerard said,

    July 18, 2009 at 9:01 am


    I wonder if they paid Microsoft more than a token amount, or are getting other kickbacks – whether Microsoft is viewing this as an exercise in perception management rather than a direct income source.

    Roy Schestowitz Reply:

    Here is what I found out in IRC just minutes ago. Maybe they could use some kickbacks for this ‘medal’ in Microsoft ‘s cartel lineup that helps future intimidation (you’d have to ask them to be sure, but don’t expect answers… remember that Novell was paid hundreds of millions for its patent deal).

    wallc I just finished the Melco article.  wasn’t Melco already a struggling company? Jul 18 14:42
    *amarsh04_ (n=amarsh04@ppp121-45-176-122.lns11.adl2.internode.on.net) has joined #boycottnovell Jul 18 14:43
    *amarsh04 has quit (Read error: 110 (Connection timed out)) Jul 18 14:43
    wallc Maybe they just didn’t have the resources to fight MS?  Microsoft has a reputation for intimidation. Sad, really. Jul 18 14:44
    schestowitz wallc: I sort of hope they were Jul 18 14:45
    -BNc/#boycottnovell-[schestowitz] David Schlesinger “Uses the Little Spat as an Example of Zealotry” http://ping.fm/OmvbV Jul 18 14:45
    schestowitz This ways the deals evaporate Jul 18 14:45
    schestowitz Like Linspire’s Jul 18 14:45
    wallc Microsoft also must truly hate the idea of  hardware that works with Linux Jul 18 14:45
    schestowitz wallc: yes, Microsoft attacks weak companies Jul 18 14:46
    schestowitz Cause this way they get no challenge back Jul 18 14:46
    schestowitz See TomTom Jul 18 14:46
    schestowitz Microsoft sued them DAYS after massive loss Jul 18 14:46
    schestowitz They knew TomTom was at bottom low Jul 18 14:46
    schestowitz Microsoft needs to brag about legal defeat and surrenders Jul 18 14:46
    wallc they always seem to make sure the companies can’t speak about it after the deal Jul 18 14:46
    schestowitz wallc: can you find an article showing that Melco had problems? Jul 18 14:46
    schestowitz if so, we should point it out Jul 18 14:46
    schestowitz wallc: yes, NDA Jul 18 14:46
    wallc i don’t think i read about Melco’s financial struggles in a comment on Groklaw Jul 18 14:47
    wallc oops, I mean I *think* Jul 18 14:48
    wallc oops…not I *don’t* think (even tho i don’t sometimes) : ) Jul 18 14:48
    wallc need more coffee… Jul 18 14:48
    schestowitz OK Jul 18 14:50
    schestowitz Let me add this as a comment Jul 18 14:50
    wallc Melco June financials: Jul 18 14:50
    wallc http://finance.aol.com/quotes/melco-crown-entertainment-limited-american-depositary-shares/mpel/nas Jul 18 14:50
    *littleyoy (i=8fee5438@gateway/web/freenode/x-3eb721dcb662728a) has joined #boycottnovell Jul 18 14:50
    wallc Is that the same Melco? Jul 18 14:50
    schestowitz Doesn’t sound so Jul 18 14:50
    schestowitz I was in their Web site earlier Jul 18 14:51
    schestowitz PageRank 4 Jul 18 14:51
    schestowitz Low profile Jul 18 14:51
    schestowitz it’s called Melco Holdings Jul 18 14:51
    schestowitz Seems like a subsidiary arrangement of one form or another Jul 18 14:51
    wallc lol…okay, guess i’ll go eat some breakfast and give my brain a chance to wake up Jul 18 14:51
    schestowitz A lot of people didn’t even know the company Jul 18 14:51
    schestowitz Some know its Linux *product* Jul 18 14:51
    schestowitz But not the obscure (relatively) company Jul 18 14:52
    schestowitz wallc: OK, laters. Jul 18 14:52
  3. twitter said,

    July 18, 2009 at 9:37 am


    Unable to post to 451 article due to “spam filter”:

    Here’s some information I was able to dig up about this extortion. Their devices all used GNU/Linux and were a favorite for their flexibility and high quality. Wikipedia had a lot of good resources and the popular press also turned up a lot of good reviews. Here’s a group dedicated to making low power consumption, general purpose servers out of their devices. Surely you have heard of similar efforts with the slug. The world of GNU/Linux is as large as the world itself.
    Did I say extortion? Yes, I did, Jay. You see, I’ve never heard of you till now, but I think you have arrived as a GNU/Linux reporter. Your clumsy, in a cute hobbiest way compared to me, but we can make a deal to help improve you. I know all sorts of tricks about writing articles that I can share and I’ve got several patents on them all. We don’t need to go into the details in public, but I’m sure you will be pleased to not suffer my wrath in court. All you have to do is issue a statement praising our new partnership and send me a little money every month. Then you will be free to do as I say with your writing. I’m sure you will love using my masterful style, which has been so successful in the market place that people are just lining up to avoid court battles over it. How could you have ever been so blind?

    End post.

    It is not easy to find financial information about the company. There are many with the same name that are much larger. I recall finally finding their page in IRC. The above links to a favorable, five year old Wintel rag review, wikipedia and specific group resources.

    How much money is involved is besides the point. Not one penny is owed to M$ for GNU/Linux use, even when people make it talk to M$’s crappy software.

    Roy Schestowitz Reply:

    Jay is one of the good guys. It would help being more polite.

What Else is New

  1. The Enemies of the Patent System Are Patent Maximalists, Not Those Pursuing Saner Patent Policy

    Taking stock of some recent news and remarking (yet again) on the danger the patent system faces if it allows patent lawyers rather than inventors to steer/influence policy (as seen in Europe with the failed UPC bid)

  2. The European Patent Office’s (EPO) Declining Patent Quality 'Tackled' by Making Appeals/Oppositions Harder and More Expensive

    The so-called 'System Battistelli' is proving to be a disaster which makes both examiners and patents obsolete; Making applications cheaper while making appeals/oppositions harder and more expensive is a recipe for disaster, assuring nothing but more litigation and more workloads for courts, where fees rise to extraordinary levels (in effect externalising the costs/toll of EPO to the public, primarily for gains of patent law firms)

  3. Ericsson, Acting Directly Rather Than Via the Patent Trolls It Habitually Uses, in a Patent War Against Linux/Android

    LG is the latest company to be sued by Ericsson, which doesn't just harass the competition (which actually sells something) through patent trolls but also directly, having won a case in the notorious Eastern District of Texas (EDTX/TXED)

  4. The Federation of International Civil Servants' Association: Frenchman “Campinos is Known for Having Close Ties to Mr. Battistelli Who Strongly Supported His Candidacy.”

    Readers find little or no room for optimism as Battistelli's final day at the Office approaches; FICSA is not optimistic either and the general consensus is that Battistelli's so-called 'reforms' will soon yield layoffs

  5. Links 22/3/2018: Mesa 17.3.7, Mesa 18.0.0 RC5, RawTherapee 5.4, Krita 4

    Links for the day

  6. Japan is Becoming Firmer on Patents, Whereas China Goes in the Opposite Direction

    Japan has become less tolerant of patent aggressors and more conscious/concerned about patent quality, which is why the patent microcosm would rather hail China as a role model (even when China's overall share of patents in Europe, for example, is about the same as tiny South Korea and a lot smaller than Japan's)

  7. Aggressive New Activities of Microsoft-Connected Patent Trolls: Finjan, Intellectual Ventures, and Dominion Harbor

    The extensive group of Microsoft-connected patent trolls is still very much active; Microsoft funds them, arms them, and gives them instructions while offering people 'protection' from them (if and only if they choose Azure)

  8. Battistelli's Ongoing Attacks on the Boards Are Helping Unitary Patent (UPC), Which in Turn Helps French Patent Trolls

    Battistelli will likely be remembered not only as the man who attacked justice (and judges) but also rendered staff redundant, issued a lot of highly controversial patents, and by doing so helped the insurgence of patent trolls in Europe

  9. Links 21/3/2018: Cutelyst 2, More on webOS

    Links for the day

  10. SUEPO: “Today May Be Your Last Chance to Demonstrate Against the Seriously Flawed Reforms That Mr Battistelli Has Imposed” on EPO Staff

    Benoît Battistelli will likely remain involved in EPO affairs for a long time to come (even through a fellow Frenchman, Campinos, whom he swaps two chairs with at the Office and CEIPI), but today is the last opportunity for EPO staff to march in protest against the Battistelli regime, which for the first time ever will result in major staff cuts and growing irrelevance for the Office

  11. Links 20/3/2018: GStreamer 1.14.0, Freespire 3.0, Endless OS 3.3.13

    Links for the day

  12. BIO, MDMA and PhRMA Are Pushing the PTAB-Hostile STRONGER Patents Act While IAM and Patently-O Continue to Bash PTAB

    The patent microcosm, which compares the Board to the above (crude analogy from Judge Rader and other patent extremists), is still trying to kill inter partes reviews (IPRs), in effect overlooking its own hypocrisy on the matter (they don’t want patent justice, they just want to metaphorically ‘shoot down’ the judges)

  13. 35 U.S.C. § 101 is Still Effectively Tackling Software Patents in the US, But Patent Law Firms Lie/Distort to 'Sell' These Anyway

    The assertion that software patents are still worth pursuing in 2018 is based on carefully-constructed spin which mis-frames several court decisions and underplays/downplays/ignores pretty much everything that does not suit the narrative

  14. Battistelli's EPO Became Extremely Reliant on China for Distraction and on Endless Supply of Applications (Supply Which Doesn't Exist)

    Discussion about the EPO granting machine (or patent-printing machine) and figures the way EPO management would rather the public won't ever see them; the concept that China means redemption for this patent system is as laughable as always

  15. The US International Trade Commission (USITC) Against Comcast, Courtesy of the Intellectual Ventures-Connected Rovi

    The USITC/ITC, which mostly serves to impose embargoes (sometimes in shocking defiance of PTAB decisions), is being invoked by a firm connected to the world’s largest patent troll, Intellectual Ventures

  16. Tinder/Match Group Uses Software Patents to Sue a Rival, Obviously Choosing to Sue in Texas

    Software patents are being used for leverage, but only those which were likely granted before Alice and only in courts at districts somewhere around Texas

  17. Links 19/3/2018: Linux 4.16 RC6, Atom 1.25, antiX 17.1, GNU Mcron 1.1

    Links for the day

  18. From PTAB Bashing to Federal Circuit (CAFC) Bashing: How the Patent 'Industry' Sells Software Patents

    The latest tactics of the patent microcosm are just about as distasteful as last month's (or last year's), with focus shifting to the courts and few broadly-misinterpreted patent cases (mainly Finjan, Berkheimer, and Aatrix)

  19. Patent Maximalists Keep Coming Up With New Terms and Buzzwords to Bypass the Practical Ban on Software Patents

    The fightback against Section 101 and the US Supreme Court (notably Alice) seems to concentrate on old and new buzzwords, such as "Software as a Medical Device" ("SaMD") or "Fourth Industrial Revolution" ("4IR"), which the EPO recently paid European media to spread and promote

  20. News About Patents is Often Just Advertisements Composed Directly or Indirectly by Companies That Sell Patents and Patent Services

    Infomercials are still dominant among news about patents, in effect drowning out the signal (real journalism) and instead pushing agenda that is detached from reality, pertinent facts, objective assessment, public interest and so on

  21. Blocks and Paywalls Won't Protect the Patent Trolls' Lobby From Scrutiny/Fact-Checking

    Joff Wild and Benoît Battistelli have much in common, including patent maximalism and chronic resistance to facts (or fact-checking)

  22. China Has Become Very Aggressive With Patents

    China now targets other Asian countries/firms -- more so than Western firms -- with patent lawsuits; we expect this to get worse in years to come

  23. UPC/Battistelli Booster IAM Blames Brexit Rather Than EPO Abuses

    While the EPO is collapsing due to mismanagement the boosters of Team Battistelli would rather deflect and speak about Brexit, which is itself partly motivated by such mismanagement

  24. European Commission Again Urged to Tackle Abuses at the European Patent Office (EPO)

    Rina Ronja Kari is the latest MEP attempting to compel the Commission to actually do something about the EPO other than turning a blind eye

  25. Links 18/3/2018: Wine 3.4, Wine-Staging 3.4, KDE Connect 1.8 for Android

    Links for the day

  26. TXED Courts Are Causing Businesses to Leave the District, Notably For Fear That Having Any Operations Based There is a Legal Liability

    A discussion about the infamous abundance of patent cases in the Eastern District of Texas (TXED/EDTX) and what this will mean for businesses that have branches or any form of operations there (making them subjected to lawsuits in that district even after TC Heartland)

  27. PTAB Hatred is So Intense Among the Patent 'Industry' That Even Scammers Are Hailed as Champions If They Target PTAB

    The patent microcosm is so eager to stop the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) that it's supporting sham deals (or "scams") and exploits/distorts the voice of the new USPTO Director to come up with PTAB-hostile catchphrases

  28. The Patent 'Industry' is Increasingly Mocking CAFC and Its Judges Because It Doesn't Like the Decisions

    Judgmental patent maximalists are still respecting high courts only when it suits them; whenever the outcome is not desirable they're willing to attack the legitimacy of the courts and the competence of judges, even resorting to racist ad hominem attacks if necessary

  29. The Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) Carries on Enforcing § 101, Invalidating Software Patents and Upsetting the Patent 'Industry' in the Process

    A quick report on where PTAB stands at the moment, some time ahead of the Oil States decision (soon to come from the US Supreme Court)

  30. Luxembourg Can Become a Hub of Patent Trolls If the EPO Carries on With Its 'Reforms', Even Without the UPC

    With or without the Unified Patent Court (UPC), which is the wet dream of patent trolls and their legal representatives, the EPO's terrible policies have landed a lot of low-quality patents on the hands of patent trolls (many of which operate through city-states that exist for tax evasion -- a fiscal environment ripe for shells)


RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time


Recent Posts