04.05.08

Gemini version available ♊︎

Did Microsoft Attack IBM by Proxy to Restrain OOXML Critics?

Posted in Bill Gates, Formats, IBM, ISO, Open XML, OpenDocument, SCO, Standard at 1:47 am by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

Watch the evidence, but pass your own judgment

Just days after accusations had been made against IBM and a ban put in place, IBM was cleared of all charges and the ban was lifted. The Register was quick with its report and so was The Inquirer.

It’s not entirely clear what the EPA ban was for in the first place, but IBM said in a statement that it would continuing to cooperate with the EPA and the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Eastern District of Virginia, which served grand jury subpoenas in search of documents and testimony relating to the contract. So apparently, they don’t know what’s going on either then.

The news about the ban came at a hugely interesting time. It came almost at the same time that ISO’s outrageous sellout was declared (OOXML approved). In fact, just two days beforehand (on March 31st to be precise), the following article was just one among many that got published to severely damage IBM’s reputation:

IBM blackballed in US federal ambush

IBM learned of its temporary banishment through a third-party source last Friday. Upon looking at the US General Services Administration website, the company found it was on the excluded parties list, along with minimal information.

“Prior to learning of the temporary suspension on March 28, 2008, IBM was not aware that the EPA or US Attorney’s office were considering any action against IBM,” the company said today.

Remember Dennis Byron, formerly an 'analyst' at the Microsoft-funded IDC, who several weeks ago wrongly accused IBM of corruption related to government procurement and document formats [1, 2, 3, 4]? Andy Updegrove promptly contradicted his libelous claims and did so completely, but those false claims had already entered relevant news feeds about document formats. Byron also denied knowing who I am, despite sending me E-mails in the past, which is suspicious in its own right. We have seen cases of manufactured consent before [1, 2] and who could ever forget Microsoft’s own words, such as:

“Analysts sell out – that’s their business model…”

Microsoft, internal document

If you trawled around Microsoft blogs and various pro-Microsoft ‘talking heads’ at that time of ISO’s announcement and immediate backlash, you’d see statements like “it only comes to show that IBM does this too.” This was said in reference to the baseless smears above, which are no longer substantiated. When and where have seen this before? Have a look right here. Microsoft used a journalist whom it invited to Redmond. He spread the anti-IBM smear, which went a very long way (including Slashdot, not just Microsoft’s many blogs). Microsoft is well aware of its own crimes, so it resorts to accusing others, as in “let’s call it even.” Did it fabricate allegations? This time it’s difficult to tell. This was seen as definite in the past, but this time around we only have suspicion and isolated bits of supporting evidence. Of course, it could all just be a series of coincidences, so we mustn’t rule that possibility out. But let us explore a little further.

“Microsoft is well aware of its own crimes, so it resorts to accusing others, as in “let’s call it even.””As you can trivially find in the latest news, the whole accusation turns out to be some kind of a horrible mistake that no-one understands (total bafflement) and it’s worth stressing that the timing was interesting — almost as interesting as those responses from Microsoft apologists who defended Microsoft’s actions by wrongly accusing IBM.

Linking to this to-be expired article from Associated Press, Pamela Jones from Groklaw added the following remark at the time (on March 31st): “You don’t suppose some Microsoft proxy filed a complaint??”

Coming from someone who has ‘religiously’ covered the “SCO versus IBM” saga for over 4 years (and, moreover, turned out to be right despite opposition from all directions), this remark should not be immediately dismissed or overlooked. Pamela has earned her hugely high credibility and in fact only days ago she proved yet again that more of her insights were correct all along, more specifically in relation to OLPC and Intel’s sabotage of this charity. To be specific, 3 days ago she put the following text in News Picks, linking to a this article I had sent her.

“The Eee PC’s success wasn’t possible without Intel’s support. The chip maker was initially hesitant to embrace Asustek’s push into low-cost laptops for fear it would drive down margins for its mobile processors if users opted to buy low-cost laptops instead of more powerful — and more expensive — models. But Intel eventually decided that the opportunity to expand the size of the overall laptop market outweighed the risks of lower profit margins, and gave its backing to the little laptops.”

[PJ: I hate to say I told you so, but I told you so. All you folks who flamed me for saying Intel was involved with Asus can now send me emails of apology. Chocolate would be nice too. It would show sincerity, don't you think?]

Back to IBM, there is some more evidence here which could — just could — suggest Microsoft involvement in this latest debacle. Maybe it prodded someone to file a complaint just shortly before the big volcano over ISO finally erupted.

In particular, given recent precedence, it’s clear that Microsoft’s role should at least raise some healthily-restrained dosage of suspicion. Only months ago we saw the following eye-opening incident, which was described as a possible proxy war waged between Microsoft and IBM:

Read these articles again and become as shocked as Brian Proffitt to find a reality of legal proxy wars. We covered several more such examples in [1, 2, 3, 4]. Some of them include IBM, but they are barely visible in the 'mainstream press' (with the Gates-Murdoch filter applied to it).

It must never be forgotten that Microsoft was behind a very large investment in SCO and more recently suspicions were raised due to Bill Gates’ connection with Prince Al-Waleed bin Talal Al Saud, who was going to inject some more money into SCO (via an obscure American venture capitalist who needed this loan). Later came all sorts of cover-ups and lies, which perhaps made those involved panic, then walking away, as reported just 2-3 days ago in the press. There will always be the suspicion that Microsoft was at least partly responsible for SCO’s demise, no matter the context or event. How deep does all of this dishonesty run?

Share in other sites/networks: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Reddit
  • email

Decor ᶃ Gemini Space

Below is a Web proxy. We recommend getting a Gemini client/browser.

Black/white/grey bullet button This post is also available in Gemini over at this address (requires a Gemini client/browser to open).

Decor ✐ Cross-references

Black/white/grey bullet button Pages that cross-reference this one, if any exist, are listed below or will be listed below over time.

Decor ▢ Respond and Discuss

Black/white/grey bullet button If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

5 Comments

  1. Dennis Byron said,

    April 5, 2008 at 6:26 am

    Gravatar

    The writer of this blog post is intentionally lying about me, Dennis Byron. I have never read his blog posts but readers should assume that he is lying about everything else he posts as well.

    For the record, I never accused IBM/Cognos of corrupt practices. The Boston Globe did. And it didn’t have anything to do with document formats. If he or someone else has an issue with that post they are welcome to comment on my blog.

    Second, until March 17 when the author of this blog post first lied about me (to the best of my knowledge it was the first time), I had never heard of Boycott Novell. I subsequently searched comments on my various blog sites and found nothing from this author or anything to do with Boycott Novell.

    Now that he says above that it was an email exchange between us (which does not seem to mention Boycott Novell but his emails are pretty long and incoherent so it might be there), I now know what he was talking about. Since the author chooses to make personal communications public, the situation was as follows.

    1. In September 2007, the author “attacked” IDC and Heather Bellini on Savio Rodrigues’ blog, something he seems to do all the time (to the absurd level that he attacks me and I haven’t worked at IDC for some time).
    2. I asked the author by email to send me examples of when and where IDC had done the dastardly deeds he accused it of. Using that information, I said, I would be happy to analyze them and explain to him why he was incorrect in his accusations.
    3. His email response was: “Placements that I had in mind do not come from analysts, but from various journalists and lobbying arms such as ComptTIA and ACT…”

    When challenged personally to back up his outrageous lies about analysts, he cannot. I didn’t mean analysts, he says, I meant journalists. Ok, I am writing to you now as a journalist, give me some examples of journalistic malfeasance and I will analyze those examples. Why do I have a feeling he will change his tune for the fourth time.

    There is much more to the email exchange to which he is referring. Now that I have found out what he talking about, I will post the email exchange in full on my web site.

    Dennis Byron

  2. Roy Schestowitz said,

    April 5, 2008 at 6:40 am

    Gravatar

    For the record, I never accused IBM/Cognos of corrupt practices. The Boston Globe did. And it didn’t have anything to do with document formats.

    Here is the response from Andy to what you wrote:

    Having reread your post after reading your comment above, I see that the problem is that on a fair reading, you are (perhaps accidentally) conflating two events from two different periods of time in a way that, to me, reads as if they are directly connected. As I read it, it sounds as if you are saying that IBM stacked a committee that was directly involved with ODF, and that this influenced the outcome on ODF. Neither of these statements would be true, based upon what I have seen (including a full response from the Information and Technology Division under the Massachusetts equivalent of a Freedom of Information Act request for all ODF-related materials from 2004 through 2007, and many interviews with many of those most concerned, including in the Auditors office). Moreover, one thing that angered Senator Pacheco and some others was that in their view the ITD had not involved the technology task force at all.

    I have not personally looked into any events in 2002-3, and therefore have no basis to comment on re quibble with any statements relating to the Globe article.
    That said, I do not recall anyone mentioning those events in 2005 (that includes people I talked to at Microsoft, people in the ITD, and other interested parties). I have not gone back to reread it since it was issued, but I do not recall that its conclusions and recommendations were based upon any such connection. In any event, however, that report was not only advisory in nature, but was delivered a year after the legislative actions (and inaction) in question.

    “So to summarize, my concerns would be addressed if your article stated that there was an event in 2002-03, and another event in 2005-07, each of which involved interaction between powerful vendors and Massachusetts government, but not suggesting that IBM engineered the ITD’s decision to adopt ODF, which I do not believe is supportable by the facts.

    Source: http://consortiuminfo.org/standardsblog/article.php?story=20080319171133815

    My views about particular groups of analysts remain unchanged. This is not government-funded academia and few analysts work without incentives from companies. IDC happens to be one of the more aggressive examples. See some among many examples where even disclosures get removed to please the paying customer (Microsoft). This is not acceptable and it continues to this date.

    I apologise for being unable to approach this more gently than I have.

  3. Dave said,

    April 5, 2008 at 7:16 am

    Gravatar

    Dennis, I guess Microsoft was right about the bit where analysts can get prickly when they are seen to be selling out. If you want to make a living defending Microsoft, you are going to have to grow a thicker skin.

  4. Victor Soliz said,

    April 5, 2008 at 10:08 am

    Gravatar

    The writer of this blog post is intentionally lying about me, Dennis Byron. I have never read his blog posts but readers should assume that he is lying about everything else he posts as well.

    That’s not exactly the best example on damage control. Looks like you are just rushing to try to disqualify the blogger rather than fight the statements.

    I actually wish most of the things said in this site were a lie, unfortunately, that isn’t the case.

  5. Rascalson said,

    April 7, 2008 at 9:05 pm

    Gravatar

    I agree. Very weak damage control from the MS press.

DecorWhat Else is New


  1. IRC Proceedings: Monday, September 26, 2022





  2. Links 26/09/2022: FocusWriter 1.8.3 and Istio 1.15.1

    Links for the day



  3. Media Censorship is Spreading and Infesting the World Wide Web

    Media and social control media are manipulating what people are reading and writing; this is done in the name of protecting us from misinformation, but oftentimes it's done to actually hide verifiable information (in order to protect a government's self-serving disinformation campaign)



  4. [Meme] Buy GitHub, Buy Systemd, Buy Canonical, Bye-Bye GNU/Linux

    Windows is losing ground fast; taking over the competitor/s is an antitrust violation, but who is left to file a complaint when bribery becomes so routine?



  5. GNU is Turning 39 Years Old in a Matter of Hours (and You're Very Likely Using It All the Time But Simply Unaware of That, Referring to It by the 'Wrong' Name)

    GNU is the project that gave us GCC (Free/libre compiler) and the GPL, among many other things; it's important to recognise the significance of its genesis 39 years ago in Massachusetts



  6. IRC Gateway Issues and Separating the Main Techrights IRC Channel From Non-Tech-Related Politics

    We're branching off to an old IRC channel (abandoned for many months already) and one of the Web gateways seems to be down at the moment (for all networks we've tested with), so please be patient



  7. Microsoft Layoffs Are Huge and Engaging With Microsoft Lowers Your Employment Prospects

    Microsoft is where people’s careers end (even if they delude themselves otherwise); it seems poetic that LinkedIn is dying, having become little but a massive waste of money and a liability



  8. Microsoft Is Vanishing From Netcraft

    Despite its so-called 'clown-first' strategy (clown computing), Microsoft is almost nowhere to be seen at the back end (server side); the media is massively inflating the perceived share of Azure, which may in fact be operating at a loss because there are layoffs and the future is sadly involving some proprietary actors like ClownFlare



  9. Why Canonical is Not a Friend of GNU/Linux Freedom and Mentioning WSL/systemd Helps Windows

    Ubuntu’s promotion of WSL is a disgrace and a reminder that we should no longer recommend Ubuntu to anyone; there are many other GNU/Linux distributions which are vastly more deserving of users and some new ones reject systemd as well



  10. Links 26/09/2022: GnuCash 4.12 and Microsoft Breaches

    Links for the day



  11. Microsoft LinkedIn “Experimented” on Over 20 Million People Over Five Years and May Have Stopped Some of Them From Getting a Job

    Reprinted with permission from Ryan



  12. Links 26/09/2022: GNUnet 0.17.6 and Science News

    Links for the day



  13. IRC Proceedings: Sunday, September 25, 2022

    IRC logs for Sunday, September 25, 2022



  14. GNU is Not UNIX: GNU Project Turns 39

    Tomorrow (Tuesday) is a special day; 39 years since the message (announcement) below, so next year it's 40 (a major time leap in the context of software development; not much stuff lasts this long)



  15. Links 25/09/2022: Linux 6.0 RC7 and PostgreSQL-Related Releases

    Links for the day



  16. Links 25/09/2022: EasyOS 4.4, KDE Reviewed

    Links for the day



  17. Microsoft is Trying to Eliminate POP3 and IMAP for E-mail (Attack on Commodity or Standard Protocols)

    Microsoft is trying to decommoditise (read: control) E-mail by shutting out people who use standard protocols; how long have we got before E-mail becomes a surveillance-intensive walled garden?



  18. IRC Proceedings: Saturday, September 24, 2022

    IRC logs for Saturday, September 24, 2022



  19. YouTube (Alphabet Gulag) Keeps Censoring Videos About Free Software and GNU/Linux

    YouTube (the Alphabet/Google Gulag) seems to be weeding out discussion of software freedom; it's a longstanding issue reported by several GNU/Linux-centric channels over the years



  20. Links 24/09/2022: pgAdmin 4 v6.14 and ONLYOFFICE 7.2 Released

    Links for the day



  21. Links 23/09/2022: KDE Weekly Outline and UbuntuDDE Remix 22.04

    Links for the day



  22. IRC Proceedings: Friday, September 23, 2022

    IRC logs for Friday, September 23, 2022



  23. Geminispace Roughly Quadrupled in Size (and Grew a Lot in Terms of Number of Capsules) Since We Joined It Last Year

    Despite the media's apathy (pretending that Gemini does not exist or does not matter), Geminispace continues to expand and we have 42,703 pages in it



  24. [Meme] Getting Promoted (or Hired/Recruited/Absorbed Directly Into Top Management) by Knowing “The F***ing President”

    The EPO‘s own numbers indicate that as a female it's incredibly hard to get promoted at the EPO; the insiders’ joke is, you need to be a former colleague of Benoît Battistelli/António Campinos (or even a spouse) to get promoted



  25. According to EPO Data, Women Have No Place at the EPO (Unless They Fancy Being Underpaid)

    The European Patent Office, accused by a former president who was female of an “alphamale” issue, treats women poorly; incidentally, she wasn’t just the only female president in a ~25 year period but also the only non-French president in that same period (EPO diversity is a sad farce)



  26. Links 23/09/2022: PeerTube 4.3 and GNOME Report

    Links for the day



  27. Links 23/09/2022: EuroBSDcon 2022 Ahead, PowerDNS Recursor 4.5.11, 4.6.4 and 4.7.3 Out

    Links for the day



  28. IRC Proceedings: Thursday, September 22, 2022

    IRC logs for Thursday, September 22, 2022



  29. Links 22/09/2022: ExTiX 22.9, Rust 1.64.0, Weston 11.0.0, New Mesa, and OpenCL 3.0.12

    Links for the day



  30. Microsoft Will Soon be Unlisted in Netcraft's Web Survey (Due to Minuscule, Negligible Market Share)

    A few hours ago this was released by Netcraft; it seems clear that Netcraft’s tables already omit Microsoft in all except 2, where Microsoft is placed last and rapidly loses share (it’ll fall out of sight soon)


RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

Recent Posts