EditorsAbout the SiteComes vs. MicrosoftUsing This Web SiteSite ArchivesCredibility IndexOOXMLOpenDocumentPatentsNovellNews DigestSite NewsRSS

07.19.09

Another Microsoft Product Dies as the Company Prepares for Horrible Financial Results

Posted in Finance, GNU/Linux, Microsoft at 5:01 am by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

GNU and Linux

Summary: GNU/Linux is still destroying Microsoft by eliminating its profit margins

MICROSOFT has been killing many products recently. In the past 9 months alone, Microsoft put to end to almost 20 (maybe more, but it is difficult to keep count). We estimated that Microsoft kills, on average, about 2 products per month. So indeed, it’s time for another death knell. This one used to be a rumour. It is about Popfly, which is GNU/Linux hostile [1, 2] (also mentioned very briefly in [1, 2]).

Fortunately, given the anti-competitive nature of Popfly, this product is now officially dead.

Microsoft is shutting down its Popfly mashup tool, company officials are confirming.

Microsoft may have no choice but to shut down many more services and products. Based on this new report from the Wall Street Journal, we might see a recurrence of last quarter's results with Microsoft profits falling another 30% or more (in reality it may be a lot worse), to a great degree due to GNU/Linux which eroded Microsoft’s margins (dumping and kickbacks take their toll).

Microsoft Seen Posting Sharp Profit Decline For Fiscal 4Q

Microsoft Corp. (MSFT) is expected to post declines in profit and sales for its fiscal fourth-quarter next Thursday, as the software giant contends with flagging sales of personal computers bundled with its technology.

Microsoft will surely try to blame the economy, but Google and IBM have both just reported a rise in profit (both companies use GNU/Linux); Red Hat did too not so long ago and it is part of a trend.

Our reader Goblin wrote about the meaning of Microsoft’s expected sharp decline in profit.

It is being reported that Microsoft’s figures for Q4 that are due to be posted next Thursday are expected to be down, again.

One key reason for this is GNU/Linux, as it was confirmed by the press before (Microsoft has underperformed for a long time, but it bought back shares). Ars Technica wrote : “Client software felt the slump in PC sales, and was further harmed by the shift to netbooks; many of these run Linux, which helps Microsoft not at all.” CRN wrote: “Microsoft, like much of the IT industry, was caught off-guard by the rapid rise of the netbook category, but moved quickly to offer a netbook-specific version of XP Home to stem the tide of Linux on netbooks. When one considers that getting some revenue is better than getting none, that was a wise move.”

Another reader of ours reminds people that ARM-based sub-notebooks are going to cause another major headache to Microsoft because Vista 7 won’t run on them. Our reader writes:

We’ll see if AlwaysInnovating.com can ship this month as claimed.

I’ve wanted a solid-state ARM-based netbook since around 2001. ARM-based tablets have been around since Zaurus and in 2007 started to kick ass with OpenMoko and the Nokia N810. The software has started to catch up. Now netbook-oriented distros are being ported to ARM and industry has planned six to ten ARM-based netbooks for 2009.

It looks like the first one is about ready.

If it gets 10 hours of battery, even die hard Bill fans will find a way to upgrade to Linux even if only on the netbook.

As noted last week, ARM-based sub-notebooks are expected to grab 55 percent of this market. This can’t be good for Microsoft.

“Microsoft, the world’s most valuable company, declared a profit of $4.5 billion in 1998; when the cost of options awarded that year, plus the change in the value of outstanding options, is deducted, the firm made a loss of $18 billion, according to Smithers.”

The Economist, 1999

Share this post: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • co.mments
  • DZone
  • email
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • NewsVine
  • Print
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Facebook

If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

Pages that cross-reference this one

15 Comments

  1. Andrew Macabe said,

    July 19, 2009 at 6:54 am

    Gravatar

    The netbook phenomena has been heavily discussed in our local groups for a while now. Some disagree with us saying it’s a passing phase. OTOH we say it’s a game changer or else why would microsoft continues to endeavor to kill not only its inception (OLPC) but the current offerings available from major OEM copycats. Most of our client userbase (poor and well to do) keep asking us for netbooks.

    Microsoft’s dumping of a 8 year old application (XP) masquerading as an OS on the netbook is seen as brilliant by some established bloggers, journalists and analysts, we see that as an act of desperation. OEM strangulation and blackmail by microsoft can be readily seen by how the convicted Redmond monopolist defines what a netbook should be. Shouldn’t that be left up to the OEMs decide?

    David Gerard Reply:

    Netbooks are a game changer. Our MSI Wind is my preferred main laptop.

    I live in the cloud. Even at home, my data lives on the household file server. The most inconvenient thing about switching machines is making sure the local install of Gimp has images I was working on.

  2. David Gerard said,

    July 19, 2009 at 8:28 am

    Gravatar

    No, no! The press spin is that Windows 7 not supporting ARM is bad for *ARM*, not bad for *Microsoft*. Get with the cool kids!

    Roy Schestowitz Reply:

    Yes, it is hard to ignore that bit, is it not? See the opening of this article.

    Nice spin.

    Roy Schestowitz Reply:

    Wait… this is precious. “[A] blow to the British firm’s hopes of becoming a big player in the sector. [...] No one at ARM was immediately available for comment.

    So Microsoft told them that it’s a blow to ARM, but they didn’t even confirm this with ARM.

    This is just bad reporting. ARM was happy with Linux all along.

    Andrew Macabe Reply:

    Not really; microsoft is waiting for

    EU_AntiTrust_Conviction v2.0

    Jonathan Wong Reply:

    For what it’s worth, I do think that Windows 7 should support ARM processors.

    However, I’m guessing that the engineering effort to adopt an x86-based OS like Windows to support ARM may be quite substantial.

    IMO, this would be a great opportunity for Google Chrome OS, if and when it does come out next year.

    David Gerard Reply:

    An ARM netbook that can run plain Debian ARM would be a perfectly lovely netbook for pretty much anything I do. Flash is the main proprietary sticking point, with no good free implementation. (Every patent-encumbered codec I can think of that people actually use has a good free software implementation in FFmpeg or gstreamer-plugins-bad/ugly.)

    At any given speed of processing, ARM/MIPS will outdo x86. Every x86 these days is essentially a RISC processor with an x86 instruction decoder on the front, but that instruction decoder is still crippling for power and speed compared to purer RISC. Though Atom is doing very well for lower power at usable performance.

    Roy Schestowitz Reply:

    Jonathan Wong, please disclose that you are a Microsoft employee (TE).

  3. Mikko said,

    July 19, 2009 at 1:56 pm

    Gravatar

    Nvidia recommends Windows CE for ARM-based netbooks

    http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9134522/Nvidia_For_smartbooks_Windows_CE_beats_Android_?taxonomyId=162&pageNumber=1&taxonomyName=Processors

    Jonathan Wong Reply:

    Hmm…

    I’m not very familiar with Windows CE, but I’m not convinced that Windows CE in its current state gives users the experience they want from a netbook.

    The last CE version (6.x) was released in 2006, and as expected, lacks some the one thing a mobile netbook user likely will need – a modern web browser.

    The good thing for the consumers is that they are spoilt for choice, since besides Windows CE there are likely many other OS choices (both now and upcoming) for your ARM-based netbook.

    Mikko Reply:

    i wonder what scared nvidia to recommend windows ce for arm based netbooks

    DiamondWakizashi Reply:

    Nvidia wants Microsoft to continue using their Tegra chipset in the Zune garbage.

    http://techblips.dailyradar.com/story/zune_hd_confirmed_to_use_nvidia_tegra/

    Nvidia is ridiculous, insulting Linux because of the stupid Zune.

    Ijika Reply:

    How can an organization “insult” an operating system? Do operating systems have feelings?

    Andrew Macabe Reply:

    Could be the same people that scared ASUS into dumping xp home on their little netbook.

What Else is New


  1. Links 22/6/2018: PulseAudio 12.0, Krita 4.1 Beta, LabPlot 2.5, Git 2.18.0

    Links for the day



  2. “Dr Ernst Should be Forced by National Politicians to Step Down With Immediate Effect” After Battistelli's Latest EPO Scandals

    Further discussions about the horrible legacy of Battistelli and his protectors, who seem to be interested in a patent trolls-friendly patent system which devalues workers and consciously lowers the patent bar (at all costs, even violation of laws and constitutions)



  3. Links 21/6/2018: Microsoft's 'Damage Control' Amid Role in ICE Scandals, 11-Hour Azure Downtime (Again), GNOME 3.29.3, and More GNU/Linux Wins

    Links for the day



  4. Battistelli and Topić Lose Their Bogus 'Case' Against Judge Corcoran After They Defamed Him and Ruined His Career/Life

    The SLAPP action against Judge Patrick Corcoran, who has so far won all cases involving the EPO, is finally dismissed in Germany; what remains is an ugly legacy at the EPO, wherein everyone bold enough to say something about corruption at the top is having his or her life — not just career — destroyed



  5. Even Media of the Patent Microcosm Mentions the Decline in Quality of Patents at the EPO, Based on Its Very Own Stakeholders, While IAM Ignores the News

    The whole world basically accepts, based on patent examiners as well as those whom they interact with (patent agents), that patent quality at the EPO has sunk; but the EPO and IAM continue to vigorously deny that as it threatens some people's nefarious agenda



  6. Links 20/6/2018: Qt 5.11.1, Oracle Solaris 11.3 SRU 33, HHVM 3.27.0, Microsoft Helping ICE

    Links for the day



  7. Patent Extremists Are Unable to Find Federal Circuit Cases That Help Them Mislead on Alice

    Patent extremists prefer talking about Mayo but not Alice when it comes to 35 U.S.C. § 101; Broadcom is meanwhile going on a 'fishing expedition', looking to profit from patents by calling for embargo through the ITC



  8. What Use Are 10 Million Patents That Are of Low Quality in a Patent Office Controlled by the Patent 'Industry'?

    The patent maximalists are celebrating overgranting; the USPTO, failing to heed the warning from patent courts, continues issuing far too many patents and a new paper from Mark Lemley and Robin Feldman offers a dose of sobering reality



  9. The Eastern District of Texas is Where Asian Companies/Patents/Trolls Still Go After TC Heartland

    Proxies of Longhorn IP and KAIST (Katana Silicon Technologies LLC and KAIST IP US LLC, respectively) roam Texas in pursuit of money of out nothing but patents and aggressive litigation; there's also a Microsoft connection



  10. EPO Insiders Correct the Record of Benoît Battistelli’s Tyranny and Abuse of Law: “Legal Harassment and Retaliation”

    Battistelli’s record, as per EPO-FLIER 37, is a lot worse than the Office cares to tell stakeholders, who are already complaining about decline in patent quality



  11. Articles About a Unitary Patent System Are Lies and Marketing From Law Firms With 'Lawsuits Lust'

    Team UPC has grown louder with its lobbying efforts this past week; the same lies are being repeated without much of a challenge and press ownership plays a role in that



  12. The Decline in Patent Quality at the EPO Causes Frivolous Lawsuits That Only Lawyers Profit From

    The European Patent Office (EPO) will continue granting low-quality European Patents under the leadership of the Battistelli-'nominated' Frenchman, António Campinos; this is bad news for science and technology as that quite likely means a lot more lawsuits without merit (which only lawyers profit from)



  13. What Battistelli's Workers Think of His Latest EPO Propaganda

    "Modernising the EPO" is what Battistelli calls a plethora of human rights abuses and corruption



  14. Links 19/6/2018: Total War: WARHAMMER II Confirmed for GNU/Linux, DragonFlyBSD 5.2.2 Released

    Links for the day



  15. More Media Reports About Decline in Quality of European Patents (Granted by the EPO)

    What the media is saying about the letter from Grünecker, Hoffmann Eitle, Maiwald and Vossius & Partner whilst EPO communications shift attention to shallow puff pieces about how wonderful Benoît Battistelli is



  16. Beware Team UPC's Biggest Two Lies About the Unitary Patent (UPC)

    Claims that a Unified Patent Court (UPC) will commence next year are nothing but a fantasy of the Liar in Chief, Benoît Battistelli, who keeps telling lies to French media (some of which he passes EPO money to, just like he passes EPO money to his other employer)



  17. Diversity at the EPO

    Two decades of EPO with 16-17 years under the control of French Presidents (and nowadays predominantly French management in general with Inventor Award held in France almost half the time) is "diversity at the EPO"



  18. Orrin Hatch, Sponsored the Most by the Pharmaceutical Industry, Tries to Make Its Patents Immune From Scrutiny (PTAB)

    Orrin Hatch is the latest example of laws being up for sale, i.e. companies can 'buy' politicians to act as their 'couriers' and pass laws for them, including laws pertaining to patents



  19. Links 17/6/2018: Linux 4.18 RC1 and Deepin 15.6 Released

    Links for the day



  20. To Keep the Patent System Alive and Going Practitioners Will Have to Accept Compromises on Scope Being Narrowed

    35 U.S.C. § 101 still squashes a lot of software patents, reducing confidence in US patents; the only way to correct this is to reduce patent filings and file fewer lawsuits, judging their merit in advance based on precedents from higher courts



  21. The Affairs of the USPTO Have Turned Into Somewhat of a Battle Against the Courts, Which Are Simply Applying the Law to Invalidate US Patents

    The struggle between law, public interest, and the Cult of Patents (which only ever celebrates more patents and lawsuits) as observed in the midst of recent events in the United States



  22. Patent Marketing Disguised as Patent 'Advice'

    The meta-industry which profits from patents and lawsuits claims that it's guiding us and pursuing innovation, but in reality its sole goal is enriching itself, even if that means holding science back



  23. Microsoft is Still 'Cybermobbing' Its Competition Using Patent Trolls Such as Finjan

    In the "cybersecurity" space, a sub-domain where many software patents have been granted by the US patent office, the patent extortion by Microsoft-connected trolls (and Microsoft's 'protection' racket) seems to carry on; but Microsoft continues to insist that it has changed its ways



  24. Links 16/6/2018: LiMux Story, Okta Openwashing and More

    Links for the day



  25. The EPO's Response to the Open Letter About Decline in Patent Quality as the Latest Example of Arrogance and Resistance to Facts, Truth

    Sidestepping the existential crisis of the EPO (running out of work and issuing many questionable patents with expectation of impending layoffs), the PR people at the Office choose a facts-denying, face-saving 'damage control' strategy while staff speaks out, wholeheartedly agreeing with concerned stakeholders



  26. In the United States the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Which Assures Patent Quality, is Still Being Smeared by Law Firms That Profit From Patent Maximalism, Lawsuits

    Auditory roles which help ascertain high quality of patents (or invalidate low-quality patents, at least those pointed out by petitions) are being smeared, demonised as "death squads" and worked around using dirty tricks that are widely described as "scams"



  27. The 'Artificial Intelligence' (AI) Hype, Propped Up by Events of the European Patent Office (EPO), is Infectious and It Threatens Patent Quality Worldwide

    Having spread surrogate terms like “4IR” (somewhat of a 'mask' for software patents, by the EPO's own admission in the Gazette), the EPO continues with several more terms like “ICT” and now we’re grappling with terms like “AI”, which the media endlessly perpetuates these days (in relation to patents it de facto means little more than "clever algorithms")



  28. Links 15/6/2018: HP Chromebook X2 With GNU/Linux Software, Apple Admits and Closes a Back Door ('Loophole')

    Links for the day



  29. The '4iP Council' is a Megaphone of Team UPC and Team Battistelli at the EPO

    The EPO keeps demonstrating lack of interest in genuine patent quality (it uses buzzwords to compensate for deviation from the EPC and replaces humans with shoddy translators); it is being aided by law firms which work for patent trolls and think tanks that propel their interests



  30. Grünecker, Hoffmann Eitle, Maiwald and Vossius & Partner Find the Courage to Express Concerns About Battistelli's Ugly Legacy and Low Patent Quality

    The astounding levels of abuse at the EPO have caused some of the EPO's biggest stakeholders to speak out and lash out, condemning the Office for mismanagement amongst other things


CoPilotCo

RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

CoPilotCo

Recent Posts