mutually agree to do exactly what I want ..

- Original Message -
From: Ken Goetsch
Sent: Monday, July 17, 2000 4:41 PM
To: Sally Nguyen; Jason Kap
cc: Nancy McCauly (LCA)
Subject: System addition language

Sally / Jason

The new system addition language appears to some if us that worry about channel conflict to be a problem in an Office license.

The language is below:

.. COMPANY may elect to include as Customer System(s) new models which .. must have a unique model numbeer of model name used for intrnal and external identification purposes which distingouses it from any model which COMPANY has designated previously as a Customer System.

For Dell on Office, I am going to make this language to be "by mutal agreement" and instead will require our approval before a new model is licensed.

Ken

----------------------------------
Ken Goetsch	Microsoft OEM Sales
kengoe@microsoft.com 	http://microsoft.com/
425-936-2585 (voice)	425-936-7329 (fax)
 Pager: 800-759-8352 pin: 141-0370


- Original Message -
From: Jason Kap
Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2000 3:22 PM
To: Ken Goetsch; Sally Nguyen; 
cc: Nancy McCauly (LCA)
Subject: RE: System addition language

Sorry, but I can't follow what you want to do here.

 Original Message -
From: Ken Goetsch
Sent: Thursday, July 20, 2000 6:39 AM
To: Jason Kap; Sally Nguyen; 
cc: Nancy McCauly (LCA)
Subject: RE: System addition language

I have eliminated it for the Dell Office agreement. We do not want Dell to have the ability to automatically license a model for Office without our usual channel restrictions.

http://edge-op.org/iowa/www.iowaconsumercase.org/011607/4000/PX04076.pdf

-- 

court documents in the case of Comes v Microsoft.