Exploring the reality behind exclusionary deals with Microsoft and their subtle (yet severe) implications
Miguel de Icaza, with a history or taking Microsoft’s side, states: “The EU Prosecutors are Wrong“. This comes amid serious criticism which is taregetted at Microsoft’s attempt to thwart OpenDocument and spread a “monopoly enabler” instead. For context, here are some recent articles:
Highlight: Novell was the first to acknowledge that Microsoft FUD tactics had substance. Novell then used anti-Linux FUD to market itself. Learn more
Highlight: Xandros let Microsoft make patent claims and brag about (paid-for) OOXML support. Learn more
Highlight: Linspire's CEO not only fell into Microsoft arms, but he also assisted the company's attack on GNU/Linux. Learn more
Highlight: Microsoft craves pseudo (proprietary) standards and gets its way using proxies and influence which it buys. Learn more
Highlight: The invasion into the open source world is intended to leave Linux companies neglected, due to financial incentives from Microsoft. Learn more
Analysis: Xen, an open source hypervisor, possibly fell victim to Microsoft's aggressive (and stealthy) acquisition-by-proxy strategy. Learn more
shane said,
January 31, 2007 at 12:05 pm
Funny, but I expect this to be a common theme with Novell, defending their parent company, a big part of this deal is Novell legitimizing Microsoft’s claims that their interoperability protocols are worthy of royalty-based licensing fees, and the fact that Novell (usually a plaintiff in MS anti-trust suits) is defending Microsoft’s position is hillarious.
Alex said,
January 31, 2007 at 3:33 pm
Not only Miguel de Icaza backs OOXML … it also backs XAML … a new technology that’s basically ActiveX Reloaded, and that will bring us back to the dark days when websites where designed for Internet Explorer only.
His whole post is basically a big and ignorant apology for Microsoft’s actions.
If I ever had any doubt about Miguel being a Microsoft shill, now I am convinced.
I am deeply disappointed … Miguel proved he is a wonderful developer, hence he is very respected in the open-source community.
Miguel de Icaza said,
January 31, 2007 at 4:36 pm
Hello,
First of all, I wrote my blog entry on my personal web site, and not on Novell’s site. My blog entry represents my personal opinion as stated in each one of my blog entries.
Back when I started Gnumeric in 1998, one of our goals was to be compatible with mainstream users of Excel so I have gone down a path of actually implementing something that people were to use, I did not merely wave my hands around.
My opinion on Microsoft can not be represented by a boolean value (hate/love). There are things that I like about Microsoft and things I do not like, like everyone else. I avoid taking fundamentalist positions on any issues because am a humanist, a man of the illustration, a liberal, a follower of Voltaire.
As for XAML, you can read my criticism of Avalon and XAML on my blog, I have written quite a bit about it and warned about the potential danger that it posed as early as 2003.
Back in 2003 we had a chance to create an alternative, way before it shipped. Today it is too late. Nobody created a viable alternative to Avalon/XAML and any serious effort will take a couple of years to be launched at this point.
In 2003 we could have created something new, today XAML has real chances of becoming wildly adopted, and we will have no other choice but to implement it (if we want to interop in a Microsoft dominated world).
Miguel.
alex said,
January 31, 2007 at 5:20 pm
Miguel … all I see is that people started to care about standards, and interoperability is suddenly a requirement for all businesses.
Microsoft released OOXML in a defensive move to crush ODF.
And that’s all I need to know about it.
Considering Microsoft’s history … this is not the first or the last time Microsoft is looking to crush a standard.
That is why personally … I do not care about technical details.
All I care about is that Microsoft does not want interoperability.
And that is why the Prosecutors are Right.
shane said,
February 1, 2007 at 12:47 am
Hi Miguel,
Thank you for dropping by, but your personal views and outlook are indeed relevant to the direction that Novell has undertaken, in fact - according to Stafford Masie, Novell specifically acquired Ximian in order to have yourself and Nat Friedman help guide them into the Open Source realm:
shane said,
February 1, 2007 at 1:52 am
Rob Weir responds to Miguel