Chinese Google 'Attack' Involves Microsoft Windows Flaws

Dr. Roy Schestowitz

2010-01-15 01:21:28 UTC
Modified: 2010-01-15 01:21:28 UTC

Summary: It is not Google's fault but Microsoft's fault that China managed to compromise accounts not just of Google but of over 20 other companies, by Microsoft's own admission

YESTERDAY we mentioned Google's reaction to attacks from China, which are now confirmed to be targeting different companies. It was not something against Google as Google is one among several victims and some people doubt there will be an exit from the largest Internet market.

How would leaving the Chinese market actually prevent Chinese crackers from connecting to Google servers? It would not.

Hacking Risks Persist Even If Companies Withdraw From China

Google and other enterprises still face a bleak computer security landscape that makes their companies vulnerable to hackers, whether they do business in China or not, analysts say.

Perhaps the most interesting revelation, which was found buried deep inside reports, is the role of Windows in these attacks on Google. Check this one out for example: (the emphasis in red is ours)

More sources are now claiming the Chinese government is behind the recent cyberattacks against Google and 33 other Silicon Valley companies, reports security firm Verisign iDefense. The attacks, revealed yesterday via a posting on Google's official blog, were hacking attempts on the technology infrastructure of Google and other major corporations in sectors that included finance, technology, media and chemical, said Dave Girouard, president of Google Enterprise.

[...]

While July's attacks were detected early and were largely uneventful, December's attacks did find some success. In addition, these same sources claim that the files in both cases share similar characteristics. For example, both attacks used a backdoor Trojan in the form of a Windows DLL, and both share two similar hosts for the command-and-control (C&C) communication. In layman's terms, if the cyberattack was a ground assault during a war, the C&C would be the general barking out the orders. Also in both incidents, the IP addresses used for C&C are in the same subnet and only six addresses apart from each other. That means both attacks are likely to have been instigated by the same entity and may imply that the recent victims' technology infrastructure has been compromised since July.

When one in two Windows PCs is said to be a zombie PC, the above should not be surprising. This was a targeted attack which must have relied on China activists' use of Microsoft Windows.

As the name suggests, the carefully crafted assaults differ from the net-cast-wide malware most often seen. A targeted attack specifically selects its victim and generally sends an e-mail using that person's name and perhaps business title. The body of the message might reference an attached list of business contacts, or describe it as an invoice, or use any other hook that would allay suspicion and convince the victim to double-click the attachment.

Real activists do not use Windows and should use GNU/Linux. A few moments ago, our reader Jose added information that confirms the above. It's an AP article titled "Microsoft's browser flaw exposed Google to hackers" and it says (in the opening): "Microsoft says a security flaw in its Internet Explorer browser played a role in the recent computer attacks against Google and at least 20 other companies."

In other news, a bank server has just been compromised and Baidu got hit by the same group that exploited Windows botnets to take down Twitter [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6]. We mentioned this story here and there's more from The Register:

The same group that used a DNS attack to hijack Twitter last month has defaced the home page of Chinese search engine Baidu.

Surfers visiting Baidu site on Monday night were confronted by the message "This site has been hacked by Iranian Cyber Army", together with an image of the Iranian flag. Early speculation suggests the attack involved changing Baidu's DNS records rather than a direct attack on the site itself, but this remains unconfirmed.

Baidu -- unlike Google -- was not a victim of customers who use Windows. Google should tell customers that it's not Google that's vulnerable; it's Windows. Customers should therefore rethink their platform preferences. The same already goes for banks, for similar reasons. ⬆

Comments

Yuhong Bao

2010-01-15 01:50:57

"Check this one out for example: (the emphasis in red is ours)" That is not enough evidence, as it do not say anything about security holes in Windows being used. But turned out that flaws in IE was indeed used in the attacks, again by MS's own admission: http://arstechnica.com/microsoft/news/2010/01/microsoft-warns-of-ie-security-flaw-used-in-google-attacks.ars And technically IE is indeed part of Windows, though other web browsers work on Windows too that do not have the flaw. But Adobe was partly to blame too: http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9144378/Hackers_used_rigged_PDFs_to_hit_Google_and_Adobe_says_researcher

Roy Schestowitz

2010-01-15 02:29:34

It seems like a case of "double-click to execute" in Windows, invoking proprietary software that's vulnerable (opening of a file leading to system compromise).

Yuhong Bao

2010-01-15 16:54:44

Nope, it did turned out to depend on a real security vulnerability, but if that was true, it would not be MS's fault at all (unless a stupid feature like AutoPlay was used), and that is my point.

your_friend

2010-01-15 04:38:20

Not a Microsoft flaw? Was it a Mac Botnet? A GNU/Linux botnet? An OpenSolaris or BSD botnet? How about a botnet within Google's own servers? I don't think win32.dll will run in any of those others. Only Microsoft computers have this kind of problem. Nailing down the exact causes of these massive attacks will be like naming ants, there are too many security problems in Windows to begin to make sense of it and the botnet masters use them all.

Windows needs to be taken off the web before it ruins the web for everyone.

Yuhong Bao

2010-01-15 16:53:06

Indeed, I was not claiming that the botnet runs on anything other than Windows, I was trying to say that just because that it runs on Windows doesn't mean MS is to blame. Now it did turned out MS is indeed partly to blame, I was just saying that the cited evidence was not enough.
Yuhong Bao

2010-01-15 17:32:17

"Was it a Mac Botnet? A GNU/Linux botnet? An OpenSolaris or BSD botnet? How about a botnet within Google’s own servers?" Yes, these are all in theory possible, which is why assigning blame properly is so important.

Yuhong Bao

2010-01-15 17:57:12

Now, whether this flaw warrant a switch away from Windows would be a different matter, but I will say that it would warrant a switch away from IE, not Windows. After all, IE gets security flaws almost all the time, and do people switch away from Windows because of it? No, of course not, since you can run other browsers on Windows.
Roy Schestowitz

2010-01-17 00:00:43

I have an update on this:

Adobe Flaw Wasn't Part of Attack on Google
http://www.pcworld.com/article/187043/adobe_flaw_wasnt_part_of_attack_on_google.html?tk=rss_news

NotZed

2010-01-15 11:51:20

I'd like to see google show some real nuts and ban microsoft products from their services, if they are the real basis of the problem.

(TBH, I don't have much sympathy with anyone using Microsoft Windows and being taken advantage of - in an informed world they have some responsibility for their dumb decisions too.)

Needs Sunlight

2010-01-15 14:22:26

Ten and eleven years ago, there were quite a few university IT departments which started to ban Microsoft products. You can see now how technical decisions were overridden with organized crime-like methods.

Microsofters were complaining that University educated engineers and technical staff, " someone on team fresh out of college", knew better than to run Microsoft products. See slide 2: http://groklaw.net/staticpages/index.php?page=ComesExhN04#E9346

Roy Schestowitz

2010-01-15 15:24:37

This reminds me that we ought to do more Comes-derived posts pretty soon. I've been sent some pointers to yet-undiscovered smoking guns.

Yuhong Bao

2010-01-15 17:59:12

In this case, it is an IE flaw, and Google is already encouraging a switch away from IE.

Roy Schestowitz

2010-01-15 19:13:26

Thanks. I shall do a followup post.

BetaNews Appears to Have Fired All Of Its Staff: Even serial sloppers
Gemini Protocol Turns 6 on Friday: Active (online) Gemini capsules are estimated by Lupa at over 3,000
Microsoft's "FUD-as-a-Service" (Against Linux) Not Functioning Well: This is the kind of contribution companies like Microsoft and Google have to offer to society
Betanews Becoming a Slopfarm is "Betanews Growing Alongside You", According to Betanews: Their first 'article' in over two weeks is 52% "AI-generated" (slop), 33% mixed (edited slop), 18% human-written, says an advanced scanner.
The Right to Know and the Freedom to Report on Crime (at the Higher Echelons): I'd like to do the same thing for the next 20 years
After the Web Becomes Slopped to Death: A lot of people are rightly fed up with the "modern" Web
Microsoft's Windows is a Niche Operating System in Africa: African nations aren't a large contributor to Microsoft's income, but if many African nations move away from Windows, then the monopoly is at risk
Like Most Social Control Media, Microsoft LinkedIn is Collapsing: One reason for Microsoft acquisitions is debt-loading, i.e. offloading and burying its debt
Microsoft is Losing Its Richest Clients: Unlike some very poor countries, Germany and the EU are a considerable source of income to Microsoft
Proprietary Means Not Secure: Proprietary software tends to rely on secrecy, not good design
Slop in 'AI' Clothing is a Passing Fad, We'll Get Past It (Like Blockchain Before That): Many people cheat in exams using slop and there are professionals that try using slop as a "shortcut"
GNOME Does Not Campaign Against Microsoft, KDE Does: It's good to see that KDE is still active in promotion of Free software - a term that it uses
Slopwatch: BetaNews, Linuxsecurity, and Other Prolific Slopfarms: name and shame the sites that establish such proliferation of slop
Gemini Links 18/06/2025: Birch Lake and Loon Pond: Links for the day
Over at Tux Machines...: GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Tuesday, June 17, 2025: IRC logs for Tuesday, June 17, 2025
Links 17/06/2025: "The Grift Economy" and Kubernetes Does Proprietary: Links for the day
Coffee Day and LLM Sloppers: The LLM slop "bros" are a lot like fake-money bros; they lie to people, they boast that they lie to people, and they're generally bad people, BS artists in colloquial terms
Double-Dipping the Docket for Microsoft Glory and Censorship of Microsoft Critics: same lawyer, same barrister, all US, all Microsoft
TheLayoff Censorship of IBM Threads Has Gone Truly Ludicrous: we do not argue that TheLayoff should not cull LLM slop
More Stallmanites Added to FSF Board and Summer Fundraiser Commences: There's some good news from the FSF
Gemini Links 17/06/2025: Consistency and Notes About NixOS: Links for the day
Over at Tux Machines...: GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Monday, June 16, 2025: IRC logs for Monday, June 16, 2025
July 2 2025 Would Not be First Big Wave of Microsoft Layoffs Before Major National Holiday: July 2 or 3 mark the start of a very long weekend in the US
IDG's NetworkWorld Seems to Have Just Become LLM Slop: If IDG (now controlled by China) does that in at least one site, why not the rest? Only a matter of time?
Gemini Links 16/06/2025: Free Lunches and Bookmarklet for Mastodon: Links for the day
IBM: Less Than a Month's Severance for Each Decade of Service: Yes, decade!
Taking a Lesson From Denmark and Greenland? Iceland Shows New Lows for Windows, All-Time Highs for GNU/Linux: If Microsoft sabotages systems of judges at the Hague (in order to appease the insane man who wanted to invade Greenland), why won't its neighbour Iceland take note?
BetaNews Has Just Deleted Its Latest 'Article' or Got Cracked Again and Restored From Outdated Backup Again: BetaNews seems to be in some serious trouble right now
Software Freedom is "Activism" Because the Corporate Agenda Revolves Around Bribery, Deceit, and Betrayal: At the end Software Freedom will win because it's on the same side as truth and lawfulness
The EPO, Europe's Largest Patent Office, Admits Outsourcing to Microsoft Slop: Their sole goal is to make more money
Links 16/06/2025: EchoLeak and NASA Teaming up With India: Links for the day
The Better the Understanding or the More Nations Understand the Threat Posed by Microsoft, the Faster It'll be Eradicated: We believe that the thing to advocate is self-hosting and Free software... A lack of simplicity or absence of alternatives is a form of vendor lock-in
A Week of Sunlight: They say transparency is like sunlight to a vampire
"Linux" Sites That Went Astray: there are even worse things than shutdowns
Links 16/06/2025: Climate, Wildfires, Breaches, and Monopolies: Links for the day
Links 16/06/2025: Summer in Finland and Misunderstandings: Links for the day
Over at Tux Machines...: GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Sunday, June 15, 2025: IRC logs for Sunday, June 15, 2025

Chinese Google 'Attack' Involves Microsoft Windows Flaws

Hacking Risks Persist Even If Companies Withdraw From China

Comments

Adobe Flaw Wasn't Part of Attack on Google

Recent Techrights' Posts