EditorsAbout the SiteComes vs. MicrosoftUsing This Web SiteSite ArchivesCredibility IndexOOXMLOpenDocumentPatentsNovellNews DigestSite NewsRSS


Huffington Post Lets Microsoft Lie and Lie and Lie

Posted in Deception, Free/Libre Software, FUD, Google, GPL, Microsoft, Security at 9:09 am by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

Summary: The Huffington Post is becoming filled with top Microsoft employees who use the publication for their lobbying that relies upon lies

A PUBLICATION is heading in the wrong direction when it decides to give room for convicted offenders to speak out, and moreover to spread a lot of lies. Yesterday we wrote about what was happening in the Huffington Post, whose accommodation of the whole Gates family adds an affiliation with white-collar criminals. As the screenshots above show (all from January), this has become a disturbing pattern. A few days ago, Microsoft’s Smith started lobbying Obama for almost-warrantless snoops and last night we included a link that shows the Obama administration defending the FBI’s violation of laws amid a snooping scandal (which the EFF is suing over). Microsoft’s lobbying for more of it is a subject we wrote about earlier and guess who is helping Microsoft by giving them a platform? That’s right, the Huffington Post.

“As the screenshots above show (all from January), this has become a disturbing pattern.”Gates, Ballmer, and Smith, all of whom happen to have also personally paid Obama, just treat the Huffington Post like it’s their blog. Microsoft’s new lobbying blog attracts very poor readership, so it would not serve them as much as this Huffington Post placement where Microsoft is being extremely dishonest. Brad Smith, Microsoft’s general counsel, says: “Modernization of the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act so law enforcement has the tools it needs to go after malicious hackers and deter instances of online-based crimes;…”

Over at Groklaw, Pamela Jones replies by saying: “How about Microsoft improves its software instead, so it isn’t so easy to break in? Or simpler, how about when Microsoft is informed of a security problem in its software in September, or August, it doesn’t wait to fix it until Google and other companies are hacked into by means of that very security breach in January? And how would a US law stop Chinese hackers? Really, just fix your software, please. That really would help a lot more than local laws.

Jones refers to the recent Internet Explorer fiasco [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9], which cost a lot of money, caused a lot of suffering, led to diplomatic tensions, and was caused due to Microsoft’s utter negligence [1, 2, 3].

It brings us back to the Huffington Post. Why would they want to support systematic liars and spinners? This is not healthy to readers.

“Really, just fix your software, please. That really would help a lot more than local laws.”
      –Pamela Jones
Gates is deliberately lying about Free software and spreading the illusion that it is naturally unfit for business. Such FUD is having an effect. This press release from a few days ago says: “GPL licence with a level of service usually associated with commercial business software…”

What are they trying to say? That GPL and “commercial business software” are contradictory? This is partly the result of Microsoft indoctrination, although Microsoft is not the only company responsible for this FUD.

The Gates Foundation is a self-serving financial vehicle which Digital Copyright Canada has just accused of engaging in “pseudo-philanthropy” which is “actively involved with making a variety of “teaching” (sharing of knowledge) expensive and/or illegal.”

You forgot the real issue here, which is that Bono, Gates and similar pseudo-philanthropists are actively involved with making a variety of “teaching” (sharing of knowledge) expensive and/or illegal. This is the core of what Bono is ranting about this time, suggesting the world’s governments should go as far as the human rights violations in China to (theoretically — no proof of “benefit”) grant him more money.

There are those who think that making knowledge scarce, including criminalising private citizens owning and controlling their own communications technology, is the only way to make it possible to pay authors/inventors for their important contributions to society.

The scary thing ought to be that Gates is even controlling educational systems now. See for example:

  1. Bill Gates Puts in a Million to Ratify His Role as Education Minister
  2. How the Gates Foundation is Used to Ensure Children Become Microsoft Clients
  3. More Dubious Practices from the Gates Foundation
  4. Microsoft Builds Coalitions of NGOs, Makes Political and Educational Changes
  5. Microsoft’s EDGI in India: Fighting GNU/Linux in Education
  6. Microsoft’s Gates Seeks More Monopolies
  7. Gates Foundation Funds Blogs to Promote Its Party Line
  8. Microsoft Bribes to Make Education Microsoft-based
  9. Lobbyists Dodge the Law; Bill Gates Lobbies the US Education System with Another $10 Million
  10. Gates Investments in Education Criticised; Monsanto (Gates-Backed) Corruption Revisited
  11. Latest Vista 7 Failures and Microsoft Dumping

What will Gates teach our children about Free (as in freedom, not zero-cost) software and sharing?

“There’s free software and then there’s open source… there is this thing called the GPL, which we disagree with.”

Bill Gates, April 2008

Share this post: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • co.mments
  • DZone
  • email
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • NewsVine
  • Print
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Facebook

If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

Pages that cross-reference this one


  1. your_friend said,

    January 24, 2010 at 11:15 am


    Google can and should help out more to dispel the most serious lie Microsoft is telling. Everyone knows Google but not everyone knows that Google uses free software as a foundation. They could easily correct that with a few free software themed search pages the same way they celebrate other great human achievements. Surely there would be no Google without GNU. People should know and understand this and that software freedom is useful for all sorts of business.

    Unfortunately, Google often promotes non free software over software freedom. There are many reasons for their choice of flash and their optimizations for awful browsers but the net result is to perpetuate these platforms at the expense of software freedom. For example, a Google search for “google software” mostly returns links to Windows and Mac junkware and no mention of Linux, GNU or software freedom is found. It can be further argued that only Windows and Mac users have systems so poor that they need special help from Google. The end result is the same, there is no message of freedom from one of the world’s largest business users and contributors to free software.

    Roy Schestowitz Reply:

    Software compatibility may improve when Chrome OS is out in the market. They have begun by steering away from Flash in YouTube (HTML5 but no Ogg yet), so let’s give them the benefit of the doubt and, unless shown otherwise, assume that they mean well.

    Remember that they recently bought codecs assets.

    your_friend Reply:

    My beef is that people don’t know they are using free software when they use Google. This is something that Google may not be aware of and should correct for their own sake. As astounding as it may seem, I run into people who don’t know Google uses Linux, much less what free software is. People will trust Google’s browser and OS more if they learn it’s more of the same stuff they have been using all along.

    Microsoft’s FUD against Google is hitting home and creating the oddest fears. People trust Google, despite massive libel by Microsoft, to return honest and useful search answers. Strangely, people who don’t trust Microsoft worry that Google has “too much power” over information because so many people use the search service. Strangely, they think they might reduce that risk by using a service from a company they know they can’t trust at all. They are oblivious to the monitoring and analysis and ability to steer results that Microsoft and ISPs already have and abuse. False concerns are starting to trump real issues at the expense of those trying to fix the problem. This is typical of Microsoft propaganda, but this set is extremely flimsy and easy to deflate. Google is honest and has to be because it is easy for others to set up similar services.

    Dennis Murczak Reply:

    Power tends to corrupt, that’s why many people don’t trust Google, or other big companies, or governments.

    Personally, I just observe what they do, judge them by their actions, not by what they say, and avoid lock-in. Google doesn’t seem very “evil” or corrupt so far and I use several of their services, but I always leave open backdoors so I can move somewhere else quickly if necessary.

    Being locked in and abused sucks.

    Regarding their use of Free software, probably they don’t market it because of its commodity status. They only market products that are based on it.

    Roy Schestowitz Reply:

    Google is not a problem to GNU/Linux users, that’s for sure (Free software withstanding). But some publishers feel differently.

    Jose_X Reply:

    your_friend, I agree strongly with essentially everything you said.

    I’m always for competition or ultimately for restrictions of various sorts set ideally by a government of the population. Rights to life and basics of life of person A trump other’s rights to “indulgent” property. That’s what almost anyone in position A will think, and if there are many A’s you will see action in that direction one way or the other (human nature).

    Google’s corporate plans (like any other “not evil” company that sees huge potential ahead) is to keep growing as much as possible. In their case, they appear to have the raw ingredients (mostly in terms of market and tactical position, human resources, etc) to go very far. It’s for the rest of the world to write in those checks/balances at some point in time.

    Many people at (or who have worked at) Microsoft probably think they are good people who perhaps are even helping to keep an eye on a potential run-away train by being near the controls in case very bad things start to happen (it’s a convenient position for them to be in, of course, for better or worse). Google will be composed of these very same people as well as others with less lofty goals.

    It’s important to keep perspective and be fair to Google without letting them get into a position where they can hurt us too strongly later on. At some point in time, ugly people gain access to the controls if we aren’t very critical. These ambitious people will *eventually* tend to push for stronger and stronger actions that the “nice” people nearby will find difficult to challenge forcefully enough as the time arrives for intervention. As a society, we need to set high expectations and checks/balances, demand them, and always try to find ways to audit. Democratic governments are founded on even loftier goals than was Google, but the same exact thing applies to the former, especially since governments are usually noticeably stronger than are individual companies. [Apparently, we want government to keep an eye on the management of various crucial resources that could easily result in imbalances and bloody encounters, presumably to a greater degree than when government (of people) is involved. But any form of control involves a trade-off of liberties. We need to be demanding and preferably include openness as one of our demands upon these large entities around us. As was stated, power corrupts....]

    Microsoft will eventually almost surely bias the views people get of “open source”. Google can counter that in a better way, but they too will be biased.

    Both Google and Microsoft should have to adhere to a set of laws that give the population voting rights to certain services and policies at these companies. Eventually this will likely happen if serious competition does not come about over the next few decades.

    your_friend Reply:

    I would not compare Microsoft and Google except to show the difference between night and day. It does not matter what most people at Microsoft think they are doing when convicted criminals are the ones directing them. Microsoft is a known bad organization who’s leaders clearly want to destroy or own all software and charge for all computing services. Google simply offers services that users can take or leave but mostly take because other service providers have chosen to suck by comparison. Reasonable laws and proper enforcement of existing laws would prevent much of the abuse that has given rise to Google’s dominance of services.

    One of the reasons Microsoft hates Google is because Google is routing around much of the damage Microsoft and ISPs have inflicted. Each time Google offers a service that does not suck, they take power away from the Microsoft monopoly. They offer searches that aim to be fair by statistics, email that users can access with multiple clients and archive, chat that works and will soon provide video, news and financial services and so on and so forth. In each of these services, Google gives users as much access to their information as they can, where other companies do not. The Microsoft munchkins have said, “look at the power Google has with all of this information!” by they are hypocrites because Microsoft took far more and gave less back in return. Email is an excellent example. Besides wrecking Hotmail, Microsoft pushed ISPs to use their terrible IIS based Live mail for customers in order to push Windows and Outlook. Microsoft and Yahoo services offered no way for users to download and archive their mail for themselves and most ISPs keep coppies of user email after the user deletes it. Google’s services always put traditional telco offerings to shame and embarrasses Microsoft. People see that there’s better things in the world and wonder why they use Windows at all.

    As a free software advocate, I want people to be able to run services for themselves. Especially important is encrypted communications. Microsoft has been at the forefront of making that impossible. They are responsible for blocked ports, unimplemented standards and other mischief. Google’s rescue is not something that makes me demand my freedom any less, but it is something I’m glad to have until Microsoft fails and ISPs begin to undo the damage done.

What Else is New

  1. The Spanish EPO Scandal - Part I

    How García-Escudero Marquez, the sister of a Spanish Senate speaker, got controversially appointed to succeed the (now) EPO's Vice-President Alberto Casado Cerviño

  2. Media Alert: IAM 'Magazine' Does Not Protect Sources

    An important discussion regarding the role of IAM (Intellectual Asset Management) in the debate about EPO abuses

  3. Richard Stallman and Eben Moglen on the Microsoft-Red Hat Deal

    Founder of Free software and author of the GPL (respectively) comment on what Microsoft and Red Hat have done regarding patents

  4. Links 30/11/2015: Linux 4.4 RC3, Zaragoza Moving to FOSS

    Links for the day

  5. Public Protests by European Patent Office (EPO) Staff Weaken the EPO's Attacks on the Media

    Where things stand when it comes to the EPO's standoff against publications and why it's advisable for EPO staff to stage standoffs against their high-level management, which is behind a covert crackdown on independent media (while greasing up corporate media)

  6. Why the European Patent Office Cannot Really Sue and Why It's All -- More Likely Than Not -- Just SLAPP

    Legal analysis by various people explains why the EPO's attack dogs are all bark but no bite when it comes to threats against publishers

  7. How the EPO Twisted Defamation Law in a Failed Bid to Silence Techrights

    Using external legal firms (not the EPO's own lawyers), the EPO has been trying -- and failing -- to silence prominent critics

  8. East Texas and Its Cautionary Tale: Software Patents Lead to Patent Trolls

    Lessons from US media, which focuses on the dire situation in Texas courts, and how these relate to the practice of granting patents on software (the patent trolls' favourite weapon)

  9. The Latest EPO Spin: Staff Protesters Compared to 'Anti-Patent Campaigners' or 'Against UPC'

    Attempts to characterise legitimate complaints about the EPO's management as just an effort to derail the patent office itself, or even the patent system (spin courtesy of EPO and its media friends at IAM)

  10. The Serious Implication of Controversial FTI Consulting Contract: Every Press Article About EPO Could Have Been Paid for by EPO

    With nearly one million dollars dedicated in just one single year to reputation laundering, one can imagine that a lot of media coverage won't be objective, or just be synthetic EPO promotion, seeded by the EPO or its peripheral PR agents

  11. EPO: We Have Always Been at War With Europe (or Europeans)

    The European Patent Office (EPO) with its dubious attacks on free speech inside Europe further unveiled for the European public to see (as well as the international community, which oughtn't show any respect to the EPO, a de facto tyranny at the heart of Europe)

  12. What Everyone Needs to Know About the EPO's New War on Journalism

    A detailed list of facts or observations regarding the EPO's newfound love for censorship, even imposed on outside entities, including bloggers (part one of several to come)

  13. EPO Did Not Want to Take Down One Techrights Article, It Wanted to Take Down Many Articles Using Intimidation, SLAPPing, and Psychological Manipulation Late on a Friday Night

    Recalling the dirty tactics by which the European Patent Office sought to remove criticism of its dirty secret deals with large corporations, for whom it made available and was increasingly offering preferential treatment

  14. The European Private Office: What Was Once a Public Service is Now Crony Capitalism With Private Contractors

    The increasing privatisation of the European Patent Office (EPO), resembling what happens in the UK to the NHS, shows that the real goal is to crush the quality of the service and instead serve a bunch of rich and powerful interests, in defiance of the original goals of this well-funded (by taxpayers) organisation

  15. Microsoft Once Again Disregards People's Settings and Abuses Them, Again Pretends It's Just an Accident

    A conceited corporation, Microsoft, shows not only that it exploits its botnet to forcibly download massive binaries without consent but also that it vainly overrides people's privacy settings to spy on these people, sometimes with help from malicious hardware vendors such as Dell or Lenovo

  16. When the EPO Liaised With Capone (Literally) to Silence Bloggers, Delete Articles

    A dissection of the EPO's current media strategy, which involves not only funneling money into the media but also actively silencing opposing views

  17. Blogger Who Wrote About the EPO's Abuses Retires

    Bloggers' independent rebuttal capability against a media apparatus that is deep in the EPO's pocket is greatly diminished as Jeremy Phillips suddenly retires

  18. Leaked: EPO Award of €880,000 “in Order to Address the Media Presence of the EPO” (Reputation Laundering)

    The European Patent Office, a public body, wastes extravagant amounts of money on public relations (for 'damage control', like FIFA's) in an effort to undermine critics, not only among staff (internally) but also among the media (externally)

  19. Links 27/11/2015: KDE Plasma 5.5 Plans, Oracle Linux 7.2

    Links for the day

  20. Documents Needed: Contract or Information About EPO PR/Media Campaign to Mislead the World

    Rumour that the EPO spends almost as much as a million US dollars “with some selected press agencies to refurbish the image of the EPO”

  21. Guest Post: The EPO, EPC, Unitary Patent and the Money Issue

    Remarks on the Unitary Patent (UP) and the lesser-known aspects of the EPO and EPC, where the “real issue is money, about which very little is discussed in public...”

  22. Saving the Integrity of the European Patent Office (EPO)

    Some timely perspective on what's needed at the European Patent Office, which was detabilised by 'virtue' of making tyrants its official figureheads

  23. A Call for Bloggers and Journalists: Did EPO Intimidate and Threaten You Too? Please Speak Out.

    An effort to discover just how many people out there have been subjected to censorship and/or self-censorship by EPO aggression against the media

  24. European Patent Office (EPO) a “Kingdom Above the EU Countries, a Tyranny With ZERO Accountability”

    Criticism of the EPO's thuggish behaviour and endless efforts to crush dissenting voices by all means available, even when these means are in clear violation of international or European laws

  25. Links 26/11/2015: The $5 Raspberry Pi Zero, Running Sans Systemd Gets Hard

    Links for the day

  26. EPO Management Needs to Finally Recognise That It Itself is the Issue, Not the Staff or the Unions

    A showing of dissent even from the representatives whom the EPO tightly controls and why the latest union-busting goes a lot further than most people realise

  27. Even the EPO Central Staff Committee is Unhappy With EPO Management

    The questions asked by the Central Staff Committee shared for the public to see that not only a single union is concerned about the management's behaviour

  28. The Broken Window Economics of Patent Trolls Are Already Coming to Europe

    The plague which is widely known as patent trolls (non-practicing entities that prey on practicing companies) is being spread to Europe, owing in part to misguided policies and patent maximalists

  29. Debunking the EPO's Latest Marketing Nonsense From Les Échos and More on Benoît Battistelli's Nastygram to French Politician

    Our detailed remarks about French brainwash from the EPO's media partner (with Benoît Battistelli extensively quoted) and the concerns increasingly raised by French politicians, who urge for national or even continental intervention

  30. The Sun King Delusion: The Views of Techrights Are Just a Mirror of EPO Staff Unions

    Tackling some emerging spin we have seen coming from Battistelli's private letters -- spin which strives to project the views of Techrights onto staff unions and why it's very hypocritical a form of spin


RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time


Recent Posts