12.20.09

Gemini version available ♊︎

Reader’s Article: Google’s Chrome EULA Disappoints

Posted in Free/Libre Software, FSF, Google at 3:47 pm by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

Chrome logoSummary: Thoughts about Chrome from a legal perspective

ONE OF OUR readers has composed the following assessment of Chrome and what it means to the users’ freedom.

I thought it would be nice to try out Chrome for Linux but decided not to because of the binary EULA. I’d like to have a way to watch YouTube without installing Adobe’s Flash. EULAs always put a bad taste in my mouth, surely Google’s would not be so bad? Nope, like most EULAs this one is poorly worded and demands a surrender of rights contrary to many nations’ laws.

http://www.google.com/chrome/intl/en/eula_text.html

The misleading term “intellectual property” shows up many times. This neologism reduces the justification and powers of copyright, patent and trade mark law to one weak minded confusion. Powers appropriate for one set of laws are transfered to the others while the purposes are forgotten. It has no place in law, contracts or intelligent discourse. The contract also uses the insulting and disrespectful phrase “content” to describe works.

http://www.fsf.org/licensing/essays/words-to-avoid.html

The two most most shocking clauses demands recognition of software patents and surrender of fair use rights.

8.1 You acknowledge and agree that Google (or Google’s licensors) own all legal right, title and interest in and to the Services, including any intellectual property rights which subsist in the Services (whether those rights happen to be registered or not, and wherever in the world those rights may exist).

7.2 … You may not modify, rent, lease, loan, sell, distribute or create derivative works based on this Content (either in whole or in part) unless you have been specifically told that you may do so by Google or by the owners of that Content, in a separate agreement.

The source code terms are a lot better, so I have to wonder what the Google people were thinking above. The general license terms look like free software but specific portions include a confusing variety of MIT, BSD and even a deceptive license from Microsoft.

http://code.google.com/chromium/terms.html

Overall, I don’t think I’d get what I wanted, which was a dedicated, fast browser for Google services that understood flash without being obnoxious. If Chrome really is free software, people will make it work from source code and it will soon end up in repositories. I’d rather wait than sign away free use and agree that software patents are legitimate.

Speaking for myself, I avoid Chrome because I believe people need to empower Free software vendors like Mozilla and projects like GNOME and KDE. Using their Web browsers is the latest one can do.

Share in other sites/networks: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Reddit
  • email

Decor ᶃ Gemini Space

Below is a Web proxy. We recommend getting a Gemini client/browser.

Black/white/grey bullet button This post is also available in Gemini over at this address (requires a Gemini client/browser to open).

Decor ✐ Cross-references

Black/white/grey bullet button Pages that cross-reference this one, if any exist, are listed below or will be listed below over time.

Decor ▢ Respond and Discuss

Black/white/grey bullet button If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

17 Comments

  1. Yuhong Bao said,

    December 20, 2009 at 4:13 pm

    Gravatar

    “The source code terms are a lot better, so I have to wonder what the Google people were thinking above”
    Google isn’t the only one making this mistake, Mozilla itself made it once too, and SUSE is another example I remember being covered on BN. I nowadays use Firefox mostly, with occasional use of Chrome sometimes.

  2. Yuhong Bao said,

    December 20, 2009 at 4:30 pm

    Gravatar

    “deceptive license from Microsoft”
    Looks like only WTL, which was Windows-only open source that came from Microsoft, and was part of what tied Chrome to Windows, until Sergey Brin was irritated at the lack of a Mac version. Now Chrome for Mac and Linux in beta.

    your_friend Reply:

    The Microsoft Permissive License is also included in some of the source code. Is there any Microsoft license that does not violate software freedom? The FSF opinion page on various licenses has one Microsoft Public License, which they urge people not to use because of it’s weak copyleft provisions. Notice that permissive and public share the same letters, MPL, as the Mozilla Public License. The name space collision is most likely intentional as are OOXML and many other phoney open things from Microsoft.

    Roy Schestowitz Reply:

    Yes, Subsonica has pointed this out

    Yuhong Bao Reply:

    According to Wikipedia, Microsoft Permissive License was renamed to Microsoft Public License when it was submitted to the OSI.

  3. Roy Schestowitz said,

    December 20, 2009 at 4:37 pm

    Gravatar

    …until Sergey Brin was irritated at the lack of a Mac version…

    I think that he still uses GNU/Linux actually.

    Yuhong Bao Reply:

    That claim comes from interviews with Sergey Brin I have read. I don’t think it really matters, as both are non-Windows platforms and are similar in many ways too.

    Roy Schestowitz Reply:

    I vaguely remember what he said and it was not about Apple. Unless you can find the source of course…

    Yuhong Bao Reply:

    Here is one source:
    http://valleywag.gawker.com/5044780/google-cofounder-on-no-chrome-for-macs-its-embarrassing

    Roy Schestowitz Reply:

    It seems like it’s the WSJers (Murdoch’s) who complained, not Brin.

    ‘”But you don’t have a Mac version, baby, so no,” Swisher tells him in this clip, excerpted from Swisher’s longer interview. “I know, I know, it’s embarrassing,” says Brin.’

    Roy Schestowitz Reply:

    I should add: on another occasion I believe that Brin actually wrote (proactively) about needing Google Earth for GNU/Linux, which he appears to have used on his desktop for over a decade.

    whatever Reply:

    At Google I/O in May (I was there), he spoke a lot about Chrome and Mac. Eric uses Mac for sure — I think Sergey is 50/50 Mac/Linux. I’ve never seen him at an even using anything but a MacBook Pro unless it was specifically for a demo.

    Not that it matters, the lack of a Mac version was hugely embarrassing as much of Google HQ uses Mac. I know a lot of Google people and only a handful use anything but Mac OS X — or at the very least they use Mac hardware. Even with Pinkerton (co-creator of Camino, the first Mac-native implementation of Gecko that predated Safari and outperformed Firefox for Mac until Firefox 3 — ironically both original Camino debs now work on WebKit. Scott at Apple, Mike at Google) on the team, the Mac version had no excuse for being so slow to go beta. I mean, it’s so similar to Safari as is (the web inspector is exactly the same as web inspector in Safari, right down to the glyphs and buttons. And that’s true for all platforms), just with differet JavaScript engine a d extension support that amounts to essentially GreaseMonkey.

    As for the EULA, whatever. I mean they say don’t be evil, but it’s not like they don’t want to track every aspect of your online activity so they can better sell ads against what you use.

    Roy Schestowitz Reply:

    Well, the EULA does matter though.

    Yuhong Bao Reply:

    “Eric uses Mac for sure — I think Sergey is 50/50 Mac/Linux. ”
    And as I said, it didn’t matter which one, because it was not actually about Chrome for Mac, it was about Chrome for non-Windows platforms.

    Roy Schestowitz Reply:

    But Schmidt was also in Apple’s board for a long time.

  4. seller_liar said,

    December 31, 2009 at 7:24 am

    Gravatar

    The google logo is very similar of freemansonry

    Roy Schestowitz Reply:

    I’m sure Brin and the lads never intended for this to happen back in 1998 (in a students’ garage).

    http://neatorama.cachefly.net/images/2008-02/logo-google.gif

DecorWhat Else is New


  1. Links 07/02/2023: Endless OS 5.0 and Voice.AI GPL Violations

    Links for the day



  2. No Doubt Microsoft Unleashed Another 'Tay', Spreading Bigotry Under the Guise of Hey Hi (AI)

    Reprinted with permission from Ryan



  3. Links 07/02/2023: Fedora 39 Development Plans Outlines

    Links for the day



  4. IRC Proceedings: Monday, February 06, 2023

    IRC logs for Monday, February 06, 2023



  5. Links 06/02/2023: Escuelas Linux 8.0 and Many Political Issues

    Links for the day



  6. Links 06/02/2023: Sparky 6.6 and IPFire 2.27 – Core Update 173

    Links for the day



  7. Taking Back Control or Seizing Autonomy Over the News Cycle (Informing People, Culling the Marketing)





  8. Reality Versus Fiction: EPO Insiders Versus EPO Web Site and UPC 'Churnalists'

    The "official" sources of the European Patent Office (EPO), as well as the sedated "media" that the EPO is bribing for further bias, cannot tell the truth about this very large institution; for proper examination of Europe's largest patent office one must pursue the interpretation by longtime veterans and insiders, who are increasingly upset and abused (they're being pressured to grant patents in violation of the charter of the EPO)



  9. Links 06/02/2023: Linux 6.2 RC7 and Fatal Earthquake

    Links for the day



  10. IRC Proceedings: Sunday, February 05, 2023

    IRC logs for Sunday, February 05, 2023



  11. Links 05/02/2023: Wayland in Bookworm and xvidtune 1.0.4

    Links for the day



  12. Links 05/02/2023: Pakistan Blocks Wikipedia, Musharraf Dies

    Links for the day



  13. IRC Proceedings: Saturday, February 04, 2023

    IRC logs for Saturday, February 04, 2023



  14. Links 04/02/2023: FOSDEM Happening and Ken Thompson in SoCal Linux Expo

    Links for the day



  15. 2023 is the Year Taxpayers' Money Goes to War and Energy Subsidies, Not Tech

    Now that a lot of powerful and omnipresent ‘tech’ (spying and policing) companies are rotting away we have golden opportunities to bring about positive change and maybe even recruit technical people for good causes



  16. Getting Back to Productive Computer Systems Would Benefit Public Health and Not Just Boost Productivity

    “Smartphoneshame” (shaming an unhealthy culture of obsession with “apps”) would potentially bring about a better, more sociable society with fewer mental health crises and higher productivity levels



  17. Links 04/02/2023: This Week in KDE and Many More Tech Layoffs

    Links for the day



  18. Dotcom Boom and Bust, Round 2

    The age of technology giants/monopolies devouring everything or military-funded (i.e. taxpayers-subsidised) surveillance/censorship tentacles, in effect privatised eyes of the state, may be ending; the United States can barely sustain that anymore and raising the debt ceiling won't solve that (buying time isn't the solution)



  19. Society Would Benefit From a Smartphoneshame Movement

    In a society plagued by blackmail, surveillance and frivolous lawsuits it is important to reconsider the notion of “smart” phone ownership; these devices give potentially authoritarian companies and governments far too much power over people (in the EU they want to introduce new legislation that would, in effect, ban Free software if it enables true privacy)



  20. IRC Proceedings: Friday, February 03, 2023

    IRC logs for Friday, February 03, 2023



  21. IRC Proceedings: Thursday, February 02, 2023

    IRC logs for Thursday, February 02, 2023



  22. Links 03/02/2023: Proton 7.0-6 Released, ScummVM 2.7 Testing

    Links for the day



  23. Links 03/02/2023: OpenSSH 9.2 and OBS Studio 29.0.1

    Links for the day



  24. Links 03/02/2023: GNU C Library 2.37

    Links for the day



  25. Sirius Finished

    Yesterday I was sent a letter approving my resignation from Sirius ‘Open Source’, two months after I had already announced that I was resigning with immediate effect; they sent an identical letter to my wife (this time, unlike before, they remembered to also change the names!!)



  26. The Collapse of Sirius in a Nutshell: How to Identify the Symptoms and Decide When to Leave

    Sirius is finished, but it's important to share the lessons learned with other people; there might be other "pretenders" out there and they need to be abandoned



  27. Links 03/02/2023: WINE 8.1 and RapidDisk 9.0.0

    Links for the day



  28. Links 02/02/2023: KDE Gear 22.12.2 and LibreOffice 7.5

    Links for the day



  29. Linux News or Marketing Platform?

    Ads everywhere: Phoronix puts them at the top, bottom, navigation bar, left, and right just to read some Microsoft junk (puff pieces about something that nobody other than Microsoft even uses); in addition there are pop-ups asking for consent to send visitors’ data to hundreds of data brokers



  30. Daily Links at Techrights Turn 15, Time to Give Them an Upgrade

    This year we have several 15-year anniversaries; one of them is Daily Links (it turned 15 earlier this week) and we've been working to improve these batches of links, making them a lot more extensive and somewhat better structured/clustered


RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

Recent Posts