The debian-private mailing list leak, part 1. Volunteers have complained about Blackmail. Lynchings. Character assassination. Defamation. Cyberbullying. Volunteers who gave many years of their lives are picked out at random for cruel social experiments. The former DPL's girlfriend Molly de Blanc is given volunteers to experiment on for her crazy talks. These volunteers never consented to be used like lab rats. We don't either. debian-private can no longer be a safe space for the cabal. Let these monsters have nowhere to hide. Volunteers are not disposable. We stand with the victims.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: A Solution

Klee Dienes <klee@mit.edu> writes:

> On Fri, 28 Mar 1997, Enrique Zanardi wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 28 Mar 1997, Martin Schulze wrote:
> >> Partially our structure has to be reverted.  We IMHO need a public
> >> available todo list.  It explicitely has to contain a detailed list.
> > 
> > IMO, the list should enumerate the ongoing efforts, who is doing 
> > what, and the current state, 'a la' Linux Projects Map.
> 
> I don't mean to take away from the idea of a publically avaiable to-do
> list, as I think it is a good one.
> 
> But let's not forget that we already have one good publically
> available to-do list---called the "debian bug tracking system"---that
> has close to 2,000 entries at this point.  Reducing this to a
> manageable number would go a long way toward making the bug tracking
> list feel more like a to-do list again and less like a graveyard.

There was discussion about introducing priorities for bug reports.

We need a conesnsus on the priority classes and on the procedure of
handling priorities.

And we need someone who implements this in the bug tracking
system. AFAIK Ian Jackson did the whole bug tracking system, but he is
too busy. So someone else will have to tak responsibility for the bug
tracking system code.

	Sven
-- 
Sven Rudolph <sr1@inf.tu-dresden.de> ; WWW : http://www.sax.de/~sr1/